NIH Admits To Funding Gain-Of-Function Research In Wuhan Lab


In addition to receiving sizable grants from Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and hosting Fauci repeatedly as a speaker at its events, EcoHealth Alliance also appears to retain close relationships to additional federal agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through its research partnerships.

Three officials from the CDC are listed as active “partners” of EcoHealth Alliance along with one NIH official on the group’s website.

Since September 2012, two years before Fauci’s NIH agency funded EcoHealth Alliance’s bat coronavirus research with the Wuhan lab, Dr. Rima Khabbaz, the Director of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases has been listed as on the group’s official partners.

Since April 2015, Dr. Heinz Feldmann, a Senior Investigator at the NIH, has also been a partner of EcoHealth Alliance. Feldman’s NIH biography describes him as a “laboratory expert on high containment viruses (BSL-4)” – the same biosafety level of the Wuhan Institue of Virology facility working on bat coronaviruses. Capt. Jason Thomas, the Biosurveillance Coordinator at the CDC, along with Dr. Stuart Nichol, Chief of the Molecular Biology Section of the Special Pathogens Branch at the CDC, have also been listed as EcoHealth Alliance partners since April 2015.

All aforementioned federal officials are still listed as EcoHealth Alliance partners, classified as “Science and Policy Advisors,” at the time of publication. Among the group’s other advisors is the Deputy Director for Surveillance and Epidemiology at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and World Health Organization (WHO) officials.
Did not Fauci lie to congress about gain of function research? Why has he not been prosecuted? Why is he still employed? Why is the corporate media still using him as a reliable source of information? Why has no one in congress or media asked Fauci about the multiple allegations of illegal actions RFK Jr. accused him of in his best selling book?

I’m guessing Fauci will face no repercussions for his multiple lies and criminal actions. Further proof we live in a failed state.
 
RFK Jr. did not mention Daszak co-authoring the discovery paper for the virus that Baric worked on, dating back to Ap 2011, RsSHC014. Sorensen et al says of this virus that made it into a 2015 publication,
'The 2015 authors were well aware that the chimeric virus which they had created was very dangerous because they discussed this fact. The paper states that this research consortium has permission to continue this research.'
 
You have reached the level of an obvious time waster and lets stop wasting readers’ time. Time is too valuable to repeat truths to posters who are blindly led and won’t read. As per my source, your claim is a lie:

“But to some scientists, another part of EcoHealth’s year five grant progress report was also troubling: results from studies that manipulated a different coronavirus, the one that causes Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). That virus, MERS-CoV, which originated in bats before spreading to camels and then people, is lethal in roughly 35% of diagnosed human cases.”

To be clear, I am calling you a complete waste of time so you have no need to ask /waste time.
Where is the Eco Health citation for the MERS experiments? They link to Daszak's co-authored paper for the Ap 2011 discovery of RsSHC014, taken from a site on the edge of an expressway outside Kunming. They were monitoring anthropomorphic influences on virus infections of bats, bats having evolved for millions of years without such influences.
 
This virus from Kunming, RsSHC014, was made into a mouse-adapted chimeric virus at Chapel Hill: SHC014-MA. Right from nature, it carries a lysine (K) at position 969 of the spike protein. Omicron N969K is a comparable mutation, especially if the hypothesis holds (a published hypothesis) that Omicron's origins evolved in mice.
 
Did not Fauci lie to congress about gain of function research? Why has he not been prosecuted? Why is he still employed? Why is the corporate media still using him as a reliable source of information? Why has no one in congress or media asked Fauci about the multiple allegations of illegal actions RFK Jr. accused him of in his best selling book?

I’m guessing Fauci will face no repercussions for his multiple lies and criminal actions. Further proof we live in a failed state.
It could be that the government see's it as protecting the character of the Nation by not allowing the persecution of Fauci (allowed to go way to far), otherwise to tarnish the character or credibility of the nation in a scenario that might do just that. He might just skate.
 
It could be that the government see's it as protecting the character of the Nation by not allowing the persecution of Fauci (allowed to go way to far), otherwise to tarnish the character or credibility of the nation in a scenario that might do just that. He might just skate.
I’m almost certain Fauci will skate. He’s lied repeatedly to the American people. He’s lied to congress. He’s been accused of some very heinous actions by several people including RFK Jr., yet he is still considered the go to expert by the establishment media. So far he hasn’t faced any repercussions for his actions.
 
Where is the Eco Health citation for the MERS experiments? They link to Daszak's co-authored paper for the Ap 2011 discovery of RsSHC014, taken from a site on the edge of an expressway outside Kunming. They were monitoring anthropomorphic influences on virus infections of bats, bats having evolved for millions of years without such

I think this contains the info that you’ve referenced:

“In September, The Intercept received two grant proposals by EcoHealth Alliance that were submitted to the NIH. One of the proposals, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” detailed troubling and potentially dangerous research conducted with bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China. But the first release of the documents, which The Intercept received more than a year after it requested them, did not include the progress report for the grant’s fifth and final funding year.”

“One of the grants, titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” outlines an ambitious effort led by EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak to screen thousands of bat samples for novel coronaviruses. The research also involved screening people who work with live animals. The documents contain several critical details about the research in Wuhan, including the fact that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment — and not at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as was previously assumed. The documents raise additional questions about the theory that the pandemic may have begun in a lab accident, an idea that Daszak has aggressively dismissed.”

