Social media has made boycotts something to be feared instead of mocked as they were only a few short years ago. Some twitter slams by a few celebrities can now cost companies millions in just a few days.
NBC and Macy's just promote Trump,& screw over pageant girls
- Thread starter dcraelin
- Start date
Sure he has the right to an opinion. What he ain't got is a right to a TV show.
Oddly enough, though he prolly doesn't know it, he also has the right to not be a petulant asshole who runs around suing everybody who doesn't fall on their knees and genuflect to his miserable apology for human protoplasm. He should exercise that right.
They have a morality clause. Rump providing them an opportunity to invoke it was only a matter of time. It's an easy out.
The bizarre part is trying to figure out why the **** they would have taken him on in the first place.
Oh poster please....
This just in: "pageant girls" don't have a right to a TV show either. If there's a way some genius can figure out to exploit them in some sort of softcore sex show, somebody will find it and so exploit them. They do still have the right to be exploited. It just doesn't need to be Donald T. Rump exploiting them.
And then he threatens to sue her...
That's spot-on accurate too. I can't for the life of me figure out why anybody gives this asshat the time of day. It's like some sort of hypnotic masochism.
dcraelin
VIP Member
- Sep 4, 2013
- 2,553
- 136
- 85
- Thread starter
- #26
Oh poster please....
This just in: "pageant girls" don't have a right to a TV show either. If there's a way some genius can figure out to exploit them in some sort of softcore sex show, somebody will find it and so exploit them. They do still have the right to be exploited. It just doesn't need to be Donald T. Rump exploiting them.
your sympathy is overwhelming.......
That sort of exploitation becomes more likely now that NBC is depriving them of the spotlight they entered thinking they might get.
They'd be giving him more publicity by going ahead with the broadcasts. At this point Rump's giving himself publicity with the old "I'll sue" song and dance --- a "suit" that will be laughed out of court in about ten minutes.
He pulls this stunt all the time. He actually sued Palm Beach County three times because he didn't like planes flying over his estate. He lost those too. He's a ******* tot.
Oh poster please....
This just in: "pageant girls" don't have a right to a TV show either. If there's a way some genius can figure out to exploit them in some sort of softcore sex show, somebody will find it and so exploit them. They do still have the right to be exploited. It just doesn't need to be Donald T. Rump exploiting them.
your sympathy is overwhelming.......
That sort of exploitation becomes more likely now that NBC is depriving them of the spotlight they entered thinking they might get.
There IS NO "deprivation". They don't have the right to a TV show. Neither does Rump.
dcraelin
VIP Member
- Sep 4, 2013
- 2,553
- 136
- 85
- Thread starter
- #29
Oh poster please....
This just in: "pageant girls" don't have a right to a TV show either. If there's a way some genius can figure out to exploit them in some sort of softcore sex show, somebody will find it and so exploit them. They do still have the right to be exploited. It just doesn't need to be Donald T. Rump exploiting them.
your sympathy is overwhelming.......
That sort of exploitation becomes more likely now that NBC is depriving them of the spotlight they entered thinking they might get.
There IS NO "deprivation". They don't have the right to a TV show. Neither does Rump.
Its still deprivation.......I said nothing about them having a right......I was talking about what was the right thing to do by them.
blackhawk
Diamond Member
Not really Trump had his Presidential announcement got his moment and was fading from view . Then he made his immigration comments got the reaction he knew he would and bam he's the top news story again. As soon as everyone starts to lose interest in him again he will do or say something outlandish again and everyone will fall for it again.
How is it right to shine the light of suspicion on millions of Hispanic men of being rapist because of their ethnicity? Maybe some are not considering the seriousness of Trumps words. He took his position of power and celebrity and abused it, showed horrible diplomacy skills and bore false witness against an entire ethnic population of males. Male US citizens whose ancestors were here for hundreds of years are now looked at as potential rapist because of this stupid mans comments. Mexican American veterans are being viewed as possible rapist thanks to this idiot. The pretty girls can go out and pursue their careers as models without any difficulty. They will miss a TV appearance. Big deal.
Oh poster please....
This just in: "pageant girls" don't have a right to a TV show either. If there's a way some genius can figure out to exploit them in some sort of softcore sex show, somebody will find it and so exploit them. They do still have the right to be exploited. It just doesn't need to be Donald T. Rump exploiting them.
your sympathy is overwhelming.......
That sort of exploitation becomes more likely now that NBC is depriving them of the spotlight they entered thinking they might get.
