NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

[Old Rocks]

Just saying doesn't make it so. And the President got what he asked for to implement our part of that treaty in the budget passed by Congress.

Your picture must illustrate the definition of Gullible.

I see. Accepting what the scientists are presenting evidence for is gullable. Believing what an obeses junkie on the AM radio says is not. Ah yes, I perfecttly understand where you are coming from. LOL

 

[Hossfly]

More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.

Has anyone ever considered that the NOAA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics could have gotten their global temperatures mixed up with the unemployment rate? Stranger things have happened in DC.

Ever considered actually researching anything at all?

Nah, we'll let you do the research, Captain Knowledge. Submit a report every day at 9AM.

Why not one right now, ol' Hoss.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

A site from the American Institute of Physics, the largest Scientific Society in the world.

Thanks. I'll run this through Snopes and get back to you.

 

[boedicca]

Just saying doesn't make it so. And the President got what he asked for to implement our part of that treaty in the budget passed by Congress.

Your picture must illustrate the definition of Gullible.

I see. Accepting what the scientists are presenting evidence for is gullable. Believing what an obeses junkie on the AM radio says is not. Ah yes, I perfecttly understand where you are coming from. LOL

Jeebus you are dummmmbbbbb.

 

[Old Rocks]

More lies from the people that want to give us a central planning economy and a jack booted government all in the name of protecting Mother Earth..

Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50%

Another week, another study showing that our official climate data gatekeepers have been exaggerating the extent of “global warming” to make it look more scary, more urgent, more desperately in need of extra funding for our official climate data gatekeepers…
This one, co-authored by meteorologist Anthony Watts (of Watts Up With That?fame) shows that at least half of the “global warming” in the US since 1979 has been fabricated by NOAA.

While satellite records have shown no global warming for at least 18 years, the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.

One reason for this discrepancy, the study suggests, is that NOAA has been cherry-picking its raw data. That is, it has ignored the evidence from those weather stations showing little or no late Twentieth century warming and instead placed undue emphasis on the ones thatdo show warming.

Has anyone ever considered that the NOAA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics could have gotten their global temperatures mixed up with the unemployment rate? Stranger things have happened in DC.

Ever considered actually researching anything at all?

Nah, we'll let you do the research, Captain Knowledge. Submit a report every day at 9AM.

Why not one right now, ol' Hoss.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

A site from the American Institute of Physics, the largest Scientific Society in the world.

Thanks. I'll run this through Snopes and get back to you.

Well, Ol' Hoss, here is another one you can run through. From the American Geophysical Union Conferance of 2012;

 

[Old Rocks]

Just saying doesn't make it so. And the President got what he asked for to implement our part of that treaty in the budget passed by Congress.

Your picture must illustrate the definition of Gullible.

I see. Accepting what the scientists are presenting evidence for is gullable. Believing what an obeses junkie on the AM radio says is not. Ah yes, I perfecttly understand where you are coming from. LOL

Jeebus you are dummmmbbbbb.

Really? And how many Scientific Societies state that AGW is not real? How many National Academies of Science? And how many major Universities?

So, how does that match your statement?

 

[Hossfly]

Has anyone ever considered that the NOAA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics could have gotten their global temperatures mixed up with the unemployment rate? Stranger things have happened in DC.

Ever considered actually researching anything at all?

Nah, we'll let you do the research, Captain Knowledge. Submit a report every day at 9AM.

Why not one right now, ol' Hoss.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

A site from the American Institute of Physics, the largest Scientific Society in the world.

Thanks. I'll run this through Snopes and get back to you.

Well, Ol' Hoss, here is another one you can run through. From the American Geophysical Union Conferance of 2012;

Interesting. Maybe those eggheads can figure out a way to let some of that Absolute Zero from space into our atmosphere to cool it off.

 

[Old Rocks]

Ever considered actually researching anything at all?

Nah, we'll let you do the research, Captain Knowledge. Submit a report every day at 9AM.

Why not one right now, ol' Hoss.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

A site from the American Institute of Physics, the largest Scientific Society in the world.

Thanks. I'll run this through Snopes and get back to you.

Well, Ol' Hoss, here is another one you can run through. From the American Geophysical Union Conferance of 2012;

Interesting. Maybe those eggheads can figure out a way to let some of that Absolute Zero from space into our atmosphere to cool it off.

Whoa, there, Ol' Hoss, space has no temperature. Only the matter or radiation in it has temperature. And the radiation from our sun is what currently warms the planet, and there is so little matter that it would make no appreciable differance, even if you could round it up somehow. At least not in the first 200,000 km out from this planet.