Not only is the “swastika poster” back….

Status
Not open for further replies.
Post 54: View attachment 1121108
Where does it mention you or anyone else of being the person this thread was supposed to be about?

The "thanks" I gave him for posting the link to the other thread, where you didn't reply with anything on topic, was for notifying me about it.

Where have I validated anyone's claim that you and/or Lisa are pretending to be someone else?

Give specifics. Don't twist words to mean what you want them to be.
Post 54 was a followup to his previous accusation.

He even admitted later on that he was accusing me of being the Nazi.ypu were too busy thanking him for various things to notice
 
Actually, I don't think that I said that I thought the Lisa558 account was portraying the character in an endeavor to get it banned for the purpose of setting the illusion of a precedent being set.

I said that I was of the opinion that Dawg might be.

And it's certainly not an invalid question at all. Just because nobody ever demonstrates the courage and good sense to ask it doesn't invalidate it.

But, what? According to the Dawg , I can't express my opinion when the Dawg himself and many others use the board as a platform to arbitrarily label anyone they want a ''Hamas member'' if they don't like the substance of their content?

Pft. He can kiss mah ass. lol...
She has already made it clear that you are both working together towards a common goal.

No need to overdo it.
 
So, still lurking... after saying bye twice.
Well, as I said, I'm multi-tasking at the moment. I did get my billing outta the way, though.

Now there's an attention hog.

Do you feel as if you're stranded in my shadow, Ropey?

It kind of sounds that way.

I'm sorry. But it'll be alright. Don't let it get to you. Your time will come.

And you still have ''y(our) shit'' downstairs if the feeling becomes too much to bear. You are a lion, Ropey...
 
Well, as I said, I'm multi-tasking at the moment. I did get my billing outta the way, though.

You can't stand to your own word.

Do you feel as if you're stranded in my shadow, Ropey?

:rofl:

You do think highly of yourself.

It kind of sounds that way.

When you talk about yourself it sure does.
I'm sorry.

Apology accepted.

But it'll be alright. Don't let it get to you. Your time will come.

All of our times will come. The Torah is written as an ..."Epilogue as Prologue" format.

And you still have ''y(our) shit'' downstairs if it becomes too much to bear.

Now that's imformative. :cool:

Since you said that?

I may come up to the general forum again. It's been quite some time. :blues:
 
:rofl:

There is no show or stars.

And you have no point.

Other than that you seem to think there is a show and stars... or that there should be a show and you deserve to be a star?

Still, thank you for inviting me back to the general forum.

:blues:
 
Post 54 was a followup to his previous accusation.

He even admitted later on that he was accusing me of being the Nazi.ypu were too busy thanking him for various things to notice
Again, where does Post 54 mention you or anyone else of being the person this thread was supposed to be about?
 
Post 54.
One of the benefts of not saying much and just observing people, you see and recognize quite a bit.
But you say a lot, so there's a conundrum in your statement ... when applied to you.

:blues:
 
He sure does have some mad teacher's pet skills for a "natural" citizen, too, doesn't he?
It's Natty C and Aye against the world?

That's unimportant.

Since.
You’re a true friend of the clique. dilly dilly :beer:

Yes, I'm being tres sarcastic. :)
 
Post 54: View attachment 1121108
Where does it mention you or anyone else of being the person this thread was supposed to be about?

The "thanks" I gave him for posting the link to the other thread, where you didn't reply with anything on topic, was for notifying me about it.

Where have I validated anyone's claim that you and/or Lisa are pretending to be someone else?

Give specifics. Don't twist words to mean what you want them to be.
FYI, in post #44, he asks “what if Lisa558 or her roadies is the swastika poster?” and then makes a comment that “it would make perfect sense for a lobby (ie, Jews) like them”

What he is doing is trying to deny the level of rabid antisemitism by blaming a Jew (or her “lobby”) for faking Jew-hate.

 
That's the Natty C I know.

He's often lumping people together to attack a group.
 
FYI, in post #44, he asks “what if Lisa558 or her roadies is the swastika poster?”

So did you or one of your roadies portray the swastika guy character in an endeavor to get it banned for the purpose of setting the illusion of a precedent being set.

That was a question. And it was point blank.

You are not above equally valid questions just because you invoke that ''I'm a Jew girl" line and therefore am beyond reproach. Which you do consistently and observably.

There never was an answer to my question, however.

Why not?

Yes or no will suffice.

And, to be clear, before you throw up another arbitrary victim status card up in the air, the only person I said that I thought might have been playing the role of the swastika guy poster was the Dawg. Who is indeed one of your loyal roadies, observably.

Until that's cleared up, I still hold that belief.

Which, really, is no different than you expressing the belief that anyone who doesn't bow down and conform to your daily narrative is a Hamas terrorist or supporter.

Do you think that you are so special that only you are entitled to an opinion. If so, then why?

You also never answered the question as to whether or not you're were operating here on behalf of an organization. That's a question that you consistently avoid when asked. I think that's also a valid question given that your content, regardless of what thread you enter, is almost universally premised upon Jewish victimhood and that anyone who doesnlt agree wit hyou is a Hamas terrorist or supporter, observably.

And that's an especially valid question given that such organizations expend a great deal of time and revenue trying to censor views which on platforms such as these where some voices may not completely align with their agendas. And you're well known for demanding censorsip and bannings of anyone who does not conform to your program.
 
Last edited:
FYI, in post #44, he asks “what if Lisa558 or her roadies is the swastika poster?” and then makes a comment that “it would make perfect sense for a lobby (ie, Jews) like them”

What he is doing is trying to deny the level of rabid antisemitism by blaming a Jew (or her “lobby”) for faking Jew-hate.

Aye prefers to play this little mod game with her cohort, here, as she knows full well that neither of us is the Nazi, but plays stupid in order to keep it in the realm of possibility.
 
Aye prefers to play this little mod game with her cohort, here, as she knows full well that neither of us is the Nazi, but plays stupid in order to keep it in the realm of possibility.
I am sure when she gets back to this page, she will clarify that neither of us is the Nazi - and admonish the poster who made such an outlandish and insulting suggestion.

She will also admonish him for his obvious antisemitic remark that it makes sense that “the lobby” (I.e., Jewish or AIPAC) would pull such a “conniving” his word) stunt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom