National parks refusing cash payment from visitors, demand cashless payment

johnwk

Platinum Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
5,099
Reaction score
2,752
Points
930
.
See: NPS Just Set "Unconstitutional, Discriminatory" New Ban Rule On Visitors At Another National Park

“The bone of contention? A slowly creeping ban on cash as payment to enter sites managed by the NPS, and plenty of people are very unhappy about it.”
Before proceeding, keep in mind, we are talking about access to taxpayer financed publicly-owned property, and not private property such as a privately owned theme park.

Our United States Code, § 5103, defines U.S. coins and currency as legal tender for all debts. For government employees to arbitrarily not accept legal tender, as defined by statutory law for payment to enter upon taxpayer owned public property is obviously in conflict with the above statute mentioned.

But even more disturbing with this arbitrary ban on legal tender as payment for entering a publicly owned park is, it blatantly discriminates against identifiable groups, e.g., the poor who may have the cash to pay to enjoy a day at a publicly owned park, but not have credit cards or bank accounts necessary for cashless payments, which in turn creates a disparate impact claim under anti-discrimination laws.

Additionally, there are other identifiable groups who are thoughtlessly discriminated against by cashless payment entry at publicly own parks. A good portion of our elderly citizens who are not tech savvy, and those withou8t electronic devices for cashless payment methods. They too are being unlawfully discriminated against and denied access to publicly owned property.

So why have some taxpayer employed public servants decided to discriminate against taxpaying citizens, who want or need to use “legal tender” to enter a publicly owned park?

These public servants tell us, "By transitioning to a cashless system, park staff will spend less time managing cash and more time helping visitors."

But nowhere in our Constitution (our nation’s rule book) are government employees allowed to discriminate against its citizens because “park staff will spend less time managing cash and more time helping visitors.”

Nowhere in our Constitution are government employees authorized to refuse statutorily defined “legal tender” as payment by American citizens to enter upon and enjoy public property.

This practice by public employees, which blatantly discriminates against identifiable groups of American citizens, needs to come to an abrupt end, and accommodations for legal tender payment needs to be restored for those wanting or needing to use legal tender, as statutorily define, for payment to enjoy publicly owned and taxpayer supported, parks.
 
.
See: NPS Just Set "Unconstitutional, Discriminatory" New Ban Rule On Visitors At Another National Park


Before proceeding, keep in mind, we are talking about access to taxpayer financed publicly-owned property, and not private property such as a privately owned theme park.

Our United States Code, § 5103, defines U.S. coins and currency as legal tender for all debts. For government employees to arbitrarily not accept legal tender, as defined by statutory law for payment to enter upon taxpayer owned public property is obviously in conflict with the above statute mentioned.

But even more disturbing with this arbitrary ban on legal tender as payment for entering a publicly owned park is, it blatantly discriminates against identifiable groups, e.g., the poor who may have the cash to pay to enjoy a day at a publicly owned park, but not have credit cards or bank accounts necessary for cashless payments, which in turn creates a disparate impact claim under anti-discrimination laws.

Additionally, there are other identifiable groups who are thoughtlessly discriminated against by cashless payment entry at publicly own parks. A good portion of our elderly citizens who are not tech savvy, and those withou8t electronic devices for cashless payment methods. They too are being unlawfully discriminated against and denied access to publicly owned property.

So why have some taxpayer employed public servants decided to discriminate against taxpaying citizens, who want or need to use “legal tender” to enter a publicly owned park?

These public servants tell us, "By transitioning to a cashless system, park staff will spend less time managing cash and more time helping visitors."

But nowhere in our Constitution (our nation’s rule book) are government employees allowed to discriminate against its citizens because “park staff will spend less time managing cash and more time helping visitors.”

Nowhere in our Constitution are government employees authorized to refuse statutorily defined “legal tender” as payment by American citizens to enter upon and enjoy public property.

This practice by public employees, which blatantly discriminates against identifiable groups of American citizens, needs to come to an abrupt end, and accommodations for legal tender payment needs to be restored for those wanting or needing to use legal tender, as statutorily define, for payment to enjoy publicly owned and taxpayer supported, parks.
It would be absolutely absurd to proceed on any such proposal.
 
Wow, how busy do such places even get anyway?

God bless you always!!!

Holly
This same cashless payment crap is now used at Tampa Bay area beach public-parking lots, e.g., see:

How to Pay for Parking


Seems that these local government folks believe they can ignore our system's rule of law, and do what they please, including discriminating against various groups of American citizens and refusing to allow them to enjoy public property if they decide to, or need to, use "legal tender" as payment.
 
A bunch of places worried about robbers won't take cash anymore.
 
I ran into that locally at a Hang Ten car wash....****-'em, I just went to the other one that takes cash.

Handing your card over at a car wash is about like handing it over at a Felons-R-Us scrap yard.

What could go wrong. 😐

And yeah, they don't take cash at the Shenandoah National Park either....The Northern Entrance is in my town....$30.00 to get in now.
 
I ran into that locally at a Hang Ten car wash....****-'em, I just went to the other one that takes cash.

Handing your card over at a car wash is about like handing it over at a Felons-R-Us scrap yard.

What could go wrong. 😐

I agree with you when private businesses refuse to accept cash. But when government folks, who are our employees, tell us to take it on the hop if want to pay cash, that's an entirely different thing, and they need to be punished for pulling that crap.
 
I agree with you when private businesses refuse to accept cash. But when government folks, who are our employees, tell us to take it on the hop if want to pay cash, that's an entirely different thing, and they need to be punished for pulling that crap.
LOL....I bet if Trump decided that they were gonna take cash and issued them the marching orders the dems would be up in arms about it.
 
I agree with you when private businesses refuse to accept cash. But when government folks, who are our employees, tell us to take it on the hop if want to pay cash, that's an entirely different thing, and they need to be punished for pulling that crap.
I absolutely agree, sir. However, a lot of these government agencies do things like this, because they know that it would take too much for an ordinary citizen to do enough to change anything. So they do what they like, knowing that there won't be any consequences.
 
I absolutely agree, sir. However, a lot of these government agencies do things like this, because they know that it would take too much for an ordinary citizen to do enough to change anything. So they do what they like, knowing that there won't be any consequences.
.
See: Frustrated visitor won't stop suing national parks over cashless rule

Her attorney, Ray Flores, needs to include how the policy creates a disparate impact and discriminates against various identifiable groups.
 
^^^ I wonder if so many people could have anything to do with there being a TV show by the same name.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
Historically, Yellowstone has been one of the more popular parks. I think the TV show is more of a political statement on the real problems of that pristine area. Like many other places of natural beauty, people want to own a piece of it and in so doing, they ruin what it was they were looking for when they bought it.
 

Madeira Beach government shuts out elderly by demanding cashless payment for parking​



I was talking to an elderly widowed lady a couple of years back who used to enjoy going to Madeira Beach early in the morning. It was her big event several times a week, and she really looked forward to going. But since the thoughtless government folks went to a cashless payment system, and took away the coin operated option for parking, she now sits at home because she can’t deal with the modern tech, and like many others, has been shut out of enjoying a taxpayer funded public beach.:mad:
 
15th post
I was just on vacation where the beach town I was in only took payment for parking by mobile app. I had to download the app, etc. All I was thinking was there is a segment of the older population that would never figure this out.
 
Back
Top Bottom