Based on historical context. Given below, what other logical conclusion can one draw?
Thank you for admitting this is your OPINION.
3 people violate the same rule, 2 are black, 1 is white, and only the blacks get expelled. How is that not racist?
You keep repeating the 'big picture' and leaving out the spe ific details and facts of how this came about, which have already been covered ... and ignored by you and GG because you are hellbent on declaring this to be 'racist'.
Perhaps if Democrats had not for decades and still do declare EVERYTHING and EVERYONE 'racist' maybe more peoe would believe you more often.
Instead it is an extremely used term, extremely overused tactic byDemocrats to silence and intimidate orhers into ceding an argument for fear of being branded a 'racist'.
Its a divisive socialist tool, as spelled out by Socialist Saul Alensky in his book 'Rules for Radicals' ... which Obama actually quoted from during his Innauguration speech.
The term 'racist' has been SO overused by Democrats thst many people simply ignore it now. This is one of tbe readons Democrats began using 'White Supremacist' more and 'racist' less.
I always found it humorous that the original founding party of the KKK, who lied to blacks for decades just to keep them voting Democrat, whose leaders are old,white, millionaire, elitist racists who call others 'racist'.
Joe Biden is a FLAMING racist - his own VP torched him on-stage in front of the world during the debates for it with her, 'I was that little girl' comment.
Ever since then Biden can't help letting the truth come out with humiliating racist statements - 'You aren't black unless you vote for me'. Of course the 1st lady can't help but be the racist she is by letting loose with her own racist comments now and then.
Of course Democrats still continue to call intelligent, indeprndent-thinking, successful conservative blacks 'Uncle Toms'.
I can only tell you what the legislator who cast deciding vote that allowed the white Rep not to be expelled said - GE said the reason he boted the way he did was NOT based on race but based on a valid legal point her lawyer made about her not being an active / leading participant in the obstructing of legislative session.
You choose to read that (or ignote it), call him a liar, and declare it was 'racism'.
You have offered no evidence to prove he lied, to prove his action was based on 'racism'.
You have offered your OPINION.
AGAIN, Democrats claim just about everything is 'racist' these days, as it appears you are doing.
www.wsmv.com
