Net neutrality

[ThunderKiss1965]

Real simple to me. If Cher and Alyssa Milano and Mark Ruffalo are FOR Net Neutrality, then I am against it. Not hard for me.

For some it may be more complicated than that.

Here are some explanations. One is a rather simple explanation.

Here is another explanation.


Here is the test if you are ever confused about anything. If the left are for it, be against it. If the left are against it, be for it.

You will be on the right side every time. No exceptions.

Here is another test. When it comes to economic issues, you can be sure if the conservatives are for it, it will benefit big business interests at the expense of the little guy and consumer. If you go with the ;liberal position, you will be on the side of the average Joe.

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Who is Paul Watson , just another Alex Jones.Paul Joseph Watson - Wikipedia

`
Some people are so dumbed down they will absolutely believe in anything so long as it supports their ideology. As I stated before, these people are clueless as to what net neutrality is.
`
`
Here is one good explanation;
`
`

`
`​

Without net neutrality, the telecoms are free to charge extra for the same service internet users now enjoy free and on top of that, charge the web site to be listed on their service.
`
`

`​

`
​

Without net neutrality, the telcoms can block, throttle or cut back on anyone or any site they choose.
`
`
`

​

Bandwidth isn't free. Someone has to pay for it.
If you don't want to pay for bandwidth maybe you should communicate with ham radio.

If your a Liberal you can randomly scream at the sky other Liberals will understand.

 

[Nia88]

Real simple to me. If Cher and Alyssa Milano and Mark Ruffalo are FOR Net Neutrality, then I am against it. Not hard for me.

For some it may be more complicated than that.

Here are some explanations. One is a rather simple explanation.



Here is another explanation.



Here is the test if you are ever confused about anything. If the left are for it, be against it. If the left are against it, be for it.

You will be on the right side every time. No exceptions.

Opposing something just because someone comes from a different party is just dumb. I don't like a lot of celebrities but if they say something logical, then Ill agree with them.

so you seldom agree with them.

It depends on who the celebrity is.

 

[Indeependent]

When this is giving up later this month companies will be able to control what you can see and do on the internet. It will become less free.

It is bs.

You claim to know science but know jack shit about the internet. A little knowledge and there is no company or country on earth that can control your access. View attachment 164711

An ISP can control your access.

An ISP can't control my access I'm not your average computer user. Regardless i would rather have an ISP who lives or dies by the market than a Federal agency that doesn't answer to anyone.

What a cop out answer for a law abiding Conservative.
You will use illegal settings to get more than your ISP is selling you.
Thanks for swallowing your own bullshit.

 

[Indeependent]

Real simple to me. If Cher and Alyssa Milano and Mark Ruffalo are FOR Net Neutrality, then I am against it. Not hard for me.

For some it may be more complicated than that.

Here are some explanations. One is a rather simple explanation.

Here is another explanation.


Here is the test if you are ever confused about anything. If the left are for it, be against it. If the left are against it, be for it.

You will be on the right side every time. No exceptions.

Here is another test. When it comes to economic issues, you can be sure if the conservatives are for it, it will benefit big business interests at the expense of the little guy and consumer. If you go with the ;liberal position, you will be on the side of the average Joe.

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

It has as far as NN is concerned.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

When this is giving up later this month companies will be able to control what you can see and do on the internet. It will become less free.

It is bs.

You claim to know science but know jack shit about the internet. A little knowledge and there is no company or country on earth that can control your access. View attachment 164711

An ISP can control your access.

An ISP can't control my access I'm not your average computer user. Regardless i would rather have an ISP who lives or dies by the market than a Federal agency that doesn't answer to anyone.

What a cop out answer for a law abiding Conservative.
You will use illegal settings to get more than your ISP is selling you.
Thanks for swallowing your own bullshit.

No I don't like being tracked.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Real simple to me. If Cher and Alyssa Milano and Mark Ruffalo are FOR Net Neutrality, then I am against it. Not hard for me.

For some it may be more complicated than that.

Here are some explanations. One is a rather simple explanation.

Here is another explanation.


Here is the test if you are ever confused about anything. If the left are for it, be against it. If the left are against it, be for it.

You will be on the right side every time. No exceptions.

Here is another test. When it comes to economic issues, you can be sure if the conservatives are for it, it will benefit big business interests at the expense of the little guy and consumer. If you go with the ;liberal position, you will be on the side of the average Joe.

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

It has as far as NN is concerned.

Really how has it done that ?

 

[Indeependent]

No I believe the government should keep their dick beaters off of things that are easily decided by the free market.

`
`
In other words, a) you have no clue as to what "net neutrality" is about and b) you are blindly and without question, a slave to ideological rhetoric. I'm not surprised by either. Another case of the far right, cutting off its nose, to spite its face.

the left would never do such a thing!!!

but as usual, the left is about control at all times. REGULATION!

will internet companies get restrictive? only if they want to lose customers. stop telling people how to ******* live their lives or run their business 24x7.

You're delusional.
Why do you think Cable is losing subscribers?
They offer options no one wants and charge an arm and a leg.

 

[Indeependent]

Real simple to me. If Cher and Alyssa Milano and Mark Ruffalo are FOR Net Neutrality, then I am against it. Not hard for me.

For some it may be more complicated than that.

Here are some explanations. One is a rather simple explanation.

Here is another explanation.


Here is the test if you are ever confused about anything. If the left are for it, be against it. If the left are against it, be for it.

You will be on the right side every time. No exceptions.

Here is another test. When it comes to economic issues, you can be sure if the conservatives are for it, it will benefit big business interests at the expense of the little guy and consumer. If you go with the ;liberal position, you will be on the side of the average Joe.

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

It has as far as NN is concerned.

Really how has it done that ?

The fact that you're asking that question after reading all this Thread proves you're a mindless robot ideologue.
And please respond to the fact that you would cheat on a contract with an ISP.

 

[iceberg]

No I believe the government should keep their dick beaters off of things that are easily decided by the free market.

`
`
In other words, a) you have no clue as to what "net neutrality" is about and b) you are blindly and without question, a slave to ideological rhetoric. I'm not surprised by either. Another case of the far right, cutting off its nose, to spite its face.

the left would never do such a thing!!!

but as usual, the left is about control at all times. REGULATION!

will internet companies get restrictive? only if they want to lose customers. stop telling people how to ******* live their lives or run their business 24x7.

You're delusional.
Why do you think Cable is losing subscribers?
They offer options no one wants and charge an arm and a leg.

i wasn't talking about cable, i was talking about the left.

keep up.

 

[Theowl32]

Real simple to me. If Cher and Alyssa Milano and Mark Ruffalo are FOR Net Neutrality, then I am against it. Not hard for me.

For some it may be more complicated than that.

Here are some explanations. One is a rather simple explanation.

Here is another explanation.


Here is the test if you are ever confused about anything. If the left are for it, be against it. If the left are against it, be for it.

You will be on the right side every time. No exceptions.

Here is another test. When it comes to economic issues, you can be sure if the conservatives are for it, it will benefit big business interests at the expense of the little guy and consumer. If you go with the ;liberal position, you will be on the side of the average Joe.

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

It has as far as NN is concerned.

Really how has it done that ?

The fact that you're asking that question after reading all this Thread proves you're a mindless robot ideologue.
And please respond to the fact that you would cheat on a contract with an ISP.

So the free market is the reason? The fact people fall for this notion that GOVERNMENT is better than the free market tells me all i need to know.

This is yet another way for leftists to use class warfare to get control. What do they want control of? Everything, if you really want to know.

This is how it is done. Blame CORPORATIONS, or WHITE REPUBLICANS, or CHRISTIANS, etc etc in order to gain control.

Net Neutrality is about the government getting control and that means they can dictate everything.

If any good socialist has the ability to think what the long term ramifications are just ONCE.

 

[Indeependent]

No I believe the government should keep their dick beaters off of things that are easily decided by the free market.

`
`
In other words, a) you have no clue as to what "net neutrality" is about and b) you are blindly and without question, a slave to ideological rhetoric. I'm not surprised by either. Another case of the far right, cutting off its nose, to spite its face.

the left would never do such a thing!!!

but as usual, the left is about control at all times. REGULATION!

will internet companies get restrictive? only if they want to lose customers. stop telling people how to ******* live their lives or run their business 24x7.

You're delusional.
Why do you think Cable is losing subscribers?
They offer options no one wants and charge an arm and a leg.

i wasn't talking about cable, i was talking about the left.

keep up.

I'm talking about the reailty of the Free Market to rip off it's customers when possible.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

No I believe the government should keep their dick beaters off of things that are easily decided by the free market.

`
`
In other words, a) you have no clue as to what "net neutrality" is about and b) you are blindly and without question, a slave to ideological rhetoric. I'm not surprised by either. Another case of the far right, cutting off its nose, to spite its face.

the left would never do such a thing!!!

but as usual, the left is about control at all times. REGULATION!

will internet companies get restrictive? only if they want to lose customers. stop telling people how to ******* live their lives or run their business 24x7.

You're delusional.
Why do you think Cable is losing subscribers?
They offer options no one wants and charge an arm and a leg.

Cable is losing subscribers because of better mobile options

 

[Indeependent]

Here is another test. When it comes to economic issues, you can be sure if the conservatives are for it, it will benefit big business interests at the expense of the little guy and consumer. If you go with the ;liberal position, you will be on the side of the average Joe.

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

It has as far as NN is concerned.

Really how has it done that ?

The fact that you're asking that question after reading all this Thread proves you're a mindless robot ideologue.
And please respond to the fact that you would cheat on a contract with an ISP.

