Newt Gingrich: We Should ‘Test Every Person Here Who Is of a Muslim Background’

[bripat9643]

If someone commits an act of terrorism, the entire family should be deported. Extended family too. Load them all up.

If they aren't U.S. citizens, then they should be deported regardless. They are all potential terrorists.

 

[Vigilante]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

And what exactly would be the ‘mechanics’ of this ‘test’ – do you want FBI and DHS agents waiting outside of mosques to detain, interrogate, and ‘test’ American citizens who happen to be Muslim for no other reason than their religion.

Are you so ignorant and naïve as to believe that any policy enacted to ‘authorize’ such a ‘test’ would be immediately challenged in court and enjoined from ever being ‘enforced.’

Or is this just more of the right’s demagoguery, attempting to exploit the tragedy in France for some perceived partisan gain by dividing the American people and pursuing a campaign of fear and hate.

The reprehensible right, indeed.

I know you're a ******* asshole, I simply want ones that are NOT CITIZENS gone...AND any of them that came here since 9/11 thoroughly investigated.... perhaps we'll get lucky and the next muslim terrorist will visit you at traffic court!

 

[Vigilante]

"Newt Gingrich: We Should ‘Test Every Person Here Who Is of a Muslim Background’"

Further confirmation of the fear, hate, and bigotry common to most on the right, the contempt most conservatives have for the First Amendment and the rule of law, and the fact that republicans have no business controlling government.

Acts of terror are committed by individuals, not religions; the notion that one is somehow ‘suspect’ simply because of his religion is as ignorant as it is moronic, and clearly un-Constitutional.

I certainly would enjoy hearing about your relationship with a muslim that simply wants to kill you, because you are an American!...And not all muslims are terrorists, but MOST terrorists are muslim!

What you, Gingrich, and other reprehensible rightists are advocating is prima facia un-Constitutional – not that you and other rightwing scum care about that, of course.

THAT shouldn't bother you as your BRO, Obuma does Unconstitutional shit all the time...I gots a pen and I gots a phone.....

 

[Vigilante]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

Newt is a very dangerous man. Before we get on the Gingrich band wagon I think we should all take a hard look at his background and misdeeds. He was involved in some very illegal and immoral dealings that got his ass thrown out of congress by his own party when he was speaker. Anyone that supports Newt and knows the facts of his history is a traitor to our country.

He was cleared of all ethics charges and so was his Foundation.... look it up on the net, he was railroaded by many of the same scum that are the Establishment today....Do you think Trump would even suggest that he would pick Newt if their was any problem.... The story about his wife is also BS, but I can't convince a closed mind on the subject. He was the one responsible for the balanced budget under Blow Job, and, like TRUMP, was NOT a team player, but worked for WE, THE PEOPLE!

Are you talking about Newt or Hillary??

The Clinton Crime Family is still being investigated! Didn't you know?

 

[Slade3200]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

And what exactly would be the ‘mechanics’ of this ‘test’ – do you want FBI and DHS agents waiting outside of mosques to detain, interrogate, and ‘test’ American citizens who happen to be Muslim for no other reason than their religion.

Are you so ignorant and naïve as to believe that any policy enacted to ‘authorize’ such a ‘test’ would be immediately challenged in court and enjoined from ever being ‘enforced.’

Or is this just more of the right’s demagoguery, attempting to exploit the tragedy in France for some perceived partisan gain by dividing the American people and pursuing a campaign of fear and hate.

The reprehensible right, indeed.

It is interesting that the right complains about the lefts lust for big government yet they want the government to monitor, test, and interrogate a large portion of Americans violating their 1st amendment rights for speech and religion along with the privacy rights for all Americans... I guess that's fine as long as nobody touches their guns.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

What about Christian nuts who believe in Biblical law?



Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a short-list finalist to be Donald Trump’s vice presidential running mate, said Thursday that Muslim-Americans should be “tested” and deported if they “believe in Sharia” law.

NEWT OFF THE DEEP END: ‘Test Every Person’ Of Muslim Descent

When did your SO CALLED CHRISTIAN NUTS, go out yelling Allah Snackbar and kill 70 people?..... Please link me up to that!...You ******* idiot!

That it must be explained to you that what you’re advocating is both un-Constitutional and morally wrong is further evidence of just how deranged and repulsive most conservatives are.

