Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
How did you hold your lunch down when Hillary said "it's wrong to pit people against each other?"
I don't think that hurt Trump at all. He talks that way and those quotes were all out of context. I think we all know that, including leftists. Trump says things like "they hit you, you hit them." And leftists report that as Trump said "you hit them" as if he meant to initiate force when he actually said to return it
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
How did you hold your lunch down when Hillary said "it's wrong to pit people against each other?"
I don't think that hurt Trump at all. He talks that way and those quotes were all out of context. I think we all know that, including leftists. Trump says things like "they hit you, you hit them." And leftists report that as Trump said "you hit them" as if he meant to initiate force when he actually said to return it
I thought it was a GOOD ad for a change, and this was way at the beginning of the campaign. I was giving credit where credit was due. That doesn't mean I would ever vote for Hillary Clinton. Who knows though, maybe if she had kept going down that particular path instead of turning to the "dark side" and all the ridiculous Russians talk, she may have won.
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
How did you hold your lunch down when Hillary said "it's wrong to pit people against each other?"
I don't think that hurt Trump at all. He talks that way and those quotes were all out of context. I think we all know that, including leftists. Trump says things like "they hit you, you hit them." And leftists report that as Trump said "you hit them" as if he meant to initiate force when he actually said to return it
I thought it was a GOOD ad for a change, and this was way at the beginning of the campaign. I was giving credit where credit was due. That doesn't mean I would ever vote for Hillary Clinton. Who knows though, maybe if she had kept going down that particular path instead of turning to the "dark side" and all the ridiculous Russians talk, she may have won.
I do know you're not a Hillary supporter, I didn't mean to imply that.
And yes, she lost because she was a horrible candidate. Trump pointed that out too. The electoral map is stacked for Democrats. The Democrat has to be beyond incompetent to lose.
But on the ad, I agree that if I didn't know anything about either candidate, then it would be a good ad. But I do and that Hillary is lying about being against negative campaigning and she's lying about what Trump said by manipulating the quote with the context. Everything Trump said was about his supporters defending themselves from attacks by violent leftists. I never saw a quote where he said to take the violence to them.
And the video of the rallies backs that up. It's the violent leftists that the police had to keep away from Trump supporters, not the reverse. Particularly poignant was a black cop who said the leftists were violent, abusive and out of control. Of course the leftist media doesn't care because they like it
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
How did you hold your lunch down when Hillary said "it's wrong to pit people against each other?"
I don't think that hurt Trump at all. He talks that way and those quotes were all out of context. I think we all know that, including leftists. Trump says things like "they hit you, you hit them." And leftists report that as Trump said "you hit them" as if he meant to initiate force when he actually said to return it
I thought it was a GOOD ad for a change, and this was way at the beginning of the campaign. I was giving credit where credit was due. That doesn't mean I would ever vote for Hillary Clinton. Who knows though, maybe if she had kept going down that particular path instead of turning to the "dark side" and all the ridiculous Russians talk, she may have won.
I do know you're not a Hillary supporter, I didn't mean to imply that.
And yes, she lost because she was a horrible candidate. Trump pointed that out too. The electoral map is stacked for Democrats. The Democrat has to be beyond incompetent to lose.
But on the ad, I agree that if I didn't know anything about either candidate, then it would be a good ad. But I do and that Hillary is lying about being against negative campaigning and she's lying about what Trump said by manipulating the quote with the context. Everything Trump said was about his supporters defending themselves from attacks by violent leftists. I never saw a quote where he said to take the violence to them.
And the video of the rallies backs that up. It's the violent leftists that the police had to keep away from Trump supporters, not the reverse. Particularly poignant was a black cop who said the leftists were violent, abusive and out of control. Of course the leftist media doesn't care because they like it
Well sure, she started off okay and then totally screwed herself going off on "the Russians" and the "sexual assaulter" rampages. People want to hear what you are going to do for them as a candidate. I think most, aside from the hard political party supporters, are sick and tired of this back and forth nonsense. Run on your issues, on your platform, on what you believe in, and stop trying to convince us that you are "better" than the other guy. JMHO.
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
How did you hold your lunch down when Hillary said "it's wrong to pit people against each other?"
