Muslims riot in New York.

[Churchill]

Well considering the Hamas, Hezballah, Muslim Brotherhoods Charters are to kill every Jew in Israel id say she is right.

Even if your claims above were credible that doesn't prove that Lisa knows what antisemitisim is or that every accusations she makes is warranted.

Now you go back to playing Kill the Jew Mr RaggyHead

I'll go back to rational discourse, something you're unaquainted with.

 

[rosends]

yes.

and when we say that a word could be "misapplied" (and I just want to make sure I get this right) would we mean "without or without intent, contrary to a standardized and accepted definition" and would it be fair to conclude that using the word as it is defined to mean is the preferred course of action?

 

[eagle1462010]

Even if your claims above were credible that doesn't prove that Lisa knows what antisemitisim is or that every accusations she makes is warranted.

I'll go back to rational discourse, something you're unaquainted with.

Discourse with you is like talking to a tree. Worth just as much

 

[Churchill]

Completely the opposite. Only a raging antisemite like you

Do you agree that if we are to have a law defining antisemitism so that antisemites can be prosecuted, we should also have law to prosecute those who malicioulsy accuse others of making antisemtic statements?

In other words unhinged big mouths like you could be held accountable for such defamatory remarks. You accuse people of antisemitism based in your own deeply held prejudices and biases, in fact the mere act of disagreeing with you, routinely leads to such accusations.

would be outraged by a non-existent “genocide” because it can be falsely blamed on Jews, and ignore the actual genocide being committed by Muslims.

If it were Jews committing the genocide then by defintion it would be Jews who get blamed.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

You're to stupid to debate me, all you do is call me names.

You’re lucky to get off with that.

 

[eagle1462010]

Do you agree that if we are to have a law defining antisemitism so that antisemites can be prosecuted, we should also have law to prosecute those who malicioulsy accuse others of making antisemtic statements?

Wed have Europe. Europe is toast.

Now if this happens in Iran about Islam they would just Murder you.

 

[Churchill]

and when we say that a word could be "misapplied" (and I just want to make sure I get this right) would we mean "without or without intent, contrary to a standardized and accepted definition"

Well you originally used the phrase "used incorrectly" I informally used "misapplied" I'm happy to retract that and we can stick with "used incorrectly".

Your defintion is fine though providing we also define "standardized" and "accepted".

and would it be fair to conclude that using the word as it is defined to mean is the preferred course of action?

Depends on what "preference" means here. Are you asking about the rules of grammar, whether a remark is valid or wether it is sound?

 

[Churchill]

Discourse with you is like talking to a tree. Worth just as much

Nobody forces you to speak with me.

 

[Churchill]

You’re lucky to get off with that.

Shouldn't you be back in English class by this time? When will you be learning how to write sentences that contain more than eight words?

 

[rosends]

under the law there are protected groups. These groups have, in different circumstances, a protected status (here is the AI summary, "groups legally shielded from discrimination and harassment in employment, housing, and public accommodation under federal and state laws, primarily based on characteristics like race, sex, religion, national origin, age (40+), disability, and genetic information")

Now in order to apply this law, each group has to define what it finds to be harassment etc. In any case it is measured against a standard so here is one which uses the word "antisemitism" instead of "harassment based on religion"

“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

if one were to go back into that and replace "Antisemitism" with "Anti-homosexuality" and every "Jew" and "Jewish" with "Gay/s" and "homosexual" would anyone find a problem with adopting this?

what if it was anti-Buddhism? Would it bother anyone to have the definition on the books?

“Anti-X is a certain perception of X, which may be expressed as hatred toward X. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of Anti-X are directed toward X or non-X individuals and/or their property, toward X community institutions and religious facilities.”

What is inherently wrong with the generic template that makes its use problematic? Or is it that is being used by one group and/or not others?

 

[rosends]

Your defintion is fine though providing we also define "standardized" and "accepted".

Great. I think they would be based in an external codification by a communally (if not locally) agreed upon authority.

Depends on what "preference" means here. Are you asking about the rules of grammar, whether a remark is valid or wether it is sound?

none. I mean if it is the morally preferred, that is, based in personal preference.

 

[Churchill]

under the law there are protected groups. These groups have, in different circumstances, a protected status (here is the AI summary, "groups legally shielded from discrimination and harassment in employment, housing, and public accommodation under federal and state laws, primarily based on characteristics like race, sex, religion, national origin, age (40+), disability, and genetic information")

Now in order to apply this law, each group has to define what it finds to be harassment etc. In any case it is measured against a standard so here is one which uses the word "antisemitism" instead of "harassment based on religion"

if one were to go back into that and replace "Antisemitism" with "Anti-homosexuality" and every "Jew" and "Jewish" with "Gay/s" and "homosexual" would anyone find a problem with adopting this?

what if it was anti-Buddhism? Would it bother anyone to have the definition on the books?