What you advocate is contrary to the most fundamental principles of our Republic – that is not who we are as a people, we are better than that; and we are better than what you and others on the right want America to become.

 

[Vigilante]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

And what exactly would be the ‘mechanics’ of this ‘test’ – do you want FBI and DHS agents waiting outside of mosques to detain, interrogate, and ‘test’ American citizens who happen to be Muslim for no other reason than their religion.

Are you so ignorant and naïve as to believe that any policy enacted to ‘authorize’ such a ‘test’ would be immediately challenged in court and enjoined from ever being ‘enforced.’

Or is this just more of the right’s demagoguery, attempting to exploit the tragedy in France for some perceived partisan gain by dividing the American people and pursuing a campaign of fear and hate.

The reprehensible right, indeed.

It is interesting that the right complains about the lefts lust for big government yet they want the government to monitor, test, and interrogate a large portion of Americans violating their 1st amendment rights for speech and religion along with the privacy rights for all Americans... I guess that fine as long as nobody touches their guns.

If you have nothing to fear, why complain? BTW,our second amendment is what protects our 1st amendment!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

And what exactly would be the ‘mechanics’ of this ‘test’ – do you want FBI and DHS agents waiting outside of mosques to detain, interrogate, and ‘test’ American citizens who happen to be Muslim for no other reason than their religion.

Are you so ignorant and naïve as to believe that any policy enacted to ‘authorize’ such a ‘test’ would be immediately challenged in court and enjoined from ever being ‘enforced.’

Or is this just more of the right’s demagoguery, attempting to exploit the tragedy in France for some perceived partisan gain by dividing the American people and pursuing a campaign of fear and hate.

The reprehensible right, indeed.

It is interesting that the right complains about the lefts lust for big government yet they want the government to monitor, test, and interrogate a large portion of Americans violating their 1st amendment rights for speech and religion along with the privacy rights for all Americans... I guess that fine as long as nobody touches their guns.

It’s the hypocrisy common to most on the right.

 

[Slade3200]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

Newt is a very dangerous man. Before we get on the Gingrich band wagon I think we should all take a hard look at his background and misdeeds. He was involved in some very illegal and immoral dealings that got his ass thrown out of congress by his own party when he was speaker. Anyone that supports Newt and knows the facts of his history is a traitor to our country.

He was cleared of all ethics charges and so was his Foundation.... look it up on the net, he was railroaded by many of the same scum that are the Establishment today....Do you think Trump would even suggest that he would pick Newt if their was any problem.... The story about his wife is also BS, but I can't convince a closed mind on the subject. He was the one responsible for the balanced budget under Blow Job, and, like TRUMP, was NOT a team player, but worked for WE, THE PEOPLE!

Are you talking about Newt or Hillary??

The Clinton Crime Family is still being investigated! Didn't you know?

Yeah and they always will with you all running to court to try and prove that Hillarys farts are poisoning the air.

Benghazi done. Emails done. Bring on the next one and you may see a trend... It's just your credibility that goes down, less and less people are going to believe the BS and her support will only rise

 

[Slade3200]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

And what exactly would be the ‘mechanics’ of this ‘test’ – do you want FBI and DHS agents waiting outside of mosques to detain, interrogate, and ‘test’ American citizens who happen to be Muslim for no other reason than their religion.

Are you so ignorant and naïve as to believe that any policy enacted to ‘authorize’ such a ‘test’ would be immediately challenged in court and enjoined from ever being ‘enforced.’

Or is this just more of the right’s demagoguery, attempting to exploit the tragedy in France for some perceived partisan gain by dividing the American people and pursuing a campaign of fear and hate.

The reprehensible right, indeed.

It is interesting that the right complains about the lefts lust for big government yet they want the government to monitor, test, and interrogate a large portion of Americans violating their 1st amendment rights for speech and religion along with the privacy rights for all Americans... I guess that fine as long as nobody touches their guns.

If you have nothing to fear, why complain? BTW,our second amendment is what protects our 1st amendment!

so should we give all the American Muslims guns?

 

[Vigilante]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

What about Christian nuts who believe in Biblical law?



Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a short-list finalist to be Donald Trump’s vice presidential running mate, said Thursday that Muslim-Americans should be “tested” and deported if they “believe in Sharia” law.

NEWT OFF THE DEEP END: ‘Test Every Person’ Of Muslim Descent

When did your SO CALLED CHRISTIAN NUTS, go out yelling Allah Snackbar and kill 70 people?..... Please link me up to that!...You ******* idiot!

