NC has responded to the Feds

[ThoughtCrimes]

Well except for the fact that you're the one that pointed to Title IX of "the CRA", so TN was right , now you're changing your reference, the U.S. code you're pointing to wasn't derived from the CRA (of either 64 or 68) but instead was derived from Tile IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.(signed into law by President Nixon).

That is a distinction without a difference. The CRA was AMENDED AGAIN in 1972. It has nothing to do with bigoted judges which was TN's bogus claim. Basic jurist jurisprudence - an amendment to a law becomes part of that law. The Education Amendments became part of the CRA. Q. E. D.

BTW, the EA only amended title 7.
This is from wiki
Title IX[edit]
Title IX made it easier[how?] to move civil rights cases from state courts with segregationist judges[who?] and all-white juries to federal court. This was of crucial importance to civil rights activists[who?] who contended that they could not get fair trials in state courts.[citation needed]
Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 should not be confused with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, which prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded education programs and activities.

Even your own citation says you are wrong TN! You mistakenly claim;

BTW, the EA only amended title 7

Your Wiki citation states clearly the references Education Amendments amending Title IX which are codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688 which are part of the CRA. However, the edit notes are not part of the main article for good reason because they were challenged for cause. If you believe they are correct, then you are going to have to find a valid source. Why in the Hell do people source Wikipedia?

 

[Seawytch]

North Carolina sues Justice Department over HB2 - CNNPolitics.com

They are saying that the feds have it wrong, that transgender issues are not the same as the civil rights issues that were addressed in the sixties, and they're absolutely 100 percent correct.

Great picture. Now post a picture of what sexual predators do in the bathroom ...

Why? One has nothing to do with the other. 17 states and 200 localities actually have laws allowing trans folks to use the bathroom of the gender they are transitioning to. Show us where your fears supported by actual incidents.

Savage shot her down pretty quickly, pointing out that predators don’t need to dress up as another gender in order to assault someone.

“That’s bullshit,” he responded. “A child molester doesn’t need to put on a dress to go into a bathroom. You can Google ‘sexually assaulted in a restroom’ and you get thousands of examples of cisgendered straight men.”

Dan Savage Takes On Ann Coulter Over Transgender Bathroom Rights

 

[NightFox]

I don't want to provide free access to girls bathrooms to sexual predators and let guns go flap their dicks in front of them so that transgenders want to feel comfortable around the people who they are crapping and peeing with. Wow, obviously I'm the one here with issues with not caring about people ...

Er..ummm.. What was stopping those "sexual predators" from going into the girls bathrooms prior to this NC Law?

Seriously? Before the laws giving transsexuals access to their "biological" bathroom, you could be WTF. Now you shut up or get sued. You didn't get that? Really?

Ummm.. the feds are claiming that the relevant law protecting this supposed "right" (in the case of federally funded education institutions) has been in effect since 1972 and prior to that (as far as I can tell) there were no relevant laws one way or the other (so the individual could legally do whatever they wanted as long as it didn't violate the rights of others), so again how does passing a law such as what NC passed do anything to stop these "sexual predators" isn't sexual predation already illegal and hasn't that been the case for a very long time? Why would anybody automatically assume that transgendered individuals are more likely to commit a sexual assault in a bathroom than anybody else?

I don't agree with the "discrimination" claim here (not from a legal, logical, common sense or moral perspective) but as far as I can see this doesn't change the status of sexual predators nor discourage them from committing their crime of choice in any way.

 

[TNHarley]

Well except for the fact that you're the one that pointed to Title IX of "the CRA", so TN was right , now you're changing your reference, the U.S. code you're pointing to wasn't derived from the CRA (of either 64 or 68) but instead was derived from Tile IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.(signed into law by President Nixon).

That is a distinction without a difference. The CRA was AMENDED AGAIN in 1972. It has nothing to do with bigoted judges which was TN's bogus claim. Basic jurist jurisprudence - an amendment to a law becomes part of that law. The Education Amendments became part of the CRA. Q. E. D.

BTW, the EA only amended title 7.
This is from wiki
Title IX[edit]
Title IX made it easier[how?] to move civil rights cases from state courts with segregationist judges[who?] and all-white juries to federal court. This was of crucial importance to civil rights activists[who?] who contended that they could not get fair trials in state courts.[citation needed]
Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 should not be confused with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, which prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded education programs and activities.

Even your own citation says you are wrong TN! You mistakenly claim;

BTW, the EA only amended title 7

Your Wiki citation states clearly the references Education Amendments amending Title IX which are codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688 which are part of the CRA. However, the edit notes are not part of the main article for good reason because they were challenged for cause. If you believe they are correct, then you are going to have to find a valid source. Why in the Hell do people source Wikipedia?

no it doesn't..
Still not elaboration of how this is discrimination? I have to say, at this point, I am not surprised

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Well except for the fact that you're the one that pointed to Title IX of "the CRA", so TN was right , now you're changing your reference, the U.S. code you're pointing to wasn't derived from the CRA (of either 64 or 68) but instead was derived from Tile IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.(signed into law by President Nixon).

That is a distinction without a difference. The CRA was AMENDED AGAIN in 1972. It has nothing to do with bigoted judges which was TN's bogus claim. Basic jurist jurisprudence - an amendment to a law becomes part of that law. The Education Amendments became part of the CRA. Q. E. D.

I am guessing you just cant explain how that Act is even relevant

Since you're guessing, I can unequivocally state you are in error! Again your deflection by employing another straw man is noted. I supplied you with everything you need. Edify thyself!

FOR GAWD SAKES YOU DUMBFUCK
HOW is a law making sexes use their proper sex designated bathrooms discriminatory?

Another non-response. You fucking demand me to respond, but your dumb ass doesn't do anything but obfuscate and prop up a straw man or two. IF you can't answer that question then God Bless you at that hour of need!

 

[Seawytch]

HB2 is unconstitutional on its face. See Romer v Evans.

 

[TNHarley]

Well except for the fact that you're the one that pointed to Title IX of "the CRA", so TN was right , now you're changing your reference, the U.S. code you're pointing to wasn't derived from the CRA (of either 64 or 68) but instead was derived from Tile IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.(signed into law by President Nixon).

That is a distinction without a difference. The CRA was AMENDED AGAIN in 1972. It has nothing to do with bigoted judges which was TN's bogus claim. Basic jurist jurisprudence - an amendment to a law becomes part of that law. The Education Amendments became part of the CRA. Q. E. D.

I am guessing you just cant explain how that Act is even relevant

Since you're guessing, I can unequivocally state you are in error! Again your deflection by employing another straw man is noted. I supplied you with everything you need. Edify thyself!

FOR GAWD SAKES YOU DUMBFUCK
HOW is a law making sexes use their proper sex designated bathrooms discriminatory?

Another non-response. You fucking demand me to respond, but your dumb ass doesn't do anything but obfuscate and prop up a straw man or two. IF you can't answer that question then God Bless you at that hour of need!

you cant even show me how that fuckin Act is somehow relative to this situation. You fail bro. Big time
How is asking how the act you are claiming is relative, a strawman?

 

[TNHarley]

HB2 is unconstitutional on its face. See Romer v Evans.

how is that the same?

 

[kaz]

North Carolina sues Justice Department over HB2 - CNNPolitics.com

They are saying that the feds have it wrong, that transgender issues are not the same as the civil rights issues that were addressed in the sixties, and they're absolutely 100 percent correct.

Great picture. Now post a picture of what sexual predators do in the bathroom ...

Why? One has nothing to do with the other. 17 states and 200 localities actually have laws allowing trans folks to use the bathroom of the gender they are transitioning to. Show us where your fears supported by actual incidents.

Savage shot her down pretty quickly, pointing out that predators don’t need to dress up as another gender in order to assault someone.

“That’s bullshit,” he responded. “A child molester doesn’t need to put on a dress to go into a bathroom. You can Google ‘sexually assaulted in a restroom’ and you get thousands of examples of cisgendered straight men.”

Dan Savage Takes On Ann Coulter Over Transgender Bathroom Rights

A sexual predator gets up, walks across the room into a room with middle school and teenage girls. What stops them? Their conscience?

You do run and run and run from that question

 

[NightFox]

How is asking how the act you are claiming is relative, a strawman?

Just 'cause bitch, now shut up and go cook me a chicken pot pie.

 

[TNHarley]

How is asking how the act you are claiming is relative, a strawman?

Just 'cause bitch, now shut up and go cook me a chicken pot pie.

I would not want to be your cell mate in prison!
Lol im so retarded

 

[Seawytch]

Dept. of Ed.: Title IX Protects Trans Students

 

[daws101]

and they are suing the Justice Dept.
Waiting for a link
It is breaking on reuters

Homophobes turning another state into a national disgrace.

Fed. Judge is blocking enforcement of the law.

Local cops don't like the law -- it's anything but "Christian".

Homo doesn't = transgender
More ignorant parroting.

You know this how?
You talking about parroting is damn funny.
Originally is an alien concept to .
Matter of fact, the concept of a concept is alien to you too.

 

[TNHarley]

Dept. of Ed.: Title IX Protects Trans Students

HOW IS IT DISCRIMINATION?

 

[Seawytch]

North Carolina sues Justice Department over HB2 - CNNPolitics.com

They are saying that the feds have it wrong, that transgender issues are not the same as the civil rights issues that were addressed in the sixties, and they're absolutely 100 percent correct.

Great picture. Now post a picture of what sexual predators do in the bathroom ...

Why? One has nothing to do with the other. 17 states and 200 localities actually have laws allowing trans folks to use the bathroom of the gender they are transitioning to. Show us where your fears supported by actual incidents.

Savage shot her down pretty quickly, pointing out that predators don’t need to dress up as another gender in order to assault someone.

“That’s bullshit,” he responded. “A child molester doesn’t need to put on a dress to go into a bathroom. You can Google ‘sexually assaulted in a restroom’ and you get thousands of examples of cisgendered straight men.”

Dan Savage Takes On Ann Coulter Over Transgender Bathroom Rights

A sexual predator gets up, walks across the room into a room with middle school and teenage girls. What stops them? Their conscience?

You do run and run and run from that question

Anti Trans laws don't stop them. Anti Trans laws don't protect anyone and are designed to hurt trans people.

As Dan Savage pointed out, "Google sexually assaulted in a restroom’ and you get thousands of examples of cisgendered straight men.”

 

[Seawytch]

Dept. of Ed.: Title IX Protects Trans Students

HOW IS IT DISCRIMINATION?

It is a violation of Title IX as linked. April, 2014.

HB2 also violates Romer.

 

[daws101]

North Carolina sues Justice Department over HB2 - CNNPolitics.com

They are saying that the feds have it wrong, that transgender issues are not the same as the civil rights issues that were addressed in the sixties, and they're absolutely 100 percent correct.

Great picture. Now post a picture of what sexual predators do in the bathroom ...

Why? One has nothing to do with the other. 17 states and 200 localities actually have laws allowing trans folks to use the bathroom of the gender they are transitioning to. Show us where your fears supported by actual incidents.

Savage shot her down pretty quickly, pointing out that predators don’t need to dress up as another gender in order to assault someone.

“That’s bullshit,” he responded. “A child molester doesn’t need to put on a dress to go into a bathroom. You can Google ‘sexually assaulted in a restroom’ and you get thousands of examples of cisgendered straight men.”

Dan Savage Takes On Ann Coulter Over Transgender Bathroom Rights

A sexual predator gets up, walks across the room into a room with middle school and teenage girls. What stops them? Their conscience?

You do run and run and run from that question

False! That's not a relavent questions in this discussion.

 

[TNHarley]

North Carolina sues Justice

Dept. of Ed.: Title IX Protects Trans Students

HOW IS IT DISCRIMINATION?

It is a violation of Title IX as linked. April, 2014.

HB2 also violates Romer.

Jesus Christ man.
HOW IS IT DISCRIMINATION?

 

[NightFox]

How is asking how the act you are claiming is relative, a strawman?

Just 'cause bitch, now shut up and go cook me a chicken pot pie.

I would not want to be your cell mate in prison!

Damn TN....

 

[daws101]

Read the case law .