New discovery Hey, more ice .... not less and here is proof

[Robert W]

Yes, recent discovered old photos prove there is more ice and not less. Don't worry about climate.
Discuss if you will how the discovery helped you have a better life. Before this, per your words, you have a worse life due to less ice. Well try to not get drunk with joy. Enjoy your fears being banished.

 

[Dante]

Yes, recent discovered old photos prove there is more ice and not less. Don't worry about climate.
Discuss if you will how the discovery helped you have a better life. Before this, per your words, you have a worse life due to less ice. Well try to not get drunk with joy. Enjoy your fears being banished.

CDN

The Climate Discussion Nexus offers a forum for more open debate on all aspects of climate change, especially better use of science to shape policy. You can subscribe to our newsletter at www.climatediscussionnexus.com, like us on Facebook (ClimateDN), follow us on Twitter (@ClimateDN), and...

www.youtube.com

 

[Dante]

Skeptics say the dumbest things.

"In this episode of Skeptics say the dumbest things, we fact-check and debunk climate skeptic John Robson of the Climate Discussion Nexus (CDN). Does CO2 follow warming? Does CO2 cause climate change? What about the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period? If you want the scientific rebuttal to these arguments, watch on!"

 

[jackflash]

Yes, recent discovered old photos prove there is more ice and not less. Don't worry about climate.
Discuss if you will how the discovery helped you have a better life. Before this, per your words, you have a worse life due to less ice. Well try to not get drunk with joy. Enjoy your fears being banished.

50 Years of Failed Doomsday, Eco-pocalyptic Predictions; the So-called 'experts' Are 0-50

This week Myron Ebell (director of the Center for Energy and Environment at the Competitive Enterprise Institute) and Steven J. Milloy published a post on the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) blog titled “Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions:” Modern doomsayers have...

www.aei.org

 

[Dante]

50 Years of Failed Doomsday, Eco-pocalyptic Predictions; the So-called 'experts' Are 0-50

This week Myron Ebell (director of the Center for Energy and Environment at the Competitive Enterprise Institute) and Steven J. Milloy published a post on the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) blog titled “Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions:” Modern doomsayers have...

www.aei.org

Skeptics say the dumbest things.

 

[Crick]

Yes, recent discovered old photos prove there is more ice and not less. Don't worry about climate.
Discuss if you will how the discovery helped you have a better life. Before this, per your words, you have a worse life due to less ice. Well try to not get drunk with joy. Enjoy your fears being banished.

Recently discovered old photos? Really? How many photos Robert? Is the Statue of Liberty visible in any of them? Plymouth Rock?

ARCTIC

Polar Science Center » PIOMAS Arctic Sea Ice Volume Reanalysis

psc.apl.uw.edu

GREENLAND

Greenland ice sheet mass balance from 1840 through next week

Abstract. The mass of the Greenland ice sheet is declining as mass gain from snow accumulation is exceeded by mass loss from surface meltwater runoff, marine-terminating glacier calving and submarine melting, and basal melting. Here we use the input–output (IO) method to estimate mass change...

essd.copernicus.org

ANTARCTICA

Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017 - Nature

The Antarctic Ice Sheet is an important indicator of climate change and driver of sea-level rise. Here we combine satellite observations of its changing volume, flow and gravitational attraction with modelling of its surface mass balance to show that it lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion tonnes of ice...

www.nature.com

GLOBAL

Global Cryosphere Watch - Glacier and Ice Cap Assessment

globalcryospherewatch.org

 

[Robert W]

Recently discovered old photos? Really? How many photos Robert? Is the Statue of Liberty visible in any of them? Plymouth Rock?

So few you can look at them. Is the Statue of Liberty at the Antarctic? I sense you truly are not capable of research.

 

[Crick]

So few you can look at them. Is the Statue of Liberty at the Antarctic? I sense you truly are not capable of research.

I will tell you who is not capable of research: someone who has made up their mind in advance and refuses to follow the evidence.

 

[deannalw]

Yes, recent discovered old photos prove there is more ice and not less. Don't worry about climate.
Discuss if you will how the discovery helped you have a better life. Before this, per your words, you have a worse life due to less ice. Well try to not get drunk with joy. Enjoy your fears being banished.

Ever since the 70's, when they tried to convince all of us that global cooling was gonna kill us all- I decided not to worry about what they were saying about climate.

 

[Crick]

Yes, recent discovered old photos prove there is more ice and not less. Don't worry about climate.
Discuss if you will how the discovery helped you have a better life. Before this, per your words, you have a worse life due to less ice. Well try to not get drunk with joy. Enjoy your fears being banished.

Don't you worry about that bus. You won't fall off that edge. That food's not spoiled. I'm sure that bear won't bother us. He knows we're going to turn left. This space heater is completely safe in here. I don't smell any gas. That gun's not loaded.

 

[EMH]

Yes, recent discovered old photos prove there is more ice and not less. Don't worry about climate.
Discuss if you will how the discovery helped you have a better life. Before this, per your words, you have a worse life due to less ice. Well try to not get drunk with joy. Enjoy your fears being banished.

This is precisely what Surface Air Pressure proves, and was clearly documented in

1. the British Court 2007

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.

2. NASA

Study: Mass gains of Antarctic ice sheet greater than losses - NASA Science

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

science.nasa.gov

 

[Robert W]

Ever since the 70's, when they tried to convince all of us that global cooling was gonna kill us all- I decided not to worry about what they were saying about climate.

There are fortunes being made by trying to scare us into submitting to the climate alarmists. And what is sad is they don't care one bit that they harm Americans in the process.

 

[deannalw]

There are fortunes being made by trying to scare us into submitting to the climate alarmists. And what is sad is they don't care one bit that they harm Americans in the process.

Exactly!

 

[Robert W]

I will tell you who is not capable of research: someone who has made up their mind in advance and refuses to follow the evidence.

That is the best self analysis I have read ever. I have put that same thought to you many times.

 

[Crick]

There are fortunes being made by trying to scare us into submitting to the climate alarmists. And what is sad is they don't care one bit that they harm Americans in the process.

How do you believe I would harm Americans?

 

[Robert W]

How do you believe I would harm Americans?

Why don't you care?

 

[ReinyDays]

Ice is bad ... burn tires ...

 

[Crick]

Why don't you care?

Why don't I care about what?

 

[Robert W]

Why don't I care about what?

Something.

 

[Crick]

Something.

I care about my family and the rest of humanity. Why are you so willing to take the word of a discredited loner against the word of thousands of scientists when the question under consideration is the future in which your children will live? Does that really seem like the place to take a risky bet?