There IS NO "deprivation". They don't have the right to a TV show. Neither does Rump.
Its still deprivation.......I said nothing about them having a right......I was talking about what was the right thing to do by them.
B. Kidd
Diamond Member
Major Macy's Hypocrisy Alert:
Macy s Also Gets Slapped With Racial Discrimination Lawsuit By Black Shopper
Macy s Also Gets Slapped With Racial Discrimination Lawsuit By Black Shopper
Oh poster please....
This just in: "pageant girls" don't have a right to a TV show either. If there's a way some genius can figure out to exploit them in some sort of softcore sex show, somebody will find it and so exploit them. They do still have the right to be exploited. It just doesn't need to be Donald T. Rump exploiting them.
your sympathy is overwhelming.......
That sort of exploitation becomes more likely now that NBC is depriving them of the spotlight they entered thinking they might get.
There IS NO "deprivation". They don't have the right to a TV show. Neither does Rump.
Its still deprivation.......I said nothing about them having a right......I was talking about what was the right thing to do by them.
If you agree they don't have the right to a TV show, meaning the TV company has the right to choose to present what it wants --- then where exactly is this 'deprivation'??
Deprivation of ---- what?
dcraelin
VIP Member
- Sep 4, 2013
- 2,553
- 136
- 85
- Thread starter
- #34
How is it right to shine the light of suspicion on millions of Hispanic men of being rapist because of their ethnicity? Maybe some are not considering the seriousness of Trumps words. He took his position of power and celebrity and abused it, showed horrible diplomacy skills and bore false witness against an entire ethnic population of males. Male US citizens whose ancestors were here for hundreds of years are now looked at as potential rapist because of this stupid mans comments. Mexican American veterans are being viewed as possible rapist thanks to this idiot. The pretty girls can go out and pursue their careers as models without any difficulty. They will miss a TV appearance. Big deal.
Oh poster please....
This just in: "pageant girls" don't have a right to a TV show either. If there's a way some genius can figure out to exploit them in some sort of softcore sex show, somebody will find it and so exploit them. They do still have the right to be exploited. It just doesn't need to be Donald T. Rump exploiting them.
your sympathy is overwhelming.......
That sort of exploitation becomes more likely now that NBC is depriving them of the spotlight they entered thinking they might get.
There IS NO "deprivation". They don't have the right to a TV show. Neither does Rump.
Its still deprivation.......I said nothing about them having a right......I was talking about what was the right thing to do by them.
the statement was viewed as so over the top, no none took it all that seriously...except the idiots at NBC and Macy's.....well and you apparently....
dcraelin
VIP Member
- Sep 4, 2013
- 2,553
- 136
- 85
- Thread starter
- #35
Oh poster please....
This just in: "pageant girls" don't have a right to a TV show either. If there's a way some genius can figure out to exploit them in some sort of softcore sex show, somebody will find it and so exploit them. They do still have the right to be exploited. It just doesn't need to be Donald T. Rump exploiting them.
your sympathy is overwhelming.......
That sort of exploitation becomes more likely now that NBC is depriving them of the spotlight they entered thinking they might get.
There IS NO "deprivation". They don't have the right to a TV show. Neither does Rump.
Its still deprivation.......I said nothing about them having a right......I was talking about what was the right thing to do by them.
If you agree they don't have the right to a TV show, meaning the TV company has the right to choose to present what it wants --- then where exactly is this 'deprivation'??
Deprivation of ---- what?
deprivation of their chance in the spotlight. Are you really that daft? They went into this thing thinking they might have a night on that stage with millions watching through NBC............now not........
I hope every single one of them sue NBC for this..............because of its prissy little PC fit ...it has hurt their potential careers.
Oh poster please....
This just in: "pageant girls" don't have a right to a TV show either. If there's a way some genius can figure out to exploit them in some sort of softcore sex show, somebody will find it and so exploit them. They do still have the right to be exploited. It just doesn't need to be Donald T. Rump exploiting them.
your sympathy is overwhelming.......
That sort of exploitation becomes more likely now that NBC is depriving them of the spotlight they entered thinking they might get.
There IS NO "deprivation". They don't have the right to a TV show. Neither does Rump.
Its still deprivation.......I said nothing about them having a right......I was talking about what was the right thing to do by them.
If you agree they don't have the right to a TV show, meaning the TV company has the right to choose to present what it wants --- then where exactly is this 'deprivation'??
