New term introduced to fool the low info voter

[deltex1]

Obabble wants to give 500 million to "appropriately vetted" rebels in Syria
...lots of luck there Gertrude...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/w...o-train-and-equip-syrian-opposition.html?_r=0

 

[deltex1]

According to Bill Ayers we couldn't properly vet Saddam Hussein...how we gonna vet Mohammed in the desert?

 

[The VOR]

According to Bill Ayers we couldn't properly vet Saddam Hussein...how we gonna vet Mohammed in the desert?

Pretty sad when you have to keep bumping your own posts just to garner a little attention.

 

[shart_attack]

Obabble wants to give 500 million to "appropriately vetted" rebels in Syria
...lots of luck there Gertrude...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/w...o-train-and-equip-syrian-opposition.html?_r=0

C'mon, deltex: you could at least post the story for us in a quote, bro.

 

[deltex1]

According to Bill Ayers we couldn't properly vet Saddam Hussein...how we gonna vet Mohammed in the desert?

Pretty sad when you have to keep bumping your own posts just to garner a little attention.

Repetition is the key to learning for morons such as yourself.

 

[deltex1]

Obabble wants to give 500 million to "appropriately vetted" rebels in Syria
...lots of luck there Gertrude...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/w...o-train-and-equip-syrian-opposition.html?_r=0

C'mon, deltex: you could at least post the story for us in a quote, bro.

I gave you a link,sis...what more do you need?

 

[TruthSeeker56]

Other terms specifically used to attract the "low-info voter":

"Climate Change"

"The 1%"

"Reproductive Rights"

"Cash For Clunkers"

"Obamacare"

 

[The Rabbi]

I wonder if Obama will insist on universal background checks before handing out fully automatic weapons.
He's OK with Syrian rebels having them. Americans, not so much.