Nature magazine yanks global-warming study

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Messages
47,737
Reaction score
12,874
Points
2,210
Scientist Nic Lewis, who pointed out the errors shortly after the study was published, said it was "just the latest example of climate scientists letting themselves down by using incorrect statistics."

Oops! Nature magazine yanks global-warming study for 'systematic errors' - WND

Nature is a British multidisciplinary scientific journal, first published on 4 November 1869. It is one of the most recognizable scientific journals in the world, and was ranked the world's most cited scientific journal by the Science Edition of the 2010 Journal Citation Reports and is ascribed an impact factor of 43.070, making it one of the world's top academic journals. It is one of the few remaining academic journals that publishes original research across a wide range of scientific fields.
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
That was the study that induced the hysterical handwaving over the oceans supposedly warming much faster than we thought.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
112,722
Reaction score
23,926
Points
2,220
Location
Location, location
The study of Climate Science has few real scientists and a boatload of cheerleaders.

CO2 Rah rah rah!
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
All hail the great and terrible CO2 molecule....
 

bear513

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2012
Messages
59,810
Reaction score
8,638
Points
2,030
The study of Climate Science has few real scientists and a boatload of cheerleaders.

CO2 Rah rah rah!

That and old rocks, mammoth, CNM all used snow blower and snow mobile salesmen.
 

Sunsettommy

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
5,208
Reaction score
2,557
Points
385
So, the science corrects itself.

So much for denier conspiracy kookery.
Your stupidity keeps growing and growing...., it was a "denier" who exposed the screamingly obvious errors of the paper, that manage to sail through.... he he... ha ha.... peer review unfettered. It took a "denier" to find the errors that warmists failed to notice, they were obvious errors they has manage to miss, too much koolaid?

You don't even know who Nicholas Lewis is.
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
So, the science corrects itself.

So much for denier conspiracy kookery.
Your stupidity keeps growing and growing...., it was a "denier" who exposed the screamingly obvious errors of the paper, that manage to sail through.... he he... ha ha.... peer review unfettered. It took a "denier" to find the errors that warmists failed to notice, they were obvious errors they has manage to miss, too much koolaid?

You don't even know who Nicholas Lewis is.
I also noted that the retraction was not nearly as loud as the "warming faster than we though: hysterics that the media and climate sceince itself spewed over the paper's release...
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
Chalk up yet one more alarmist pseudoscientific steaming pile of excrement being retracted...

But watch them continue to claim that the oceans are "warming faster than we ever thought."

Even after the pseudoscience is relegated to the dustbin of history, the claimed based on it continue on....a prime example of zombie science..a prime example of the entirety of the CAGW claims..
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top