Haha...yeah, just "procedural grounds"...like the attorneys withdrawing all claims of fraud...like the attorneys not being able to present any evidence...
You know, little things, haha
Face it...you know less than nothing about any of this, and you are using terms you don't even understand.
I was referring, of course, to procedural grounds like lack of standing. Actually, a pretty ridiculous application of the standing requirement.
I’m sure you have less than no grasp on anything law related, judging by the vacuous crap you spew.
By the way, Fart. If you’d take the time to grasp what I actually wrote, maybe you wouldn’t spend so much time striking at your own straw-man arguments. I never denied that
some of the cases deserved to be tossed on procedural grounds.
Hell, since I’m honest, unlike you, I will go ahead and say it:
some of the cases
were deserving of being tossed on procedural or other grounds. I wouldn’t say that if all such dismissals, however. And — here’s what your too stupid or dishonest to understand or to admit — what I did say was that where a case is dismissed on procedural grounds, it doesn’t get resolved on the merits.
I’m pretty sure that the above will fly miles over your pin head at Mach speed, too.