That it must be explained to you that what you’re advocating is both un-Constitutional and morally wrong is further evidence of just how deranged and repulsive most conservatives are.

What you advocate is contrary to the most fundamental principles of our Republic – that is not who we are as a people, we are better than that; and we are better than what you and others on the right want America to become.

BULLSHIT, just more of your socialist clap trap that your communist brothers told us what would happen 60 years ago!
Care to deny that this is exactly what the Manchurian muslim is doing, shyster!

 

[Vigilante]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

Newt is a very dangerous man. Before we get on the Gingrich band wagon I think we should all take a hard look at his background and misdeeds. He was involved in some very illegal and immoral dealings that got his ass thrown out of congress by his own party when he was speaker. Anyone that supports Newt and knows the facts of his history is a traitor to our country.

He was cleared of all ethics charges and so was his Foundation.... look it up on the net, he was railroaded by many of the same scum that are the Establishment today....Do you think Trump would even suggest that he would pick Newt if their was any problem.... The story about his wife is also BS, but I can't convince a closed mind on the subject. He was the one responsible for the balanced budget under Blow Job, and, like TRUMP, was NOT a team player, but worked for WE, THE PEOPLE!

Are you talking about Newt or Hillary??

The Clinton Crime Family is still being investigated! Didn't you know?

Yeah and they always will with you all running to court to try and prove that Hillarys farts are poisoning the air.

Benghazi done. Emails done. Bring on the next one and you may see a trend... It's just your credibility that's goes done, less and less people are going to believe the BS and her support will only rise

"Commie" already showed she is a liar, and a national security risk... I guess you don't believe the polls when she loses 11 points to Trump in 2 weeks since those revelations were announced to America...and now her DISAPPROVAL is ....

Hillary Clinton Trustworthiness At Husband’s Lewinsky-era Levels

Breitbart ^ | 14 Jul 2016 | Peter Schweizer
Two of out three Americans say Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy, according to a recent poll by CBS News/The New York Times. Taken in the wake of FBI director James Comey’s criticism of her conduct over the handling of her emails, the poll numbers represent a new high (or low) for the former Secretary of State. The survey reveals that a strong majority of Americans say she did something wrong as it relates to the emails and her private server. Fully 69 percent of the American people think that her use of a private email server was either...

 

[Vigilante]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

And what exactly would be the ‘mechanics’ of this ‘test’ – do you want FBI and DHS agents waiting outside of mosques to detain, interrogate, and ‘test’ American citizens who happen to be Muslim for no other reason than their religion.

Are you so ignorant and naïve as to believe that any policy enacted to ‘authorize’ such a ‘test’ would be immediately challenged in court and enjoined from ever being ‘enforced.’

Or is this just more of the right’s demagoguery, attempting to exploit the tragedy in France for some perceived partisan gain by dividing the American people and pursuing a campaign of fear and hate.

The reprehensible right, indeed.

It is interesting that the right complains about the lefts lust for big government yet they want the government to monitor, test, and interrogate a large portion of Americans violating their 1st amendment rights for speech and religion along with the privacy rights for all Americans... I guess that fine as long as nobody touches their guns.

If you have nothing to fear, why complain? BTW,our second amendment is what protects our 1st amendment!

so should we give all the American Muslims guns?

If they pass a background check, and promise to kill only Latino Gays in a Florida club after the FBI fucked up the check!

 

[Slade3200]

Newt is a very dangerous man. Before we get on the Gingrich band wagon I think we should all take a hard look at his background and misdeeds. He was involved in some very illegal and immoral dealings that got his ass thrown out of congress by his own party when he was speaker. Anyone that supports Newt and knows the facts of his history is a traitor to our country.

He was cleared of all ethics charges and so was his Foundation.... look it up on the net, he was railroaded by many of the same scum that are the Establishment today....Do you think Trump would even suggest that he would pick Newt if their was any problem.... The story about his wife is also BS, but I can't convince a closed mind on the subject. He was the one responsible for the balanced budget under Blow Job, and, like TRUMP, was NOT a team player, but worked for WE, THE PEOPLE!

Are you talking about Newt or Hillary??

The Clinton Crime Family is still being investigated! Didn't you know?

Yeah and they always will with you all running to court to try and prove that Hillarys farts are poisoning the air.