So the free market is the reason? The fact people fall for this notion that GOVERNMENT is better than the free market tells me all i need to know.

This is yet another way for leftists to use class warfare to get control. What do they want control of? Everything, if you really want to know.

This is how it is done. Blame CORPORATIONS, or WHITE REPUBLICANS, or CHRISTIANS, etc etc in order to gain control.

Net Neutrality is about the government getting control and that means they can dictate everything.

If any good socialist has the ability to think what the long term ramifications are just ONCE.

Please enumerate all the evil details of NN.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Real simple to me. If Cher and Alyssa Milano and Mark Ruffalo are FOR Net Neutrality, then I am against it. Not hard for me.

For some it may be more complicated than that.

Here are some explanations. One is a rather simple explanation.

Here is another explanation.


Here is the test if you are ever confused about anything. If the left are for it, be against it. If the left are against it, be for it.

You will be on the right side every time. No exceptions.

Here is another test. When it comes to economic issues, you can be sure if the conservatives are for it, it will benefit big business interests at the expense of the little guy and consumer. If you go with the ;liberal position, you will be on the side of the average Joe.

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

It has as far as NN is concerned.

Really how has it done that ?

The fact that you're asking that question after reading all this Thread proves you're a mindless robot ideologue.
And please respond to the fact that you would cheat on a contract with an ISP.

No all you have done is regurgitate leftist talking points

 

[Indeependent]

No I believe the government should keep their dick beaters off of things that are easily decided by the free market.

`
`
In other words, a) you have no clue as to what "net neutrality" is about and b) you are blindly and without question, a slave to ideological rhetoric. I'm not surprised by either. Another case of the far right, cutting off its nose, to spite its face.

the left would never do such a thing!!!

but as usual, the left is about control at all times. REGULATION!

will internet companies get restrictive? only if they want to lose customers. stop telling people how to ******* live their lives or run their business 24x7.

You're delusional.
Why do you think Cable is losing subscribers?
They offer options no one wants and charge an arm and a leg.

Cable is losing subscribers because of better mobile options

Ans why are mobile options better?
NN!
Now explain why a good Conservative would break the rules of a contract with an ISP even though I know you wish you didn't post that you would do such.

 

[Indeependent]

Here is another test. When it comes to economic issues, you can be sure if the conservatives are for it, it will benefit big business interests at the expense of the little guy and consumer. If you go with the ;liberal position, you will be on the side of the average Joe.

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

It has as far as NN is concerned.

Really how has it done that ?

The fact that you're asking that question after reading all this Thread proves you're a mindless robot ideologue.
And please respond to the fact that you would cheat on a contract with an ISP.

No all you have done is regurgitate leftist talking points

And all you have done is confessed that you're a thief.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

It has as far as NN is concerned.

Really how has it done that ?

The fact that you're asking that question after reading all this Thread proves you're a mindless robot ideologue.
And please respond to the fact that you would cheat on a contract with an ISP.

So the free market is the reason? The fact people fall for this notion that GOVERNMENT is better than the free market tells me all i need to know.

This is yet another way for leftists to use class warfare to get control. What do they want control of? Everything, if you really want to know.

This is how it is done. Blame CORPORATIONS, or WHITE REPUBLICANS, or CHRISTIANS, etc etc in order to gain control.

Net Neutrality is about the government getting control and that means they can dictate everything.

If any good socialist has the ability to think what the long term ramifications are just ONCE.

Please enumerate all the evil details of NN.

FCC regulation that's all that needs to be said.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

No I believe the government should keep their dick beaters off of things that are easily decided by the free market.

`
`
In other words, a) you have no clue as to what "net neutrality" is about and b) you are blindly and without question, a slave to ideological rhetoric. I'm not surprised by either. Another case of the far right, cutting off its nose, to spite its face.

the left would never do such a thing!!!

but as usual, the left is about control at all times. REGULATION!

will internet companies get restrictive? only if they want to lose customers. stop telling people how to ******* live their lives or run their business 24x7.

You're delusional.
Why do you think Cable is losing subscribers?
They offer options no one wants and charge an arm and a leg.

Cable is losing subscribers because of better mobile options

Ans why are mobile options better?
NN!
Now explain why a good Conservative would break the rules of a contract with an ISP even though I know you wish you didn't post that you would do such.

Net neutrality doesn't affect mobile the way it does broadband you ass.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Because government control has always helped out the little guy.

It has as far as NN is concerned.

Really how has it done that ?

The fact that you're asking that question after reading all this Thread proves you're a mindless robot ideologue.
And please respond to the fact that you would cheat on a contract with an ISP.

No all you have done is regurgitate leftist talking points

And all you have done is confessed that you're a thief.

Whatever fucktard just keep on letting the Government tell you what, where, when, and how.