 
I think this contains the info that you’ve referenced:

“In September, The Intercept received two grant proposals by EcoHealth Alliance that were submitted to the NIH. One of the proposals, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” detailed troubling and potentially dangerous research conducted with bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China. But the first release of the documents, which The Intercept received more than a year after it requested them, did not include the progress report for the grant’s fifth and final funding year.”

“One of the grants, titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” outlines an ambitious effort led by EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak to screen thousands of bat samples for novel coronaviruses. The research also involved screening people who work with live animals. The documents contain several critical details about the research in Wuhan, including the fact that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment — and not at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as was previously assumed. The documents raise additional questions about the theory that the pandemic may have begun in a lab accident, an idea that Daszak has aggressively dismissed.”

Yes, on Edward Hooper's page, he agrees with the other animal facility scenario as suspect. However, the virus was discovered in 2011. They're not going to store this virus away for posterity. It was at Baric's Chapel Hill lab where the virus was adapted to HAE's (human airway epithelial) cells. Baric could have had possession of RsSHC014 as early as April 2011. Furthermore, Sorensen, et al state that the source of that particular HAE cell line used for the mouse-adapted remains esoteric knowledge.
 
I think this contains the info that you’ve referenced:

“In September, The Intercept received two grant proposals by EcoHealth Alliance that were submitted to the NIH. One of the proposals, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” detailed troubling and potentially dangerous research conducted with bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China. But the first release of the documents, which The Intercept received more than a year after it requested them, did not include the progress report for the grant’s fifth and final funding year.”

“One of the grants, titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” outlines an ambitious effort led by EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak to screen thousands of bat samples for novel coronaviruses. The research also involved screening people who work with live animals. The documents contain several critical details about the research in Wuhan, including the fact that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment — and not at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as was previously assumed. The documents raise additional questions about the theory that the pandemic may have begun in a lab accident, an idea that Daszak has aggressively dismissed.”

The "troubling and potentially dangerous" report above is not the story we get from Sorensen, et al. They were allowed tp continue working with mouse-adapted virus, SHC014-MA, even after they knew it was dangerous. We are going to have to keep citing specific reports and excerpting them so that the prisoners get clued up.
 
So the Chapel Hill lab is important for the history of the Kunming bat virus, RsSHC014-MA as Sorensen, Susrud and Dalgleish (USMB search) further explain: 'We suggest that it is a high priority in further investigations to ascertain precisely from Chapel Hill lab records the exact donor provenance of 2B4 Calu-3 (cells).'

Between Daszak and Baric, they would want to have a cell line that would precisely fit the danger of the mouse chimera they had created. Therefore, Rand Paul should be asking Baric and Daszak the questions while his wife can continue dalliance with remdesivir futures. The Calu-3 cell line: did it come from an obese diabetic American? Did the Calu-3 donor have any closely-related South African connections that those of us who study Omicron would want to know about?
 
So the CIA is implicated not only in having a puppet in the White House, the link is to the virus discovered in 2011, RsSHC014, Obama having made it look legitimate when he and his crony JoeXi funded Duke-NUS Singapore, by issuing a (fake) moratorium. Kennedy explains:

'And as DARPA director, Callahan lunched the PREDICT project in 2009 following Jeremy Farrar's fake bird flu pandemic. PREDICT appeared to be a reincarnation of the CIA's Argus project under the cover of USAID. PREDICT is the largest single source of funding to Daszak, with a $3.4 million subgrant routed through the University of California (2015-2020). PREDICT became the largest funder of gain-of-function studies and served as the principle funding vehicle through which the gain-of-function cartel evaded Barack Obama's 2014 presidential moratorium.

When during the height of the presidential gain-of-function moratorium, Ralph Baric and the UTMB lab's Vineet Menachery brazenly published their alarming 2015 study -- describing their reckless experiments to breed pandemic bat coronaviruses that could spread via respiratory droplets in humanized mice -- they omitted mentioning, in their initial online version of the article, that one of the funding sources was USAID-EPT-PREDICT. Apparanetly hoping to cover its tracks, PREDICT had laundered its grant through Peter Daszak's Eco Health Alliance. USAID's PREDICT boasts that it has identified almost a thousand new viruses, including a new strain of Ebola, and trained some 5,000 people.

In October 2019, not long before COVID-19 emerged, USAID abruptly ceased funding PREDICT, a decision bemoaned by Daszak in the New York Times as "definitely a loss." '
(Kennedy, The Real Anthony Fauci, p. 396)
 
But we can't see how well they laundered its grant, because Daszak co-authored the collection publication of the virus, RsSHC014, which even gives the exact coordinates near the Kunming expressway(18 Ap 2011).
 
So the Chapel Hill lab is important for the history of the Kunming bat virus, RsSHC014-MA as Sorensen, Susrud and Dalgleish (USMB search) further explain: 'We suggest that it is a high priority in further investigations to ascertain precisely from Chapel Hill lab records the exact donor provenance of 2B4 Calu-3 (cells).'
None of those usernames sound familiar..

Just kidding. Proceed..
 
Oh, another supposedly gotcha thread by the wingnut white privilege conservative on Doctor Fauci.
Well, he finally admitted to it under oath in he deposition yesterday, which means you are a stupid fucking idiot who doesnt know shit. Sorry, but that is simply a fact. :dunno:

 
If you'd like to keep beating on gain of function, be my guest. It's a talking point for you and it makes you righties feel better.
How incredibly stupid do you feel now that Fauci finally admitted that they were doing gain of function?

 

Forum List

Back
Top