1srelluc
Diamond Member
MSN
www.msn.com
Patricia Marroquin Norby, Metropolitan Museum of Art's first Native American curator, has been accused of lying about her roots. According to New York Post, campaigners are raising questions, saying the 53-year-old does not belong to a federally recognized tribe in the US.
Native American groups told The New York Post that her Native American roots are 'made up'.
"She is definitely not Native American," the media outlet quoted a critic as saying. Kathy Griffin, a member of the Cherokee Nation who compiled a genealogy of Marroquin Norby’s family, told the Post: “With all of the Native American scholars out there, we really wonder why the museum chose Patricia, who is definitely not Native American.”
The Met has weighed in on the row, insisting that she is telling the truth because she is a descendent of the 'Pureapacha peoples'. But the tribe, rooted in Mexico and parts of Texas, is not among the 574 officially recognized as being Native American.
Norby took to social media this week to slam the allegations against her, claiming she is being targeted by a group of Native American women trying to 'cancel' her.
She denied the questioning of her roots, and said she is proud of her 'Purepacha and Nde family roots from Mexico, northern Mexico and Texas.'......'I am not going to hide my identity or family history in shame,' she added.

Note how it's other native americans ripping her apart. Injun crab mentality is hilarious, you'd think after getting their asses kicked by the white devil they'd wise up and realize how this cultural problem of theirs helped to destroy them.
This doesn't appear to rise to anywhere near the Elizabeth Warren level of deception.
I mean to me she looks a lot more NA than Rachel Dolezal looks black.
One of my favorite "NAs" was Italian and likely did more for the country than real NAs of era.