Nazi Pelousy MUST send the Articles of Impeachment to Senate, or Trump wasn't impeached.

[Sunni Man]

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

NOT IMPEACHED until Psycho Pelosi sends shit to Senate.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

But an indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.

STILL NOT IMPEACHED!!!!




KHAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNN!!!!!

I cannot read your link as it is behind a pay wall, but the bit you posted seems most unlikely to be true. If a trial were needed then all the Senate would ever need to do is not ever hold the trial and poof...no impeachment.

Here's more:

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

NOT IMPEACHED until Psycho Pelosi sends shit to Senate.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

But an indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.

STILL NOT IMPEACHED!!!!




KHAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNN!!!!!

I cannot read your link as it is behind a pay wall, but the bit you posted seems most unlikely to be true. If a trial were needed then all the Senate would ever need to do is not ever hold the trial and poof...no impeachment.

Here's more:

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

.

Does your link give the part of the Constitution they are pulling this from?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Not yet. Lol.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

.

 

[LoneLaugher]

No Puppet
No Collusion
No Obstruction
No Quid Pro Quo
No Impeachment

Denial is awesome if you have a few million morons who want to bleeeev.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

No Puppet
No Collusion
No Obstruction
No Quid Pro Quo
No Impeachment

Denial is awesome if you have a few million morons who want to bleeeev.

Technically, he hasnt been impeached. Its probably a formality unless she never sends the articles over, then he never was formally impeached. Now, she can keep the vote as a memento and show her guests when they come over to visit her and giggle and stuff.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

NOT IMPEACHED until Psycho Pelosi sends shit to Senate.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

But an indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.

STILL NOT IMPEACHED!!!!




KHAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNN!!!!!

I cannot read your link as it is behind a pay wall, but the bit you posted seems most unlikely to be true. If a trial were needed then all the Senate would ever need to do is not ever hold the trial and poof...no impeachment.

Here's more:

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

.

Does your link give the part of the Constitution they are pulling this from?

The relevant constitutional provisions are brief. Article I gives the House “the sole power of impeachment.” And it gives the Senate “the sole power to try all impeachments.” Article II says that the president “shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Putting these three different provisions together yields the conclusion that the only way to remove the president while he is in office is if the House impeaches him and the Senate tries and convicts him.

The provisions say nothing about timing. Taken literally, they don’t directly say that articles of impeachment passed by the House must be sent to the Senate. But the framers’ definition of impeachment assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote.

The framers drafted the constitutional provisions against the backdrop of impeachment as it had been practiced in England, where the House of Commons impeached and the House of Lords tried the impeachments. The whole point of impeachment by the Commons was for the charges of impeachment to be brought against the accused in the House of Lords.

.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

NOT IMPEACHED until Psycho Pelosi sends shit to Senate.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

But an indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.

STILL NOT IMPEACHED!!!!




KHAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNN!!!!!

I cannot read your link as it is behind a pay wall, but the bit you posted seems most unlikely to be true. If a trial were needed then all the Senate would ever need to do is not ever hold the trial and poof...no impeachment.

Here's more:

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

.

Does your link give the part of the Constitution they are pulling this from?

The relevant constitutional provisions are brief. Article I gives the House “the sole power of impeachment.” And it gives the Senate “the sole power to try all impeachments.” Article II says that the president “shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Putting these three different provisions together yields the conclusion that the only way to remove the president while he is in office is if the House impeaches him and the Senate tries and convicts him.

The provisions say nothing about timing. Taken literally, they don’t directly say that articles of impeachment passed by the House must be sent to the Senate. But the framers’ definition of impeachment assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote.

The framers drafted the constitutional provisions against the backdrop of impeachment as it had been practiced in England, where the House of Commons impeached and the House of Lords tried the impeachments. The whole point of impeachment by the Commons was for the charges of impeachment to be brought against the accused in the House of Lords.

.

So, after all this it is just this dude's interpretation of the Constitution.

Thanks!

What an easy out for Trump and the GOP....just refuse to hold a trail and BOOM...the impeachment is not real.

I cannot wait for them to announce that is their plan!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If the House votes to “impeach” but doesn’t send the articles to the Senate or send impeachment managers there to carry its message, it hasn’t directly violated the text of the Constitution. But the House would be acting against the implicit logic of the Constitution’s description of impeachment.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

NOT IMPEACHED until Psycho Pelosi sends shit to Senate.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?



STILL NOT IMPEACHED!!!!




KHAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNN!!!!!