What is inherently wrong with the generic template that makes its use problematic? Or is it that is being used by one group and/or not others?

I do not see why any society would allow a group to outlaw criticisim of a foreign government or a foreign political ideology.

This is what some people seek, for example the oft heard claim that opposing Zionism is commensurate with hating all Jews or insinuates the destruction of all Jews.

That situation must be avoided else a society is doomed, why would anyone approve of any law that could in principle be uised to outlaw criticism of a foreign countries political system?

Does Israel have laws that criminalize the condemnation of any foreign government?

Would the US or UK for example ever seek to define laws that made condemnation of Nazism equiavelent to the call for all Germans to be exterminated?

 

[Lisa558]

Well considering the Hamas, Hezballah, Muslim Brotherhoods Charters are to kill every Jew in Israel id say she is right.

Now you go back to playing Kill the Jew Mr RaggyHead

Thanks. What Churchill is doing, as are other antisemites, is trying to normalize OBVIOUS antisemitism by claiming it isn’t. That’s how the Nazis got previously normal Germans to think it was normal to make Jews walk in the gutter, or bam them from schools, or prohibit them from restaurants.

That’s how haters like Churchill hope to get away with their antisemitism.

And it starts with word-play over the word “antisemite.” That word has applied specifically to being anti-Jew.

 

[toobfreak]

New York Jews actually thought Muslims would appreciate being welcomed.

Oh what a howl, Evil! I mean, the very thought that the Jews in NYC would actually think that muslims would appreciate and respond to being welcomed into the city and respond in kind when in fact, they only see it as a sign of submission and one more easy step forward in converting/conquering the city into dhimmis.

In the past 5,000 years I'm not sure that Muslims have responded to and appreciated anything in kindness, instead, they see kindness as a form of weakness.

I guess that makes NYC no longer the Big Apple, but now instead just another medium-sized falafel.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Actually, no. Forced religion is what “attracts” people to Islam in Islamic majority nations.

In many Islamic majority nations, your head will be separated from your torso if the wrong islamists get to you.

They Changed Their Name to Protect Their Historical Guilt


Those tribes were weeds even before Islam. They were not genetically modified by it. That is why we shouldn't care about the future of the Iranians; the overwhelming majority of them support the Theocrats. The Arabs should annex the Iranian side of the Persian Gulf.

 

[Churchill]

Thanks. What Churchill is doing, as are other antisemites, is trying to normalize OBVIOUS antisemitism by claiming it isn’t. That’s how the Nazis got previously normal Germans to think it was normal to make Jews walk in the gutter, or bam them from schools, or prohibit them from restaurants.

That’s how haters like Churchill hope to get away with their antisemitism.

And it starts with word-play over the word “antisemite.” That word has applied specifically to being anti-Jew.

Please quote any post or even sentence of mine that you choose to intepret as "antisemitic"? Can you do that? because if you can't then it proves you do not understend what the word means.

You do this all the time, using words you do not understand, this casts doubt on the claims you sometimes make about IQ.

The reality is that you are utterly incapable of rational discourse, all you do is froth and fume and scream "antisemites!" when someone says something you don't like, it's pathetic.

Your refusal too, to ever be able to justify your hysterical accusations of "antisemites!" only makes you look foolish, any open minded person reading or exchanges will see you for what you are.

Here's a lesson for you, from a Jew:

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Oh what a howl, Evil! I mean, the very thought that the Jews in NYC would actually think that muslims would appreciate and respond to being welcomed into the city and respond in kind when in fact, they only see it as a sign of submission and one more easy step forward in converting/conquering the city into dhimmis.

In the past 5,000 years I'm not sure that Muslims have responded to and appreciated anything in kindness, instead, they see kindness as a form of weakness.

I guess that makes NYC no longer the Big Apple, but now instead just another medium-sized falafel.

Exactly and to the point.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

TDS Is an Uncontrolled Substance

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Wake up to the Marxist / Islamist colonizing of Europe & America & the UK & Ireland ?

Don't you know -- He repeats Hamas propaganda because they are such libertarians, what with their Honor killings, murder of gay people and marrying off 8 year-old children to grown men and all.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Oh what a howl, Evil! I mean, the very thought that the Jews in NYC would actually think that muslims would appreciate and respond to being welcomed into the city and respond in kind when in fact, they only see it as a sign of submission and one more easy step forward in converting/conquering the city into dhimmis.

In the past 5,000 years I'm not sure that Muslims have responded to and appreciated anything in kindness, instead, they see kindness as a form of weakness.

I guess that makes NYC no longer the Big Apple, but now instead just another medium-sized falafel.

Jesse Jackson's "Hymie Town" Has Become Hamas Town