LIAR!!!!!!That’s what ICE did. They just killed a guy that didn’t even have a ******* gun. Shoot first, ask questions later.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIAR!!!!!!That’s what ICE did. They just killed a guy that didn’t even have a ******* gun. Shoot first, ask questions later.
BS.They don't do that without a very good reason.
Training.
LIAR!!!!He obstructed nothing
They were attacking a woman who had been videoing them
He was trying to protect her
That is the truth.LIAR!!!!!!
They were attempting to arrest someone, when he jumped inHe obstructed nothing
They were attacking a woman who had been videoing them
He was trying to protect her
And your evidence of that claim? You're spouting emotional bs.Pretending it’s all about dangerous illegal immigrants is a lie and you know it. They’re there to kick out anyone they can, including individuals who have broken no law and done everything according to the rules.
Based on?And ICE does not seem bothered by breaking laws in pursuit of this agenda.
Well,No one was impeding their actions that day, least of all Pretti. The thug had to cross all the way to the other side of the street just to shove a woman to the ground. Tell me what purpose that assault served. Was it essential to fulfilling their mission?
I saw it...Not conclusive.You didn’t see the video, or didn’t want to see the video? God forbid you think for yourself.
Again your opinion.He didn’t fight them. They attacked him. Next thing he knows 7 guys are wrestling him to the ground and one shoots him in the back.
Did the officer that shot know he was disarmed? Got a link?
We'll see. And I already said if that is indeed the case, I be with you.That’s what ICE did. They just killed a guy that didn’t even have a ******* gun. Shoot first, ask questions later.
It happens....Split second decision. Still, it would have to be adjugated....He thought he had a gun, but he didn’t.
“Whoopsie, I thought he was armed lol. My bad.”
That makes it ok, right?
Bullshit… they were shooting mace into the face of people who were videoing them and knocking them downThey were attempting to arrest someone, when he jumped in
That’s obstructing.
But he did have a gun…another officer had to disarm him. It was a semi automatic pistol with a 20 mag and he had a extra 20 round mag on himHe thought he had a gun, but he didn’t.
“Whoopsie, I thought he was armed lol. My bad.”
That makes it ok, right?
We'll see. And I already said if that is indeed the case, I be with you.
So, we can put you in the lynch em column?The argument the Trump supporters are making is just stupid. Basically, they argue that this particular administration can do whatever it wants to American citizens, and we are just supposed to accept it. Because the 2 people who have been killed in Minnesota were law-abiding, legal, homegrown American citizens. CBD was not in the process of arresting a ilegal immigrant who was documented by the court as a criminal. They pushed a woman who was protesting to the ground. She was NOT impeding anything. Nor was the guy they murdered. That's what the video shows, and no matter what kind of lie any MAGAT tries to repeat, that is what's on tape. If the government continues this, things are not going to go well for ANYONE who continues to enable them.
Nope they were trying to arrest someone when the armed agitator and others attempt to obstruct their arrestBullshit… they were shooting mace into the face of people who were videoing them and knocking them down
A gun that he no longer had when he was murderedBut he did have a gun…another officer had to disarm him. It was a semi automatic pistol with a 20 mag and he had a extra 20 round mag on him
Hard to say what he was intending to do with all that ammo
But he did have a gun…another officer had to disarm him.
You’re lying againNope they were trying to arrest someone when the armed agitator and others attempt to obstruct their arrest
What you were saying...And I am not questioning anything until I see what the determinations are...As for waiting, I am not a vigilante....I believe in the rule of law.We’ll see, regarding what, exactly?
What part are you questioning and why are you waiting for what they tell you to think instead of looking into it yourself?