Deprivation of ---- what?
deprivation of their chance in the spotlight. Are you really that daft? They went into this thing thinking they might have a night on that stage with millions watching through NBC............now not........
I hope every single one of them sue NBC for this..............because of its prissy little PC fit ...it has hurt their potential careers.
But you just agreed they don't have the right to television exposure. How is one "deprived" of something they don't have the right to in the first place? You're saying NBC owes them a living now?
Having it both ways: Priceless!
So on what grounds could they "sue"? You're as bad as Rump with the suit-happy obsession.
NBC has a morality clause in their contracts. Everybody that's on one of their shows agrees to it. So they exercised it. Also known as "Wednesday".
kiwiman127
Comfortably Moderate
Edna's House of Wigs decided to join NBC and Macy's and will stop selling the trademarked "Donald Trump Comb Over Wig."
Edna Shipbiskey was quoted as saying "Donald Trump, you're fired" and then noted she is selling the "Gene Simmons Full Head of Hair Wig" at a discounted price, plus you get Kiss's newest CD thrown in the deal. She also noted, that since she made that change, her business picked up over 300% with the Hispanic customer base.
Edna Shipbiskey was quoted as saying "Donald Trump, you're fired" and then noted she is selling the "Gene Simmons Full Head of Hair Wig" at a discounted price, plus you get Kiss's newest CD thrown in the deal. She also noted, that since she made that change, her business picked up over 300% with the Hispanic customer base.
dcraelin
VIP Member
- Sep 4, 2013
- 2,553
- 136
- 85
- Thread starter
- #38
But you just agreed they don't have the right to television exposure. How is one "deprived" of something they don't have the right to in the first place? You're saying NBC owes them a living now?
Having it both ways: Priceless!
So on what grounds could they "sue"? You're as bad as Rump with the suit-happy obsession.
NBC has a morality clause in their contracts. Everybody that's on one of their shows agrees to it. So they exercised it. Also known as "Wednesday".
It doesnt have a ******* thing to do with "rights" asshole. It has to do with implied promises, & maybe contracts.
the word "deprived" is not automatically tied with "rights" except maybe in your puny little mind.
On top of your (hopefully) willful ignorance, you're also putting words in my mouth. "a living" ,...no....just what was originally scheduled, or similar substitute.
"morality clause"..........what is that, but an excuse? They dont like a word someone uses so they can skip out on an obligation because of it?......thats a hell of a "clause", this has nothing to do with "morality" and everything to do with their PC politics.
Last edited:
But you just agreed they don't have the right to television exposure. How is one "deprived" of something they don't have the right to in the first place? You're saying NBC owes them a living now?
Having it both ways: Priceless!
So on what grounds could they "sue"? You're as bad as Rump with the suit-happy obsession.
NBC has a morality clause in their contracts. Everybody that's on one of their shows agrees to it. So they exercised it. Also known as "Wednesday".
It doesnt have a ******* thing to do with "rights" asshole. It has to do with implied promises, & maybe contracts.
the word "deprived" is not automatically tied with "rights" except maybe in your puny little mind.
On top of your (hopefully) willful ignorance, you're also putting words in my mouth. "a living" ,...no....just what was originally scheduled, or similar substitute.
"morality clause"..........what is that, but an excuse for their prissy PC fit.
Sure does have to do with contracts, and morality clauses -- which have been used in TV, movies and sports franchises for close to 100 years.
Here's what it looks like --- and this is the actual NBC contract language:
‘“If artist commits any act or becomes involved in any situation, or occurrence, which brings artist into public disrepute, contempt, scandal or ridicule, or which justifiably shocks, insults or offends a significant portion of the community, or if publicity is given to any such conduct . . . company shall have the right to terminate.”’
This is the clause that let NBC take Brian Williams off the air and that other wacko cable channel to kick Phil Robertson off without breach of contract. Morals clauses go back to 1921.
Any more questions?
jknowgood
Diamond Member
Could say the same about Obama.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Trump Dealt Another Blow As Virginia Passes Redistricting Measure- Started by skews13
- Replies: 1
-
-
Iran's only hope is the Democratic Party and their traitorous Media.- Started by MarathonMike
- Replies: 4
-
Protestors Chant "Free The Dogs!" At Beagle Breeding Facility- Started by ChristisKing
- Replies: 8
-
WM Democrats, ever Wonder what B and F Democrats think of You? Also, who is the face of Democratic Masculinity?- Started by Seymour Flops
- Replies: 2
