gold something
Active Member
- Sep 15, 2025
- 217
- 120
- 43
- Banned
- #281
Read Struth's quote. It says, "Obama was in office in 2016."Oblama was not running for office in 2016
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read Struth's quote. It says, "Obama was in office in 2016."Oblama was not running for office in 2016
Ok. Not sure your point.Oblama was not running for office in 2016
Obama brought about racial harmony? I doubt America, or anywhere else for that matter, will ever have racial harmony where blacks are involved and will never be as long as they see themselves as victims and act as entitled parasites. Blacks are not an harmonious race, not even between themselves.
I don't doubt you could go on forever if you knew the name of all the blacks in the US going back to the first brought in as slaves. They were, or are, all victims. In fact you could go on to several black shitholes throughout the world, more often than not of their own race. Go for it.Elijah McClain was a victim. Andre Hill was a victim. The list is long, should I continue?
Explain the few who should have won, why they should, & WHY others did win.Of course it is an insult to the few who should have won it, Trump. Reagan and Thatcher to name a few. It should be renamed to the Woke Prize and give the Peace Prize to those who actually deserve it.
I'm talking about the Nobel Peace prize. Not sure what you're babbling about.Explain the few who should have won, why they should, & WHY others did win.
COME ON... Nobel prize have been around a long time. WHAT NOTABLE place do you hold in contributions to history?
that you or your group get to decide?
How about getting the guy who caused 9/11.I agree that Obama deserves a lot of recognition for being the first black president. It is an historic achievement which will be forever in the history books. He deserves that recognition. BUT, that is not what the Nobel Peace Prize is for. It is for doing something to promote or achieve peace in the world. Obama did absolutely nothing in those regards to win a Nobel Peace prize not only at the time he won it, but throughout his presidency he really did nothing else to win that particular award.
That's our problem, We don't have enough information to know what's going on in the world.Okay, I get where you're coming from but still, some nobody got it Instead of Trump. That's the part that I'm upset about. If it had been somebody deserving of it then I would say sure, but I never even heard of that woman before.
I don't doubt you could go on forever if you knew the name of all the blacks in the US going back to the first brought in as slaves. They were, or are, all victims. In fact you could go on to several black shitholes throughout the world, more often than not of their own race. Go for it.
That was kinda the point.
what will they do?This is not a joke from the Onion
Norway Braces for Trump Reaction to Nobel Peace Prize Snub

Who's that?How about getting the guy who caused 9/11.
...
The same blackness that would have forced him to ride on the back of the bus
...
...
The same blackness that would have gotten his father lynched for marrying a white woman
...
...The same blackness that made him become the first black in over 200 years to be elected President.
...
99% of all countries are historically racist. But I do agree with you Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize because of his skin color, had it not for that, he would not have won.He won because he was the first black person to become President in a historically racist America
Yep, that’s what I’m hearing, I wonder if most democrats think that.Wait a minute. Are you saying Obama got elected because of the color of his skin? That's not right.
It would make sense if not for the Dems taking 60 seats in the Senate and a huge majority in the HouseYep, that’s what I’m hearing, I wonder if most democrats think that.
What does having 60 seats in the Senate a majority in the house have to do with Obama getting the Peace prize?It would make sense if not for the Dems taking 60 seats in the Senate and a huge majority in the House
McCain was going to lose anyway
Has to do with Dems winning in 2008 regardless of who their candidate wasWhat does having 60 seats in the Senate a majority in the house have to do with Obama getting the Peace prize?
And with big majorities the guy couldn’t get anything done, I never understood that.