I don't think that hurt Trump at all. He talks that way and those quotes were all out of context. I think we all know that, including leftists. Trump says things like "they hit you, you hit them." And leftists report that as Trump said "you hit them" as if he meant to initiate force when he actually said to return it
I thought it was a GOOD ad for a change, and this was way at the beginning of the campaign. I was giving credit where credit was due. That doesn't mean I would ever vote for Hillary Clinton. Who knows though, maybe if she had kept going down that particular path instead of turning to the "dark side" and all the ridiculous Russians talk, she may have won.
I do know you're not a Hillary supporter, I didn't mean to imply that.
And yes, she lost because she was a horrible candidate. Trump pointed that out too. The electoral map is stacked for Democrats. The Democrat has to be beyond incompetent to lose.
But on the ad, I agree that if I didn't know anything about either candidate, then it would be a good ad. But I do and that Hillary is lying about being against negative campaigning and she's lying about what Trump said by manipulating the quote with the context. Everything Trump said was about his supporters defending themselves from attacks by violent leftists. I never saw a quote where he said to take the violence to them.
And the video of the rallies backs that up. It's the violent leftists that the police had to keep away from Trump supporters, not the reverse. Particularly poignant was a black cop who said the leftists were violent, abusive and out of control. Of course the leftist media doesn't care because they like it
Well sure, she started off okay and then totally screwed herself going off on "the Russians" and the "sexual assaulter" rampages. People want to hear what you are going to do for them as a candidate. I think most, aside from the hard political party supporters, are sick and tired of this back and forth nonsense. Run on your issues, on your platform, on what you believe in, and stop trying to convince us that you are "better" than the other guy. JMHO.
Sadly the negative campaigning dominates because it works. It doesn't change minds, but it lights fires under their (both sides) supporters to show up
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
Ummm--- how is this an "attack" ad?
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
Ummm--- how is this an "attack" ad?
How did you hold your lunch down when Hillary said "it's wrong to pit people against each other?"
I don't think that hurt Trump at all. He talks that way and those quotes were all out of context. I think we all know that, including leftists. Trump says things like "they hit you, you hit them." And leftists report that as Trump said "you hit them" as if he meant to initiate force when he actually said to return it
I thought it was a GOOD ad for a change, and this was way at the beginning of the campaign. I was giving credit where credit was due. That doesn't mean I would ever vote for Hillary Clinton. Who knows though, maybe if she had kept going down that particular path instead of turning to the "dark side" and all the ridiculous Russians talk, she may have won.
I do know you're not a Hillary supporter, I didn't mean to imply that.
And yes, she lost because she was a horrible candidate. Trump pointed that out too. The electoral map is stacked for Democrats. The Democrat has to be beyond incompetent to lose.
But on the ad, I agree that if I didn't know anything about either candidate, then it would be a good ad. But I do and that Hillary is lying about being against negative campaigning and she's lying about what Trump said by manipulating the quote with the context. Everything Trump said was about his supporters defending themselves from attacks by violent leftists. I never saw a quote where he said to take the violence to them.
And the video of the rallies backs that up. It's the violent leftists that the police had to keep away from Trump supporters, not the reverse. Particularly poignant was a black cop who said the leftists were violent, abusive and out of control. Of course the leftist media doesn't care because they like it
Well sure, she started off okay and then totally screwed herself going off on "the Russians" and the "sexual assaulter" rampages. People want to hear what you are going to do for them as a candidate. I think most, aside from the hard political party supporters, are sick and tired of this back and forth nonsense. Run on your issues, on your platform, on what you believe in, and stop trying to convince us that you are "better" than the other guy. JMHO.
Sadly the negative campaigning dominates because it works. It doesn't change minds, but it lights fires under their (both sides) supporters to show up
One of these days we will have some viable 3rd party candidates to choose instead of the usual pieces of slop the dems and reps present us with.
Both parties are holding the country hostage, yes.I think that most Americans, like me, are getting really sick and tired of this whole democrat versus republican BS. These lunatics are holding the country hostage.
I thought it was a GOOD ad for a change, and this was way at the beginning of the campaign. I was giving credit where credit was due. That doesn't mean I would ever vote for Hillary Clinton. Who knows though, maybe if she had kept going down that particular path instead of turning to the "dark side" and all the ridiculous Russians talk, she may have won.
I do know you're not a Hillary supporter, I didn't mean to imply that.
And yes, she lost because she was a horrible candidate. Trump pointed that out too. The electoral map is stacked for Democrats. The Democrat has to be beyond incompetent to lose.
But on the ad, I agree that if I didn't know anything about either candidate, then it would be a good ad. But I do and that Hillary is lying about being against negative campaigning and she's lying about what Trump said by manipulating the quote with the context. Everything Trump said was about his supporters defending themselves from attacks by violent leftists. I never saw a quote where he said to take the violence to them.
And the video of the rallies backs that up. It's the violent leftists that the police had to keep away from Trump supporters, not the reverse. Particularly poignant was a black cop who said the leftists were violent, abusive and out of control. Of course the leftist media doesn't care because they like it
Well sure, she started off okay and then totally screwed herself going off on "the Russians" and the "sexual assaulter" rampages. People want to hear what you are going to do for them as a candidate. I think most, aside from the hard political party supporters, are sick and tired of this back and forth nonsense. Run on your issues, on your platform, on what you believe in, and stop trying to convince us that you are "better" than the other guy. JMHO.
Sadly the negative campaigning dominates because it works. It doesn't change minds, but it lights fires under their (both sides) supporters to show up
One of these days we will have some viable 3rd party candidates to choose instead of the usual pieces of slop the dems and reps present us with.
As long as the Electrical College "winner take all" scam is in place there will be no 3P candy that ever gets a legitimate chance. That's part of what the WTA system does --- it perpetuates Duopoly and shuts out 3P candies. The nature of the system makes such a dichotomy inevitable.
The only 3P POTUS candies that have made any splash at all over the last century -- Perot, Anderson, Wallace, Thurmond --- have done so with the strategy of not winning but siphoning off enough EVs to leave nobody with a majority, throwing the decision to the H of R. Perot pulled a fifth of the pop vote and didn't even get one EV. No 3P has out-drawn either Duopoly party since Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, and he was a former POTUS.
The system is rigged, and it's rigged to perpetuate Duopoly. Until we fix that system, Duopoly is all we'll ever get. Because as long as you know it's a lock to elect either your party or theirs, you don't need to give voters a reason to vote for yours; all you have to do is give them reasons to not vote for theirs. Since we all know any given state is voting either all-D or all-R, that leaves no other choice.
How did you hold your lunch down when Hillary said "it's wrong to pit people against each other?"
I don't think that hurt Trump at all. He talks that way and those quotes were all out of context. I think we all know that, including leftists. Trump says things like "they hit you, you hit them." And leftists report that as Trump said "you hit them" as if he meant to initiate force when he actually said to return it
I thought it was a GOOD ad for a change, and this was way at the beginning of the campaign. I was giving credit where credit was due. That doesn't mean I would ever vote for Hillary Clinton. Who knows though, maybe if she had kept going down that particular path instead of turning to the "dark side" and all the ridiculous Russians talk, she may have won.
I do know you're not a Hillary supporter, I didn't mean to imply that.
And yes, she lost because she was a horrible candidate. Trump pointed that out too. The electoral map is stacked for Democrats. The Democrat has to be beyond incompetent to lose.
But on the ad, I agree that if I didn't know anything about either candidate, then it would be a good ad. But I do and that Hillary is lying about being against negative campaigning and she's lying about what Trump said by manipulating the quote with the context. Everything Trump said was about his supporters defending themselves from attacks by violent leftists. I never saw a quote where he said to take the violence to them.
And the video of the rallies backs that up. It's the violent leftists that the police had to keep away from Trump supporters, not the reverse. Particularly poignant was a black cop who said the leftists were violent, abusive and out of control. Of course the leftist media doesn't care because they like it
Well sure, she started off okay and then totally screwed herself going off on "the Russians" and the "sexual assaulter" rampages. People want to hear what you are going to do for them as a candidate. I think most, aside from the hard political party supporters, are sick and tired of this back and forth nonsense. Run on your issues, on your platform, on what you believe in, and stop trying to convince us that you are "better" than the other guy. JMHO.
Sadly the negative campaigning dominates because it works. It doesn't change minds, but it lights fires under their (both sides) supporters to show up
One of these days we will have some viable 3rd party candidates to choose instead of the usual pieces of slop the dems and reps present us with.
Has anyone seen this? I just saw it for the first time yesterday. Wow! As much as I can't stand the Democrats and the Republicans, this ad makes The Donald look really pretty bad.
Having said that, I am tired of attack ads. Tell us what YOU are going to do!
Ummm--- how is this an "attack" ad?
Pogo
In political campaigns, an attack ad is an advertisement whose message is designed to wage a personal attack against an opposing candidate or political party in order to gain support for theattacking candidate and attract voters.
Attack ad - Wikipedia
I thought it was a GOOD ad for a change, and this was way at the beginning of the campaign. I was giving credit where credit was due. That doesn't mean I would ever vote for Hillary Clinton. Who knows though, maybe if she had kept going down that particular path instead of turning to the "dark side" and all the ridiculous Russians talk, she may have won.
I do know you're not a Hillary supporter, I didn't mean to imply that.
And yes, she lost because she was a horrible candidate. Trump pointed that out too. The electoral map is stacked for Democrats. The Democrat has to be beyond incompetent to lose.
But on the ad, I agree that if I didn't know anything about either candidate, then it would be a good ad. But I do and that Hillary is lying about being against negative campaigning and she's lying about what Trump said by manipulating the quote with the context. Everything Trump said was about his supporters defending themselves from attacks by violent leftists. I never saw a quote where he said to take the violence to them.
And the video of the rallies backs that up. It's the violent leftists that the police had to keep away from Trump supporters, not the reverse. Particularly poignant was a black cop who said the leftists were violent, abusive and out of control. Of course the leftist media doesn't care because they like it
Well sure, she started off okay and then totally screwed herself going off on "the Russians" and the "sexual assaulter" rampages. People want to hear what you are going to do for them as a candidate. I think most, aside from the hard political party supporters, are sick and tired of this back and forth nonsense. Run on your issues, on your platform, on what you believe in, and stop trying to convince us that you are "better" than the other guy. JMHO.
Sadly the negative campaigning dominates because it works. It doesn't change minds, but it lights fires under their (both sides) supporters to show up
One of these days we will have some viable 3rd party candidates to choose instead of the usual pieces of slop the dems and reps present us with.
As long as the Electrical College "winner take all" scam is in place there will be no 3P candy that ever gets a legitimate chance. That's part of what the WTA system does --- it perpetuates Duopoly and shuts out 3P candies. The nature of the system makes such a dichotomy inevitable.
The only 3P POTUS candies that have made any splash at all over the last century -- Perot, Anderson, Wallace, Thurmond --- have done so with the strategy of not winning but siphoning off enough EVs to leave nobody with a majority, throwing the decision to the H of R. Perot pulled a fifth of the pop vote and didn't even get one EV. No 3P has out-drawn either Duopoly party since Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, and he was a former POTUS.
The system is rigged, and it's rigged to perpetuate Duopoly. Until we fix that system, Duopoly is all we'll ever get. Because as long as you know it's a lock to elect either your party or theirs, you don't need to give voters a reason to vote for yours; all you have to do is give them reasons to not vote for theirs. Since we all know any given state is voting either all-D or all-R, that leaves no other choice.
I do know you're not a Hillary supporter, I didn't mean to imply that.
And yes, she lost because she was a horrible candidate. Trump pointed that out too. The electoral map is stacked for Democrats. The Democrat has to be beyond incompetent to lose.
But on the ad, I agree that if I didn't know anything about either candidate, then it would be a good ad. But I do and that Hillary is lying about being against negative campaigning and she's lying about what Trump said by manipulating the quote with the context. Everything Trump said was about his supporters defending themselves from attacks by violent leftists. I never saw a quote where he said to take the violence to them.
