The idea that the right is using Kirk, in order to push for civil war is absurd.
Yes, we will remember his influence he had on young people, and we will use his words to push forward with new leaders to encourage young people to be strong and unwavering in their beliefs.
No, it's actually not.
If we go back and look at what happened, we'll see that they were already trying to create the narrative before they even knew what had happened.
Just breaking now. Charlie Kirk has reportedly been shot in the neck at Utah Vallely University. His status is unknown.
Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was shot on Wednesday at an event in Utah, a source confirmed to Just the News.
Kirk was speaking at an event in Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Deseret News reported. Eyewitnesses stated that he was shot in the neck. His status is unclear.
Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was shot on Wednesday at an event in Utah.
justthenews.com
This was the first thread on this forum, came in on Thursday at 1:45pm which was a day after it happened.
Ironically the first post that blamed the left was from YOU.
"The unhinged left, doing what they do best, getting violent."
At 1:53, maybe 8 minutes or less after you found out, you were blaming the left for it. How much information did you have that it was the left? None. The only evidence you had was a right wing celeb had been killed. That's it.
And you went from that to "it must be the left" in the space of a short time".
Why would you do that?
en.wikipedia.org
"A lack of initial information sparked wild speculation about the killing. Misinformation about the suspect was also widely shared on social media, including a doctored photo of him wearing a pro-Trump shirt, and false claims he was a registered Republican, had donated to Trump's campaign, or was a registered member of the
Democratic Socialists of America."
Both sides had people making up false claims. Why?
Because both sides see the need to control the narrative, get people talking, get people talking about how it was a left winger or a right winger.
You did it, others did it.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION As a mark of respect for the memory of Charlie Kirk, by the authority vested in me as
www.whitehouse.gov
"HONORING THE MEMORY OF CHARLIE KIRK"
"As a mark of respect for the memory of Charlie Kirk, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, September 14, 2025."
Four days of flags at half mast in all territories, states, public buildings, military buildings.
What the ****? Who was Charlie Kirk? Was he ever elected to government? Nope. Did he ever serve in the military? Nope. He was never, ever a public servant.
Melissa Hortman was a politician, from 2005 to 2025, TWENTY YEARS in the Minnesota House of Reps, no flag flying at half mast. Why?
Trump asked if he'd called Tim Walz about it, Trump said "why bother?" or something like that.
He did lower the flag for the kids killed in a church on August 27th, but not for Melissa Hortman.
He also did the Pope, when he died, and that's it in Trump's presidency.
One was a right winger, another was a church, and the last one was the head of the Catholic church.
Do you not see the pattern here?
I could go on, I could provide loads of evidence. You won't.
www.foxnews.com
