Iran is sworn to destroy the West. Nothing else need be considered.
And the US is destroying the Middle East, see the difference? One is, the other says it wants to. Which is worse?
Just how is America destroying the M.E. when the arab muslims have already destroyed it ?
Hmm, let's see. Taking down Saddam, making a political vacuum. Why was Saddam in place? Oh, because the British made Iraq with a Saudi in as king, great idea.
Whatever Muslims are doing there, often it's as a result of the policies the west have implemented in the first place. But hey, you can ignore that stuff right?
Maybe you should research your history a little more as Britain did not make Iraq that was the LoN and France. And it was Syria and Jordan that had the Saudi princes made into kings, Iraq was ruled by a native.
So the west forced 1400 years of mass murder, rape and violence on the indigenous peoples of the M.E did they, or is it you denying the reality of the M.E because it does not suit your islamonazi propaganda ?
Er.....
The League of Nations gave Britain a mandate in 1920. Then there was a revolt and the mandate was scrapped with a British administered semi-independent nation put in place. The Anglo-Iraqi Treaty was signed by Britain and Iraq which gave this semi-independence except in foreign affairs and military affairs. Then another treaty in 1930 was signed. Then Iraq gained independence in 1932.
The League of Nations basically acted on behalf of the French and British who carved up the old Ottoman Empire. To suggest the League of Nations did something is like saying the UN invaded Iraq in 2003.
Iraq was ruled by the Hashemites, who controlled Mecca, which happens to be in Saudi Arabia.
In 1932 King Faisal I of Iraq was in charge and had been since 1921. (well, in charge in as much as it was the british). He was born in Mecca. Died in Switzerland. Grew up in Istanbul. Hardly Iraqi, was he?