And the video of the rallies backs that up. It's the violent leftists that the police had to keep away from Trump supporters, not the reverse. Particularly poignant was a black cop who said the leftists were violent, abusive and out of control. Of course the leftist media doesn't care because they like it
Well sure, she started off okay and then totally screwed herself going off on "the Russians" and the "sexual assaulter" rampages. People want to hear what you are going to do for them as a candidate. I think most, aside from the hard political party supporters, are sick and tired of this back and forth nonsense. Run on your issues, on your platform, on what you believe in, and stop trying to convince us that you are "better" than the other guy. JMHO.
Sadly the negative campaigning dominates because it works. It doesn't change minds, but it lights fires under their (both sides) supporters to show up
One of these days we will have some viable 3rd party candidates to choose instead of the usual pieces of slop the dems and reps present us with.
As long as the Electrical College "winner take all" scam is in place there will be no 3P candy that ever gets a legitimate chance. That's part of what the WTA system does --- it perpetuates Duopoly and shuts out 3P candies. The nature of the system makes such a dichotomy inevitable.
The only 3P POTUS candies that have made any splash at all over the last century -- Perot, Anderson, Wallace, Thurmond --- have done so with the strategy of not winning but siphoning off enough EVs to leave nobody with a majority, throwing the decision to the H of R. Perot pulled a fifth of the pop vote and didn't even get one EV. No 3P has out-drawn either Duopoly party since Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, and he was a former POTUS.
The system is rigged, and it's rigged to perpetuate Duopoly. Until we fix that system, Duopoly is all we'll ever get. Because as long as you know it's a lock to elect either your party or theirs, you don't need to give voters a reason to vote for yours; all you have to do is give them reasons to not vote for theirs. Since we all know any given state is voting either all-D or all-R, that leaves no other choice.
It's not just that. It's the candidates that are being presented. That is a BIG part of the problem.
I do know you're not a Hillary supporter, I didn't mean to imply that.
And yes, she lost because she was a horrible candidate. Trump pointed that out too. The electoral map is stacked for Democrats. The Democrat has to be beyond incompetent to lose.
But on the ad, I agree that if I didn't know anything about either candidate, then it would be a good ad. But I do and that Hillary is lying about being against negative campaigning and she's lying about what Trump said by manipulating the quote with the context. Everything Trump said was about his supporters defending themselves from attacks by violent leftists. I never saw a quote where he said to take the violence to them.
And the video of the rallies backs that up. It's the violent leftists that the police had to keep away from Trump supporters, not the reverse. Particularly poignant was a black cop who said the leftists were violent, abusive and out of control. Of course the leftist media doesn't care because they like it
Well sure, she started off okay and then totally screwed herself going off on "the Russians" and the "sexual assaulter" rampages. People want to hear what you are going to do for them as a candidate. I think most, aside from the hard political party supporters, are sick and tired of this back and forth nonsense. Run on your issues, on your platform, on what you believe in, and stop trying to convince us that you are "better" than the other guy. JMHO.
Sadly the negative campaigning dominates because it works. It doesn't change minds, but it lights fires under their (both sides) supporters to show up
One of these days we will have some viable 3rd party candidates to choose instead of the usual pieces of slop the dems and reps present us with.
As long as the Electrical College "winner take all" scam is in place there will be no 3P candy that ever gets a legitimate chance. That's part of what the WTA system does --- it perpetuates Duopoly and shuts out 3P candies. The nature of the system makes such a dichotomy inevitable.
The only 3P POTUS candies that have made any splash at all over the last century -- Perot, Anderson, Wallace, Thurmond --- have done so with the strategy of not winning but siphoning off enough EVs to leave nobody with a majority, throwing the decision to the H of R. Perot pulled a fifth of the pop vote and didn't even get one EV. No 3P has out-drawn either Duopoly party since Teddy Roosevelt in 1912, and he was a former POTUS.
The system is rigged, and it's rigged to perpetuate Duopoly. Until we fix that system, Duopoly is all we'll ever get. Because as long as you know it's a lock to elect either your party or theirs, you don't need to give voters a reason to vote for yours; all you have to do is give them reasons to not vote for theirs. Since we all know any given state is voting either all-D or all-R, that leaves no other choice.
It's not just that. It's the candidates that are being presented. That is a BIG part of the problem.