Benghazi done. Emails done. Bring on the next one and you may see a trend... It's just your credibility that's goes done, less and less people are going to believe the BS and her support will only rise

"Commie" already showed she is a liar, and a national security risk... I guess you don't believe the polls when she loses 11 points to Trump in 2 weeks since those revelations were announced to America...and now her DISAPPROVAL is ....

Hillary Clinton Trustworthiness At Husband’s Lewinsky-era Levels

Breitbart ^ | 14 Jul 2016 | Peter Schweizer
Two of out three Americans say Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy, according to a recent poll by CBS News/The New York Times. Taken in the wake of FBI director James Comey’s criticism of her conduct over the handling of her emails, the poll numbers represent a new high (or low) for the former Secretary of State. The survey reveals that a strong majority of Americans say she did something wrong as it relates to the emails and her private server. Fully 69 percent of the American people think that her use of a private email server was either...

She had a short term drop because there was bad judgment on her part, there is no doubt she sucks at technology. You just lost you're jailbird argument so that's done... I'm sure you all will keep bringing it up with other things like the farts... It's gonna get old, and transparent and people will start to side with her because she knows her shit and because she isn't trump... Watch and see.

 

[Slade3200]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

And what exactly would be the ‘mechanics’ of this ‘test’ – do you want FBI and DHS agents waiting outside of mosques to detain, interrogate, and ‘test’ American citizens who happen to be Muslim for no other reason than their religion.

Are you so ignorant and naïve as to believe that any policy enacted to ‘authorize’ such a ‘test’ would be immediately challenged in court and enjoined from ever being ‘enforced.’

Or is this just more of the right’s demagoguery, attempting to exploit the tragedy in France for some perceived partisan gain by dividing the American people and pursuing a campaign of fear and hate.

The reprehensible right, indeed.

It is interesting that the right complains about the lefts lust for big government yet they want the government to monitor, test, and interrogate a large portion of Americans violating their 1st amendment rights for speech and religion along with the privacy rights for all Americans... I guess that fine as long as nobody touches their guns.

If you have nothing to fear, why complain? BTW,our second amendment is what protects our 1st amendment!

so should we give all the American Muslims guns?

If they pass a background check, and promise to kill only Latino Gays in a Florida club after the FBI fucked up the check!

Background checks??? **** that, it's our right... If you got a passport or birth certificate you should get your gun, right??

 

[Norman]

This strategy is ridiculous... stopping the suicidal leftist regessive immigration programs is what needs to actually be done.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

If they aren't U.S. citizens, then they should be deported regardless. They are all potential terrorists.

Don't forget all the Mexicans, potential rapists and drug dealers

And all those black people, potential cop killers

It's the only way you can make 'murica great again....

 

[PoliticalChic]

And.....well before Newt.....

...... the lengths that one must go to to determine the extent of radicalization, according to Tawfik Hamid, in his book, “Inside Jihad,” is to ask if the subject of questioning supports the following:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays

 

[Coyote]

If someone commits an act of terrorism, the entire family should be deported. Extended family too. Load them all up.

You can't deport citizens. We also have such a thing as due process.

 

[Pogo]

Hitting a HOME RUN on this subject.... Holding NOTHING BACK!

And what exactly would be the ‘mechanics’ of this ‘test’ – do you want FBI and DHS agents waiting outside of mosques to detain, interrogate, and ‘test’ American citizens who happen to be Muslim for no other reason than their religion.

Are you so ignorant and naïve as to believe that any policy enacted to ‘authorize’ such a ‘test’ would be immediately challenged in court and enjoined from ever being ‘enforced.’

Or is this just more of the right’s demagoguery, attempting to exploit the tragedy in France for some perceived partisan gain by dividing the American people and pursuing a campaign of fear and hate.

The reprehensible right, indeed.

It is interesting that the right complains about the lefts lust for big government yet they want the government to monitor, test, and interrogate a large portion of Americans violating their 1st amendment rights for speech and religion along with the privacy rights for all Americans... I guess that fine as long as nobody touches their guns.

If you have nothing to fear, why complain? BTW,our second amendment is what protects our 1st amendment!

Uh --- no Sparky. The Constitution is what protects the First Amendment, and that's backed by the Will of the People.

It's not possible to circumvent the Constitution by overpowering some citizen who didn't have a gun. That has no effect. It works more like this:

​

How the hell are you gonna protect us from that ^^ ---- with a gun?