I cannot read your link as it is behind a pay wall, but the bit you posted seems most unlikely to be true. If a trial were needed then all the Senate would ever need to do is not ever hold the trial and poof...no impeachment.

Here's more:

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

.

Does your link give the part of the Constitution they are pulling this from?

The relevant constitutional provisions are brief. Article I gives the House “the sole power of impeachment.” And it gives the Senate “the sole power to try all impeachments.” Article II says that the president “shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Putting these three different provisions together yields the conclusion that the only way to remove the president while he is in office is if the House impeaches him and the Senate tries and convicts him.

The provisions say nothing about timing. Taken literally, they don’t directly say that articles of impeachment passed by the House must be sent to the Senate. But the framers’ definition of impeachment assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote.

The framers drafted the constitutional provisions against the backdrop of impeachment as it had been practiced in England, where the House of Commons impeached and the House of Lords tried the impeachments. The whole point of impeachment by the Commons was for the charges of impeachment to be brought against the accused in the House of Lords.

.

So, after all this it is just this dude's interpretation of the Constitution.

Thanks!

What an easy out for Trump and the GOP....just refuse to hold a trail and BOOM...the impeachment is not real.

I cannot wait for them to announce that is their plan!

It's an even easier out just to not send impeachment articles over to the Senate.

This is all ******* window dressing. And the window dressing isn't even window dressing anymore Ha ha ha!

By the way this is the opinion of a Harvard law professor.


I know some people masturbate to the thought of him being impeached, but it ain't happened yet.

Bluff called.


.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If the House votes to “impeach” but doesn’t send the articles to the Senate or send impeachment managers there to carry its message, it hasn’t directly violated the text of the Constitution. But the House would be acting against the implicit logic of the Constitution’s description of impeachment.

.

You are trying too hard here little buddy!

It is done and over and was all just for show...let it go, it will not impact your day in the least either way.

Look at all the bills that were passed while this was going on...while everyone was fascinated with the shiny object.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I cannot read your link as it is behind a pay wall, but the bit you posted seems most unlikely to be true. If a trial were needed then all the Senate would ever need to do is not ever hold the trial and poof...no impeachment.

Here's more:

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

.

Does your link give the part of the Constitution they are pulling this from?

The relevant constitutional provisions are brief. Article I gives the House “the sole power of impeachment.” And it gives the Senate “the sole power to try all impeachments.” Article II says that the president “shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Putting these three different provisions together yields the conclusion that the only way to remove the president while he is in office is if the House impeaches him and the Senate tries and convicts him.

The provisions say nothing about timing. Taken literally, they don’t directly say that articles of impeachment passed by the House must be sent to the Senate. But the framers’ definition of impeachment assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote.

The framers drafted the constitutional provisions against the backdrop of impeachment as it had been practiced in England, where the House of Commons impeached and the House of Lords tried the impeachments. The whole point of impeachment by the Commons was for the charges of impeachment to be brought against the accused in the House of Lords.

.

So, after all this it is just this dude's interpretation of the Constitution.

Thanks!

What an easy out for Trump and the GOP....just refuse to hold a trail and BOOM...the impeachment is not real.

I cannot wait for them to announce that is their plan!

It's an even easier out just to not send impeachment articles over to the Senate.

This is all ******* window dressing. And the window dressing isn't even window dressing anymore Ha ha ha!

By the way this is the opinion of a Harvard law professor.


I know some people masturbate to the thought of him being impeached, but it ain't happened yet.

Bluff called.


.

He is impeached, he will go down in history as the 3rd president to be so. Nothing can change that, not all the wishful thinking in the world.

I did not realize you were such a devoted follower.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If the House votes to “impeach” but doesn’t send the articles to the Senate or send impeachment managers there to carry its message, it hasn’t directly violated the text of the Constitution. But the House would be acting against the implicit logic of the Constitution’s description of impeachment.

.

You are trying too hard here little buddy!

It is done and over and was all just for show...let it go, it will not impact your day in the least either way.

Look at all the bills that were passed while this was going on...while everyone was fascinated with the shiny object.

Exactly.

Nice distraction by the duopoly while they consistently **** us up the ass.

The dopes who wanted all of the shit to happen to allowed it to get pushed through while these motherfuckers hid all the other bullshit from us.

We have too many motherfucking idiots in this country that need to be executed for stupidity.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Here's more:

.

Does your link give the part of the Constitution they are pulling this from?

