No kings day paid fir by Democrat donors

Whatever you want to believe.
No one doubts that. They saw gazillions of angry, energized people trying to remove Trump, everyone else saw one of the most pathetic political rallies of all time. We saw sll groups of senile geriatrics with their walkers asking for directions and where is the free pizza. Most funerals have more energy than this protest generated. Absolutely friggin' pathetic.....
 
Billionaire donor George Soros is reportedly funding many of the organizations leading the "No Kings" protests, like Indivisible, whose co-founders, Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin, received a $3 million two-year grant last year from Soros’s Open Society Foundations for "social welfare activities." Details about the "Palestine Contingent" weaving into the "No Kings" protests raises new questions about the way big Democratic donors like Soros are funneling nonprofit dollars into a professional protest industry that is fractious, divisive and partisan, potentially in violation of tax and nonprofit laws.

Behind the emotion and patriotic imagery of the protests, a Fox News Digital investigation revealed that the movement’s polished "pro-democracy" branding masks a coordinated network of Democratic tax-exempt nonprofits and labor unions, political action committees, coalitions and for-profit protest consultants that include some of the most virulent activists against Israel, including self-declared socialist groups like the Party for Socialism and Liberation, Democratic Socialists of America and Students for a Democratic Society.

According to a public database of the protest’s organizers, compiled by the Pearl Project, a journalism initiative, the protest’s "partners" include 265 mostly nonprofit organizations, including some anti-Israel groups, like Jewish Voice for Peace, exploiting their nonprofit benefits to wage a political war against the sitting president. Their nonprofit status shields them from paying taxes on most of their total annual revenues of $2.9 billion, even while they engage in partisan work they aren’t supposed to be doing. Critics say they are allegedly skirting, if not violating, tax and nonprofit laws. Event organizers didn’t return requests for comment.

"They call it ‘No Kings,’ but what they’ve built is an empire of tax-exempt organizations doing the Democratic Party’s work on the taxpayer’s dime," said Jennica Pounds, a computer scientist who runs a platform, DataRepublican.com, following the money on these organizations. "They are using every excuse in the book, from immigration to Israel, to rage-bait America. There is nothing ‘charitable’ about their professional protest enterprise, and they should be investigated for fomenting so much hate in America behind the shield of ‘charity work.’"

Which doesnt change the facts easily supported buy tax records. Prosecutions to follow.
What a load of misinformation you are giving with this OP.

No, in essence Soros is not specifically funding the "No Kings Protest"

From your OWN link:

In 2023, the foundation, through the Open Society Action Fund, issued a two-year grant of $3 million to the Indivisible organization. The grant was "to support the grantee's social welfare activities," according to the Open Society Foundation's website.

As such, this grant was done in 2023 (2 years ago) and it was done to "grant social wefare activities", meaning not specifically protests!

In addition:

AI Overview

Organizers for the nationwide "No Kings" protests on October 18, 2025, estimated that nearly 7 million people participated across more than 2,700 U.S. cities and towns. This figure was higher than the approximately 5 million estimated to have attended the initial "No Kings Day" protests in June 2025.

This means that if Soros was specifically funding this protest, He would be paying $2.30 to each person to participate. Would that amount cause you reason to go out and waste your entire day participating in a protest?

Oh, and by the way, that would also mean that the foundation had not spent a penny on anything else for the past 2 years.

Bullshit OP!
 
One thing you cannot ignore is the HUGE amount of people in those protests. It means that a large number of Americans is unhappy with Trump. NEVER before have so many people have farhered against a president

That they gathered isnt relevant. They would have been against trump if they were sitting at home in their armchair. Those people hated trump before they gathered, they will have then long after the protest.

All this did was show that those that hate trump are willing to move that hate from their arm chair, to a city street for a day.

If you can show where a significant number of people were moved from their positions to being against trump because of the protest, then id say you have something.
 
That they gathered isnt relevant. They would have been against trump if they were sitting at home in their armchair. Those people hated trump before they gathered, they will have then long after the protest.

All this did was show that those that hate trump are willing to move that hate from their arm chair, to a city street for a day.

If you can show where a significant number of people were moved from their positions to being against trump because of the protest, then id say you have something.
Was there a point in there somewhere?

Trump is hated the world over.

While Trumpsters like to repeat the results of the last election, they men behind the Curtsin worry about it.

Trump has run three times, and lost twice.

He has launched a failed coup against his own country.

Trump isn’t president because he is loved and admired, but because people stayed home.

Even then, Kamala Harris, with a hastily assembled last minute campaign came close to beating him.

They know that, dispite the bluster.

They can also read polls.

Trump’s policies are set to hurt the people who voted for him hard next year.

They know that too.
 
Was there a point in there somewhere?

Trump is hated the world over.

While Trumpsters like to repeat the results of the last election, they men behind the Curtsin worry about it.

Trump has run three times, and lost twice.

He has launched a failed coup against his own country.

Trump isn’t president because he is loved and admired, but because people stayed home.

