What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

My Proposed Amendment To The US Constitution

Winston

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
3,753
Reaction score
1,688
Points
210
Location
North Carolina
We are saddled with a large number of incompetent and corrupt Federal judges who don't enforce the Constitution they way they vowed to do. I want all District Federal Judges to have their appointments and behavior reviewed every 10 years by a Senate Committee and the bad ones removed from the bench.
Great, just throw the separation of powers concept out the damn window. I mean hell, why even bother with a democracy or representative government. Monarchy worked so damn well in the past, why did we ever abandon it.
 

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
77,938
Reaction score
29,245
Points
2,250
READ it. Not use your own interpretations. People can "read" the general welfare clause, ignore everything else, and think that means its constitutional for the fed gov to do whatever they want. Of course, when you actually READ the Constitution, you know that isnt the case.
 

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
77,938
Reaction score
29,245
Points
2,250
Great, just throw the separation of powers concept out the damn window. I mean hell, why even bother with a democracy or representative government. Monarchy worked so damn well in the past, why did we ever abandon it.
Awww dumbass doesnt know what a monarchy is.
 

Ringtone

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
3,893
Reaction score
1,655
Points
210
We are saddled with a large number of incompetent and corrupt Federal judges who don't enforce the Constitution they way they vowed to do. I want all District Federal Judges to have their appointments and behavior reviewed every 10 years by a Senate Committee and the bad ones removed from the bench.
The only hope for this country is universal school choice. Divorced from the sociopolitical philosophy of America's founding, namely, Lockean natural law, the Constitution can be subverted to mean virtually anything.
 

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
79,009
Reaction score
54,249
Points
2,615
Location
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
235,317
Reaction score
59,525
Points
2,190
It always applied to countries, you lying sack of shit.
At first, Trump proposed a Muslim travel ban

He was slapped down and had to revise his policy to only apply to his “shithole countries” and not his good friends the Saudis
 

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
77,938
Reaction score
29,245
Points
2,250

Prof.Lunaphiles

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
2,648
Reaction score
1,767
Points
938
Location
Transient
You never read #51
But it is not possible to give to each department an equal power of self-defense. In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates. The remedy for this inconveniency is to divide the legislature into different branches; and to render them, by different modes of election and different principles of action, as little connected with each other as the nature of their common functions and their common dependence on the society will admit. It may even be necessary to guard against dangerous encroachments by still further precautions. As the weight of the legislative authority requires that it should be thus divided, the weakness of the executive may require, on the other hand, that it should be fortified. An absolute negative on the legislature appears, at first view, to be the natural defense with which the executive magistrate should be armed. But perhaps it would be neither altogether safe nor alone sufficient. On ordinary occasions it might not be exerted with the requisite firmness, and on extraordinary occasions it might be perfidiously abused. May not this defect of an absolute negative be supplied by some qualified connection between this weaker department and the weaker branch of the stronger department, by which the latter may be led to support the constitutional rights of the former, without being too much detached from the rights of its own depar, and we are tment?
They did not know how to construct further precautions, and we are enduring the adverse effects, thereof, and further adversely effected by the 17 Amendment and limited seats in the House.
 
Last edited:

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
235,317
Reaction score
59,525
Points
2,190
Hey genius, how is having elected representatives overlooking judges rulings a monarchy, you retarded dumbfuck?
Elected representatives create the laws, the Executive Branch enforces them and the courts interpret them
 

Prof.Lunaphiles

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
2,648
Reaction score
1,767
Points
938
Location
Transient
You think that they're going to follow the "new and improved" constitution any better than they've followed the current one?

You really are a special kind of stupid

You are not comprehending the fact that the checks and balances do not work, because of the inadequate deployment of the separation of entities.
A better separation of entities will provide the better checks and balances.

US4CC.meme.AOC_JH - Checks_Balances.png
 

Prof.Lunaphiles

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
2,648
Reaction score
1,767
Points
938
Location
Transient
Elected representatives create the laws, the Executive Branch enforces them and the courts interpret them
And that is all the three-part separation theory defines. It does not describe a bicameral legislature. It does not define the two hundred executive security agencies. And it does not define the hierarchy court system. Which have all been "discovered" over the past two hundred and forty years. And that does not mean that they put the jigsaw puzzle together correctly. It was all ad hoc adjustments for the necessity at the time. It is all jumbled up.
US4CC.meme.Lord_of_the_Rings - independent_investigation.png
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
235,317
Reaction score
59,525
Points
2,190
And that is all the three-part separation theory defines. It does not describe a bicameral legislature. It does not define the two hundred executive security agencies. And it does not define the hierarchy court system. Which have all been "discovered" over the past two hundred and forty years. And that does not mean that they put the jigsaw puzzle together correctly. It was all ad hoc adjustments for the necessity at the time. It is all jumbled up.
View attachment 570906

Been working for 240 years
I will take it
 

Prof.Lunaphiles

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
2,648
Reaction score
1,767
Points
938
Location
Transient
READ it. Not use your own interpretations. People can "read" the general welfare clause, ignore everything else, and think that means its constitutional for the fed gov to do whatever they want. Of course, when you actually READ the Constitution, you know that isnt the case.
Nope. That just means that the people do not agree to the terms.
What about the "domestic tranquility" clause - what does that mean, anything???

US4CC.meme.Al_Pacino - Out_of_Order.png
 
Last edited:

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
77,938
Reaction score
29,245
Points
2,250
Elected representatives create the laws, the Executive Branch enforces them and the courts interpret them
And AGAIN, my question isnt answered.
 

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
77,938
Reaction score
29,245
Points
2,250
Nope. That just means that the people do not agree to the terms.
What about the "domestic tranquility" clause - what does that mean, anything???

View attachment 570907
Its basic English. There is nothing to agree to.
Its not the Constitutions fault, we the people, allowed the fed gov to pervert it.
Do you mean the preamble? Yeah, that means nothing, legally.
 

Prof.Lunaphiles

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
2,648
Reaction score
1,767
Points
938
Location
Transient
Its basic English. There is nothing to agree to.
Its not the Constitutions fault, we the people, allowed the fed gov to pervert it.
Do you mean the preamble? Yeah, that means nothing, legally.
The Preamble is a six-categories diagnostic tool for evaluating the government. It is law - the Preamble is of sovereignty law. The Preamble is the description of the sovereignty of the United States. The Preamble is Our solemn greeting to the rest of the world. The Preamble is the essence and identity of the United States of America and cannot be separated.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top