Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,225
- 2,320
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“There’s something fascinating about science. You get such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.” Mark Twain
Yeah, religion works so much better, and it's not regressive..
Yeah, religion works so much better, and it's not regressive..
The objective of science is that all empirical data that has been gathered through observation, experience and experimentation is without bias. The strength of any scientific research depends on the ability to gather and analyze empirical data in the most unbiased and controlled fashion possible.Yeah, religion works so much better, and it's not regressive..
What works or does not work "better" is not the point. The point is much of the empirical evidence presented as proof of scientific theory is not duplicative.
Theory Of Evolution proves that statement true. Theres no way a human can birth a monkey. Its all made up garbage libtards force on kids to keep them away from the Bible
Aw, billy! "Most" science is "crap"? Skeptics are welcome, but cynics need an attitude adjustment. "Most" science is trial and error, just like most early inventions are. I remember laughing myself almost to tears when I worked the rigs as I heard that you could get a better temperature by sticking something in a patient's ear. Although shouting "Get a horse" was before my time. You hear the word 'science' and go automatically go into denial mode, or like me, laugh at the outrageous claims that may not be that outrageous, just not popular yet. However, I see you are not alone in your reluctance to have faith in new studies, you old curmudgeon, you.Yeah, religion works so much better, and it's not regressive..
What works or does not work "better" is not the point. The point is much of the empirical evidence presented as proof of scientific theory is not duplicative.
Where Science clashes with Science and ReasonAw, billy! "Most" science is "crap"? Skeptics are welcome, but cynics need an attitude adjustment. "Most" science is trial and error, just like most early inventions are. I remember laughing myself almost to tears when I worked the rigs as I heard that you could get a better temperature by sticking something in a patient's ear. Although shouting "Get a horse" was before my time. You hear the word 'science' and go automatically go into denial mode, or like me, laugh at the outrageous claims that may not be that outrageous, just not popular yet. However, I see you are not alone in your reluctance to have faith in new studies, you old curmudgeon, you.
The objective of science is that all empirical data that has been gathered through observation, experience and experimentation is without bias. The strength of any scientific research depends on the ability to gather and analyze empirical data in the most unbiased and controlled fashion possible.Yeah, religion works so much better, and it's not regressive..
What works or does not work "better" is not the point. The point is much of the empirical evidence presented as proof of scientific theory is not duplicative.
Because scientists are human and prone to error, empirical data is often gathered by multiple scientists who independently replicate experiments. This also guards against scientists who unconsciously, or in rare cases consciously, veer from the prescribed research parameters, which could skew the results.
40 years ago if you had a finding it had to be peer reviewed prior to publication.
Aw, billy! "Most" science is "crap"? Skeptics are welcome, but cynics need an attitude adjustment. "Most" science is trial and error, just like most early inventions are. I remember laughing myself almost to tears when I worked the rigs as I heard that you could get a better temperature by sticking something in a patient's ear. Although shouting "Get a horse" was before my time. You hear the word 'science' and go automatically go into denial mode, or like me, laugh at the outrageous claims that may not be that outrageous, just not popular yet. However, I see you are not alone in your reluctance to have faith in new studies, you old curmudgeon, you.Yeah, religion works so much better, and it's not regressive..
What works or does not work "better" is not the point. The point is much of the empirical evidence presented as proof of scientific theory is not duplicative.
You are one dumb fuck. Here you are, talking of how science doesn't work, using a computer to post on the internet, and not even seeing the ridiculous irony of that.
You, you silly fuck. Pretty damned obvious. Our whole civilization as it exists at present, is based on science. Without science, no electricity, no washing machines, cars, or roads. Without science, the average lifespan drops back to less than 45. And here you are, stating science does not work.