Even then, Kamala Harris, with a hastily assembled last minute campaign came close to beating him.

They know that, dispite the bluster.

They can also read polls.

Trump’s policies are set to hurt the people who voted for him hard next year.

They know that too.

Trump has run three times, and lost twice.

LOL!

Hillary ran twice and lost to 2 amateurs.
 
Billionaire donor George Soros is reportedly funding many of the organizations leading the "No Kings" protests, like Indivisible, whose co-founders, Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin, received a $3 million two-year grant last year from Soros’s Open Society Foundations for "social welfare activities." Details about the "Palestine Contingent" weaving into the "No Kings" protests raises new questions about the way big Democratic donors like Soros are funneling nonprofit dollars into a professional protest industry that is fractious, divisive and partisan, potentially in violation of tax and nonprofit laws.

Behind the emotion and patriotic imagery of the protests, a Fox News Digital investigation revealed that the movement’s polished "pro-democracy" branding masks a coordinated network of Democratic tax-exempt nonprofits and labor unions, political action committees, coalitions and for-profit protest consultants that include some of the most virulent activists against Israel, including self-declared socialist groups like the Party for Socialism and Liberation, Democratic Socialists of America and Students for a Democratic Society.

According to a public database of the protest’s organizers, compiled by the Pearl Project, a journalism initiative, the protest’s "partners" include 265 mostly nonprofit organizations, including some anti-Israel groups, like Jewish Voice for Peace, exploiting their nonprofit benefits to wage a political war against the sitting president. Their nonprofit status shields them from paying taxes on most of their total annual revenues of $2.9 billion, even while they engage in partisan work they aren’t supposed to be doing. Critics say they are allegedly skirting, if not violating, tax and nonprofit laws. Event organizers didn’t return requests for comment.

"They call it ‘No Kings,’ but what they’ve built is an empire of tax-exempt organizations doing the Democratic Party’s work on the taxpayer’s dime," said Jennica Pounds, a computer scientist who runs a platform, DataRepublican.com, following the money on these organizations. "They are using every excuse in the book, from immigration to Israel, to rage-bait America. There is nothing ‘charitable’ about their professional protest enterprise, and they should be investigated for fomenting so much hate in America behind the shield of ‘charity work.’"

Which doesnt change the facts easily supported buy tax records. Prosecutions to follow.

1760968537028.webp
 
Tell us how the soybean farmers are winning.
Because your news agency of choice is hate Trump fake news you must not have heard... Trump is using Tariff money to pay the farmers... if you people would just turn off lib news you would not look so dumb when you post here...
 
Anyone with a 5th grade education knows we're a constitutional republic.

So, you only made it to the 4th grade. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
There is no difference between a representative democracy and a constitutional republic.
 
Because your news agency of choice is hate Trump fake news you must not have heard... Trump is using Tariff money to pay the farmers... if you people would just turn off lib news you would not look so dumb when you post here...
So he has to give them a Welfare payoff just like his first term. Yea, good job.
 
There is no difference between a representative democracy and a constitutional republic.

This is a routine Trumpster claim, which is intended to pretend that the US isn’t a country that elects it’s leaders on both a stat and federal level.

Facists love this hide behind.
 
That they gathered isnt relevant. They would have been against trump if they were sitting at home in their armchair. Those people hated trump before they gathered, they will have then long after the protest.

All this did was show that those that hate trump are willing to move that hate from their arm chair, to a city street for a day.

If you can show where a significant number of people were moved from their positions to being against trump because of the protest, then id say you have something.
Yeah, 7 million of them. 3% of the adult population and the biggest crowd ever to gather against a president
 
15th post
Was there a point in there somewhere?
Sure, read it again if you missed it.


While Trumpsters like to repeat the results of the last election, they men behind the Curtsin worry about it.

I see no evidence ot that.

Trump has run three times, and lost twice.
Really? My math says he ran 3 times and won twice.

Trump isn’t president because he is loved and admired, but because people stayed home.

And who's fault is that?

Even then, Kamala Harris, with a hastily assembled last minute campaign came close to beating him.

And the fact that she didnt should concern YOU. Biden won with the most votes of any president, so kamala should have easily beaten him. The fact that she lost should show you that the dems apparently didbt care enough to show up.

They can also read polls.

Polls are largely meaningless. You can make those polls weighted to whatever position you want. A lot of them over sample specific demographics.

Trump’s policies are set to hurt the people who voted for him hard next year.

They know that too.

I'll agree, im not keen on some of the things hes done, and I hope he reverses on some of them.
 
Yeah, 7 million of them. 3% of the adult population and the biggest crowd ever to gather against a president

Did you read what wrote? Do you not think republicans couldn't do the same thing? The dont because they are not interested in spending all day standing around clogging the streets. Repubs could muster the same numbers if they wanted to. I give credit to the dems, they are certainly good at gathering for protests. Thats something that repubs aren't interested in.
 
Back
Top Bottom