If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.
From
your link:
Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.
“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”
Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.
The emails former Secretary of State
Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained “gaps,” according to internal department messages evaluating her production.
Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by
Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.
Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account she’d used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.
The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message
Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 — a month before she left office.
Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of
Mrs. Clinton’s messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as “gaps.”
Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from
Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.
“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec.
Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary
Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary
Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”
Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from
Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict
Mrs. Clinton’s assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.
“The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,” said Tom Fitton, president of
Judicial Watch. “I suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.”
The emails obtained by
Judicial Watch give more details about the documents
Mrs. Clinton turned over — 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.
One March 23, 2015, letter to
Mrs. Clinton’s personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the department’s early thoughts about the documents.
The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said
Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents
