New York judge dismisses Ken Paxton's legal challenge in abortion pills case

[C_Clayton_Jones]

‘A New York judge dismissed a legal challenge Friday from Texas seeking to enforce a more than $100,000 civil judgment against a doctor accused of prescribing abortion pills to a Dallas-area woman in an early test of the state’s “shield law” designed to protect providers.

Republican Texas State Attorney General Ken Paxton wanted a New York court to enforce a civil decision from Texas against Dr. Margaret Carpenter, who practices north of New York City in Ulster County, for allegedly prescribing abortion medication via telemedicine.

But acting Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck refused to file the judgment, saying he was a government employee who had to comply with New York’s shield law, which protects providers from other states’ reach.’

New York tosses Ken Paxton challenge in abortion pills case

The Texas attorney general wanted a New York court to enforce a civil judgment against a doctor accused of prescribing abortion pills. The suit was a test of New York’s “shield law.”

www.texastribune.org

The dismissal is a victory for individual liberty and states’ rights.

This is also an example of the hypocrisy of the right; overturning Roe was supposed to be about ‘letting the states decide’ – New York made the decision to recognize the right to privacy and reproductive autonomy.

Authoritarian red states like Texas need to respect the laws of free blue states.

 

[OKTexas]

‘A New York judge dismissed a legal challenge Friday from Texas seeking to enforce a more than $100,000 civil judgment against a doctor accused of prescribing abortion pills to a Dallas-area woman in an early test of the state’s “shield law” designed to protect providers.

Republican Texas State Attorney General Ken Paxton wanted a New York court to enforce a civil decision from Texas against Dr. Margaret Carpenter, who practices north of New York City in Ulster County, for allegedly prescribing abortion medication via telemedicine.

But acting Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck refused to file the judgment, saying he was a government employee who had to comply with New York’s shield law, which protects providers from other states’ reach.’

New York tosses Ken Paxton challenge in abortion pills case

The Texas attorney general wanted a New York court to enforce a civil judgment against a doctor accused of prescribing abortion pills. The suit was a test of New York’s “shield law.”

www.texastribune.org

The dismissal is a victory for individual liberty and states’ rights.

This is also an example of the hypocrisy of the right; overturning Roe was supposed to be about ‘letting the states decide’ – New York made the decision to recognize the right to privacy and reproductive autonomy.

Authoritarian red states like Texas need to respect the laws of free blue states.

So what you're saying is fascist NY is taking a major dump on the US Constitution? The clerk will lose to a constitutional challenge. And you try to portray yourself as some legal eagle and constitutional genius, ROFLMFAO.

.

 

[Harry Dresden]

So what you're saying is fascist NY is taking a major dump on the US Constitution? The clerk will lose to a constitutional challenge. And you try to portray yourself as some legal eagle and constitutional genius, ROFLMFAO.

.

jones is a dipshit....and a bigot....

 

[Doc7505]

‘A New York judge dismissed a legal challenge Friday from Texas seeking to enforce a more than $100,000 civil judgment against a doctor accused of prescribing abortion pills to a Dallas-area woman in an early test of the state’s “shield law” designed to protect providers.

Republican Texas State Attorney General Ken Paxton wanted a New York court to enforce a civil decision from Texas against Dr. Margaret Carpenter, who practices north of New York City in Ulster County, for allegedly prescribing abortion medication via telemedicine.

But acting Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck refused to file the judgment, saying he was a government employee who had to comply with New York’s shield law, which protects providers from other states’ reach.’

New York tosses Ken Paxton challenge in abortion pills case

The Texas attorney general wanted a New York court to enforce a civil judgment against a doctor accused of prescribing abortion pills. The suit was a test of New York’s “shield law.”

www.texastribune.org

The dismissal is a victory for individual liberty and states’ rights.

This is also an example of the hypocrisy of the right; overturning Roe was supposed to be about ‘letting the states decide’ – New York made the decision to recognize the right to privacy and reproductive autonomy.

Authoritarian red states like Texas need to respect the laws of free blue states.

~~~~~~>
Typical Leftist Judge ruling..

 

[Zincwarrior]

Extremely expected. NY and Cali both installed protection legislation for abortion docs and pharmacies for just such a contingency.

 

[elektra]

The dismissal is a victory for individual liberty and states’ rights

No, this is a victory for the same people that make the Covid vaccine. This is a big pharmaceutical victory.

How dare a state refuse a mail order product that kills the baby and hurts or kills the mother.

This is back alley abortion and lawlessness.

 

[elektra]

‘This is also an example of the hypocrisy of the right; overturning Roe was supposed to be about ‘letting the states decide’ – New York made the decision to recognize the right to privacy and reproductive autonomy.

This part is funny cause of your stupidity.

You interpret, let the states decide as the democrat states, New York state in this case deciding to break Texas laws