The relevant constitutional provisions are brief. Article I gives the House “the sole power of impeachment.” And it gives the Senate “the sole power to try all impeachments.” Article II says that the president “shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Putting these three different provisions together yields the conclusion that the only way to remove the president while he is in office is if the House impeaches him and the Senate tries and convicts him.

The provisions say nothing about timing. Taken literally, they don’t directly say that articles of impeachment passed by the House must be sent to the Senate. But the framers’ definition of impeachment assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote.

The framers drafted the constitutional provisions against the backdrop of impeachment as it had been practiced in England, where the House of Commons impeached and the House of Lords tried the impeachments. The whole point of impeachment by the Commons was for the charges of impeachment to be brought against the accused in the House of Lords.

.

So, after all this it is just this dude's interpretation of the Constitution.

Thanks!

What an easy out for Trump and the GOP....just refuse to hold a trail and BOOM...the impeachment is not real.

I cannot wait for them to announce that is their plan!

It's an even easier out just to not send impeachment articles over to the Senate.

This is all ******* window dressing. And the window dressing isn't even window dressing anymore Ha ha ha!

By the way this is the opinion of a Harvard law professor.


I know some people masturbate to the thought of him being impeached, but it ain't happened yet.

Bluff called.


.

He is impeached, he will go down in history as the 3rd president to be so. Nothing can change that, not all the wishful thinking in the world.

I did not realize you were such a devoted follower.

Just laughing at all of the manipulatable tools (like you apparently) wanting nothing more than to get that impeachment label attached to this guy because they hate him so much. All the while these lawmakers **** us up the ass with bullshit none of us would really want. And they only did it because we were distracted by the circus.

.

 

[IM2]

NOT IMPEACHED until Psycho Pelosi sends shit to Senate.

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

But an indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.

STILL NOT IMPEACHED!!!!

KHAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNN!!!!!

trump was impeached on Wednesday.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Does your link give the part of the Constitution they are pulling this from?

The relevant constitutional provisions are brief. Article I gives the House “the sole power of impeachment.” And it gives the Senate “the sole power to try all impeachments.” Article II says that the president “shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Putting these three different provisions together yields the conclusion that the only way to remove the president while he is in office is if the House impeaches him and the Senate tries and convicts him.

The provisions say nothing about timing. Taken literally, they don’t directly say that articles of impeachment passed by the House must be sent to the Senate. But the framers’ definition of impeachment assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote.

The framers drafted the constitutional provisions against the backdrop of impeachment as it had been practiced in England, where the House of Commons impeached and the House of Lords tried the impeachments. The whole point of impeachment by the Commons was for the charges of impeachment to be brought against the accused in the House of Lords.

.

So, after all this it is just this dude's interpretation of the Constitution.

Thanks!

What an easy out for Trump and the GOP....just refuse to hold a trail and BOOM...the impeachment is not real.

I cannot wait for them to announce that is their plan!

It's an even easier out just to not send impeachment articles over to the Senate.

This is all ******* window dressing. And the window dressing isn't even window dressing anymore Ha ha ha!

By the way this is the opinion of a Harvard law professor.


I know some people masturbate to the thought of him being impeached, but it ain't happened yet.

Bluff called.


.

He is impeached, he will go down in history as the 3rd president to be so. Nothing can change that, not all the wishful thinking in the world.

I did not realize you were such a devoted follower.

Just laughing at all of the manipulatable tools (like you apparently) wanting nothing more than to get that impeachment label attached to this guy because they hate him so much. All the while these lawmakers **** us up the ass with bullshit none of us would really want. And they only did it because we were distracted by the circus.

.

They're giddy and cheering. They can't contain their ecstasy.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Just laughing at all of the manipulatable tools (like you apparently) wanting nothing more than to get that impeachment label attached to this guy because they hate him so much. All the while these lawmakers **** us up the ass with bullshit none of us would really want. And they only did it because we were distracted by the circus.

.

Does not matter to me at all, as I said it has no impact on my day. But it is there, all the wishful thinking in the world will not remove it. You whine about being distracted by the circus...and then make threads joining the circus.

 

[IM2]

Liberals are blowing their load prematurely. Idiots think they have this fantasy all wrapped up.

In actuality, they now are flaccid, feel a little dirty, and have a sticky mess on their hands.

Trump is still your president and will probably win 2020 as the Dems really have no contender.

Biden will destroy trump. Right now trump can talk shit unopposed but he has challengers in his own party that aren't being allowed to primary. But when he actually has an opponent carving up his record and talking about his impeachment, all this trump is unbeatable delusion will end.

 

[MAGAman]

How did the vote fail?

That's easy.

Who's the President?