shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 37,722
- 36,242
- 2,905
First, to the headline in this post. If demographics is all the far-left crazies believe matter and 92% of black females are voting for Harris. If they suggest that men or people of a different race who voted for Trump based on race and/or misogyny, wouldn't Trump have won with FAR more votes considering how much of the population is not in her demographic favour? Shouldn't they have also voted for Trump at a 92% clip?
The media focusing and race and gender really bothers me greatly because it is truly Marxist at its core. If, say, Condeleeza Rice were running in a general election, do you want to bet she would have received more votes than either Hillary or Harris? I would bet all my worldly belongings she would have if the right political conditions allowed.
Why? Her policies and her presence as a legitimate leader of substance. Repeat that for effect. A legitimate leader of substance. Even she has stated that Trumps term was not bad. She is not Neo-Con in her bones, she is fact based in her decision making for the most part.
The media focusing and race and gender really bothers me greatly because it is truly Marxist at its core. If, say, Condeleeza Rice were running in a general election, do you want to bet she would have received more votes than either Hillary or Harris? I would bet all my worldly belongings she would have if the right political conditions allowed.
Why? Her policies and her presence as a legitimate leader of substance. Repeat that for effect. A legitimate leader of substance. Even she has stated that Trumps term was not bad. She is not Neo-Con in her bones, she is fact based in her decision making for the most part.
Last edited: