NBC News: Kamala Is Collapsing Along the Blue Wall

Status
Not open for further replies.

Billiejeens

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
52,477
Reaction score
38,549
Points
3,545
Enough with the red mirage of 2022, which has become the Democrats’ favorite crutch amid a failing Kamala Harris campaign.

You cannot compare a midterm and presidential election cycle—it’s beyond absurd that some, especially pollsters, take this pivot seriously.

When Trump is on the ballot, the dynamics change. That’s undeniable, but I also understand it’s a coping mechanism.

Democrats thought Kamala would be crushing Donald Trump.

Now, two weeks from Election Day, she’s looking shaky along the Blue Wall, her campaign is bearish in North Carolina, and things are not shaping up too well in Nevada, where Republican early voting has reached levels never seen in the Reid Machine era.

And now, we have aides saying it’s a five-alarm fire in Michigan (via NBC News):

Recent discussions have centered on the possibility of an anomaly happening this year with just part of the blue wall breaking its way. The conversations have focused on whether Michigan or Wisconsin “fall” to former President Donald Trump while the two other states go blue, according to three sources with knowledge of the campaign’s strategy.

Losing Wisconsin or Michigan would mean that even if Harris secures Pennsylvania — where both Harris and Trump have spent the most time and resources — she would not reach the necessary 270 electoral votes to win the White House without winning another battleground state or possibly two.

“There has been a thought that maybe Michigan or Wisconsin will fall off,” said a senior Harris campaign official, who stressed that the bigger concern is over Michigan. Two other people with knowledge of campaign strategy — who, like others in this article, were granted anonymity to speak candidly — also underscored deep concern about Michigan. Those people still believe that all the states are close and that there are alternative routes to victory.

[…]



But also potentially troubling for Democrats: What Harris’ campaign had thought was one of its best insurance possibilities may also be in peril. Just a few weeks ago, several Harris advisers in interviews pointed to the combination of electoral votes from North Carolina and Nevada as a strong alternative path for Harris should Trump win Pennsylvania and claim its 19 electoral votes.

While North Carolina is still in the campaign’s sights and Democrats maintain strong organization and leadership there, the Harris team is far less bullish about victory, four people with knowledge of the dynamics said.

“Of all of the seven [states], that one seems to be a little bit slipping away,” the Harris campaign official said of North Carolina.

[…]

Since Harris’ entry, the campaign has looked at the blue wall states as central to her election path, but it has also considered states like Nevada as essential in bulking up a win even if Democrats uphold the blue wall, in case legal challenges arise, according to three campaign officials.

In the remaining states of Nevada, Arizona and Georgia, the election remains close or Harris is down, according to public polling. Surveys have found Trump leading in Arizona and Georgia and Harris slightly up in Nevada.


BJ-

Swing states are lost to her-
Blue wall crumbling
Record turnouts in Republican Early Voting

President Trump could actually get more votes in total than Harris.
She is a slightly less likeable, and way less of a politician than Hilliary.
 
Enough with the red mirage of 2022, which has become the Democrats’ favorite crutch amid a failing Kamala Harris campaign.

You cannot compare a midterm and presidential election cycle—it’s beyond absurd that some, especially pollsters, take this pivot seriously.

When Trump is on the ballot, the dynamics change. That’s undeniable, but I also understand it’s a coping mechanism.

Democrats thought Kamala would be crushing Donald Trump.

Now, two weeks from Election Day, she’s looking shaky along the Blue Wall, her campaign is bearish in North Carolina, and things are not shaping up too well in Nevada, where Republican early voting has reached levels never seen in the Reid Machine era.

And now, we have aides saying it’s a five-alarm fire in Michigan (via NBC News):

Recent discussions have centered on the possibility of an anomaly happening this year with just part of the blue wall breaking its way. The conversations have focused on whether Michigan or Wisconsin “fall” to former President Donald Trump while the two other states go blue, according to three sources with knowledge of the campaign’s strategy.

Losing Wisconsin or Michigan would mean that even if Harris secures Pennsylvania — where both Harris and Trump have spent the most time and resources — she would not reach the necessary 270 electoral votes to win the White House without winning another battleground state or possibly two.

“There has been a thought that maybe Michigan or Wisconsin will fall off,” said a senior Harris campaign official, who stressed that the bigger concern is over Michigan. Two other people with knowledge of campaign strategy — who, like others in this article, were granted anonymity to speak candidly — also underscored deep concern about Michigan. Those people still believe that all the states are close and that there are alternative routes to victory.

[…]



But also potentially troubling for Democrats: What Harris’ campaign had thought was one of its best insurance possibilities may also be in peril. Just a few weeks ago, several Harris advisers in interviews pointed to the combination of electoral votes from North Carolina and Nevada as a strong alternative path for Harris should Trump win Pennsylvania and claim its 19 electoral votes.

While North Carolina is still in the campaign’s sights and Democrats maintain strong organization and leadership there, the Harris team is far less bullish about victory, four people with knowledge of the dynamics said.

“Of all of the seven [states], that one seems to be a little bit slipping away,” the Harris campaign official said of North Carolina.

[…]

Since Harris’ entry, the campaign has looked at the blue wall states as central to her election path, but it has also considered states like Nevada as essential in bulking up a win even if Democrats uphold the blue wall, in case legal challenges arise, according to three campaign officials.

In the remaining states of Nevada, Arizona and Georgia, the election remains close or Harris is down, according to public polling. Surveys have found Trump leading in Arizona and Georgia and Harris slightly up in Nevada.


BJ-

Swing states are lost to her-
Blue wall crumbling
Record turnouts in Republican Early Voting

President Trump could actually get more votes in total than Harris.
She is a slightly less likeable, and way less of a politician than Hilliary.
If Dems didn’t cheat in elections this would be worse than Mondale:


.



IMG_7723.webp
 
Enough with the red mirage of 2022, which has become the Democrats’ favorite crutch amid a failing Kamala Harris campaign.

You cannot compare a midterm and presidential election cycle—it’s beyond absurd that some, especially pollsters, take this pivot seriously.

When Trump is on the ballot, the dynamics change. That’s undeniable, but I also understand it’s a coping mechanism.

Democrats thought Kamala would be crushing Donald Trump.

Now, two weeks from Election Day, she’s looking shaky along the Blue Wall, her campaign is bearish in North Carolina, and things are not shaping up too well in Nevada, where Republican early voting has reached levels never seen in the Reid Machine era.

And now, we have aides saying it’s a five-alarm fire in Michigan (via NBC News):

Recent discussions have centered on the possibility of an anomaly happening this year with just part of the blue wall breaking its way. The conversations have focused on whether Michigan or Wisconsin “fall” to former President Donald Trump while the two other states go blue, according to three sources with knowledge of the campaign’s strategy.

Losing Wisconsin or Michigan would mean that even if Harris secures Pennsylvania — where both Harris and Trump have spent the most time and resources — she would not reach the necessary 270 electoral votes to win the White House without winning another battleground state or possibly two.

“There has been a thought that maybe Michigan or Wisconsin will fall off,” said a senior Harris campaign official, who stressed that the bigger concern is over Michigan. Two other people with knowledge of campaign strategy — who, like others in this article, were granted anonymity to speak candidly — also underscored deep concern about Michigan. Those people still believe that all the states are close and that there are alternative routes to victory.

[…]



But also potentially troubling for Democrats: What Harris’ campaign had thought was one of its best insurance possibilities may also be in peril. Just a few weeks ago, several Harris advisers in interviews pointed to the combination of electoral votes from North Carolina and Nevada as a strong alternative path for Harris should Trump win Pennsylvania and claim its 19 electoral votes.

While North Carolina is still in the campaign’s sights and Democrats maintain strong organization and leadership there, the Harris team is far less bullish about victory, four people with knowledge of the dynamics said.

“Of all of the seven [states], that one seems to be a little bit slipping away,” the Harris campaign official said of North Carolina.

[…]

Since Harris’ entry, the campaign has looked at the blue wall states as central to her election path, but it has also considered states like Nevada as essential in bulking up a win even if Democrats uphold the blue wall, in case legal challenges arise, according to three campaign officials.

In the remaining states of Nevada, Arizona and Georgia, the election remains close or Harris is down, according to public polling. Surveys have found Trump leading in Arizona and Georgia and Harris slightly up in Nevada.


BJ-

Swing states are lost to her-
Blue wall crumbling
Record turnouts in Republican Early Voting

President Trump could actually get more votes in total than Harris.
She is a slightly less likeable, and way less of a politician than Hilliary.
I bet he wins all the swing states. The ho is done.
 
Enough with the red mirage of 2022, which has become the Democrats’ favorite crutch amid a failing Kamala Harris campaign.

You cannot compare a midterm and presidential election cycle—it’s beyond absurd that some, especially pollsters, take this pivot seriously.

When Trump is on the ballot, the dynamics change. That’s undeniable, but I also understand it’s a coping mechanism.

Democrats thought Kamala would be crushing Donald Trump.

Now, two weeks from Election Day, she’s looking shaky along the Blue Wall, her campaign is bearish in North Carolina, and things are not shaping up too well in Nevada, where Republican early voting has reached levels never seen in the Reid Machine era.

And now, we have aides saying it’s a five-alarm fire in Michigan (via NBC News):

Recent discussions have centered on the possibility of an anomaly happening this year with just part of the blue wall breaking its way. The conversations have focused on whether Michigan or Wisconsin “fall” to former President Donald Trump while the two other states go blue, according to three sources with knowledge of the campaign’s strategy.

Losing Wisconsin or Michigan would mean that even if Harris secures Pennsylvania — where both Harris and Trump have spent the most time and resources — she would not reach the necessary 270 electoral votes to win the White House without winning another battleground state or possibly two.

“There has been a thought that maybe Michigan or Wisconsin will fall off,” said a senior Harris campaign official, who stressed that the bigger concern is over Michigan. Two other people with knowledge of campaign strategy — who, like others in this article, were granted anonymity to speak candidly — also underscored deep concern about Michigan. Those people still believe that all the states are close and that there are alternative routes to victory.

[…]



But also potentially troubling for Democrats: What Harris’ campaign had thought was one of its best insurance possibilities may also be in peril. Just a few weeks ago, several Harris advisers in interviews pointed to the combination of electoral votes from North Carolina and Nevada as a strong alternative path for Harris should Trump win Pennsylvania and claim its 19 electoral votes.

While North Carolina is still in the campaign’s sights and Democrats maintain strong organization and leadership there, the Harris team is far less bullish about victory, four people with knowledge of the dynamics said.

“Of all of the seven [states], that one seems to be a little bit slipping away,” the Harris campaign official said of North Carolina.

[…]

Since Harris’ entry, the campaign has looked at the blue wall states as central to her election path, but it has also considered states like Nevada as essential in bulking up a win even if Democrats uphold the blue wall, in case legal challenges arise, according to three campaign officials.

In the remaining states of Nevada, Arizona and Georgia, the election remains close or Harris is down, according to public polling. Surveys have found Trump leading in Arizona and Georgia and Harris slightly up in Nevada.


BJ-

Swing states are lost to her-
Blue wall crumbling
Record turnouts in Republican Early Voting

President Trump could actually get more votes in total than Harris.
She is a slightly less likeable, and way less of a politician than Hilliary.

Townhall.com is not a valid source. Your delusions that Trump will be re-elected are heart warming.
 
Dems say Trump is tired…but Kamala took yesterday off.

Weird.

Trump did not.

Where will Kamala kick everyone out of a restaurant in a swing state and bus in PAID KAMALA SUPPORTERS for a bullshit town hall next? Flint?
 
Wow, you guys are delusional.

Here's the thing. Early voting is at record levels.

The higher the turnout, the better it is for Democrats, always.

Most of the states release the breakout -
 
Campaigning with Liz Cheney is hurting her among the more liberal supporters.
 
Campaigning with Liz Cheney is hurting her among the more liberal supporters.

I doubt that is true.
Her most liberal supporters hate President Rump
Liz Cheney hates President Trump - for now that is enough.
 
I doubt that is true.
Her most liberal supporters hate President Rump
Liz Cheney hates President Trump - for now that is enough.
Associating with Republicans will only hurt her campaign and not help it. She should be campaigning with Democrats.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom