Why is NK giving up nukes required for peace in the world? It's not as if they've used them. One would think those having used nukes should give them up as obviously being too unstable. Otherwise ignore possession of nukes in the pursuit of peace, if peace is actually one's goal. But it isn't, is it?
Smart enough not to fall in that trap you meant.
You sound sometimes like your mind has left the Reservation, so most people thing you're a Democrat.I voted for Reagan you weasel eating fiend so take yer partisan bullshit and shove it up yer ass where your head is also stored. The bomb was better than millions of US soldiers getting killed but we can tell by your retort you wanted US soldiers dead instead of Japanese soldiers.Why the republicans were the leaders of the bomb them all and it came from Reagan.I don't see the repubs crying about it.Lefties are likewoo we still have nuclear Armageddon hanging over our heads, yay!
I'd be nice to see republicans get a little bit of credit for at least toning down the "bomb em all, let god sort em out" attitude of the 80s and 90s.
You are confused Moon Bat, as always.
It was the deployment of Pershing Missiles in Europe by Reagan, Kohl and Thatcher that forced the Soviets to capitulate. That was a good thing.
Trump threatening force was what got the NORKs to the negotiating table, not giving them money for nothing like that idiot Slick Willy did.
I know that History is not one of the strong suits for you stupid Moon Bats but the only time nuclear weapons have ever been used it was by a Democrat President so you can just go **** yourself with your ignorant partisan bullshit.
Because, unlike Barry, he TRIED and lil' Kim walked away.
Barry never tried.
You can't fail if you don't try!
For liberals, yes he did. For america, no.Because, unlike Barry, he TRIED and lil' Kim walked away.
Barry never tried.
You can't fail if you don't try!
So he did fail then. Thanks.
Like Barry did...and let them get missile technology that enables them to strike US assets with their nukes.
Bwuhahahaha.....snowflakes celebrating losers who don't / didn't even try. That figures...
Yeah, I'm certain you would make a good democrat president...not too bright, which would be typical of one.
Schumer says YOU LIE....LOLOLOLBecause, unlike Barry, he TRIED and lil' Kim walked away.
Barry never tried.
You can't fail if you don't try!
So he did fail then. Thanks.
Actually he did not. Trying and not succeeding is not the same thing as 'failing'.
NO NUKE DEAL
A working lunch and joint signing ceremony were unexpectedly canceled on Thursday afternoon.
President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un failed to reach a nuclear agreement during their second summit, which was abruptly cut short in Hanoi, Vietnam on Thursday afternoon.
Trump, Kim Fail To Reach Agreement In Hanoi After Talks Abruptly Cut Short
Did Cohen distract Trump? What do you think?
Whish is why Obama was so silent about NK while they were acquiring missile technology giving them the ability to his US assets with their nukes on HIS watch....
Setting up what many all over the world recognize as an historic series of meetings 'a display of incompetence'?
Cowering at the negotiation tables with your hat in your hand while the leaders of those you are negotiating with call you so desperate you will do anything they ask, while their military conduct training sessions practicing destroying your aircraft carriers, and while their leaders lead chants of 'Death To America' is a 'DISPLAY OF INCOMPETENCE'.
Admitting that 'you' cowardly refused to demand the release of US Hostages be part of the 'treaty' because you were AFRAID they would walk away from the table, having to pay a ransom later because you were a gutless coward who was desperate to get a deal at any cost is a 'DISPLAY OF INCOMPETENCE'.
Refusing to even engage in negotiations to TRY to get better trade deals for Americans, instead telling Americans manufacturing jobs are gone forever, never coming back, and this is the 'New Norm' is a 'DISPLAY OF INCOMPETENCE'.
