Most mass shooters got their guns legally.

[Failzero]

From your article:

In 80% of school shootings, perpetrators got their weapons from family members, according to our data.

Hmmmm........

Uvaldi Shooter got his himself

 

[BULLDOG]

Nice try.

It's fun to watch you ignore everything that doesn't fit your little fairy tale.

If you want to discuss that, then start your own thread.

 

[Failzero]

but it does have to do with taking/restricting guns from people that dont comitt mass shootings and are subject to mass riots

And mass Home Invasion Robberies

 

[BULLDOG]

They were shielded by HIPPA laws ?

WTF?

 

[BULLDOG]

From your article:

In 80% of school shootings, perpetrators got their weapons from family members, according to our data.

Hmmmm........

Legal with no background check.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Legal with no background check.

Like that means anything.

 

[BULLDOG]

but it does have to do with taking/restricting guns from people that dont comitt mass shootings and are subject to mass riots

Drunk driving laws effect drunk drivers who never killed anyone.

 

[BULLDOG]

you do that everyday when you start threads like this and ignore the constitution,,

Yes. I want sane people to see how crazy MAGA cult members are.

 

[BULLDOG]

Like that means anything.

It means those people legally got their guns as the OP claimed.

 

[HikerGuy83]

It means those people legally got their guns as the OP claimed.

The OP's claims are garbage and mean nothing.

 

[BULLDOG]

The OP's claims are garbage and mean nothing.

Then prove them wrong. Prove most mass shooters have to illegally procure their guns.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Then prove them wrong. Prove most mass shooters have to illegally procure their guns.

Don't need to. The claim is meaningless and does nothing to advance the conversation.

As is the case with your posts.

 

[BULLDOG]

Don't need to. The claim is meaningless and does nothing to advance the conversation.

As is the case with your posts.

The claim is the conversation dumb ass.

 

[progressive hunter]

Drunk driving laws effect drunk drivers who never killed anyone.

not like taking guns from people that havent committed a crime,,

if you took their car to prevent drunk driving it would be exactly the same,,

 

[HikerGuy83]

The claim is the conversation dumb ass.

And your posts are no less meaningless now than they were 5 minutes ago.

 

[progressive hunter]

Yes. I want sane people to see how crazy MAGA cult members are.

let us know when that happens,,

so far youre the one that looks like a nutjob,,

more so with your drunk driving comparison,,

 

[BULLDOG]

not like taking guns from people that havent committed a crime,,

if you took their car to prevent drunk driving it would be exactly the same,,

Nope. Being drunk while driving is a good indication that you are likely to hurt someone. You don't take his driving ability until there is an indication that something bad might happen. Being drunk is such an indication.

 

[BULLDOG]

let us know when that happens,,

so far youre the one that looks like a nutjob,,

more so with your drunk driving comparison,,

Post often.

 

[progressive hunter]

Nope. Being drunk while driving is a good indication that you are likely to hurt someone. You don't take his driving ability until there is an indication that something bad might happen. Being drunk is such an indication.

but you dont go take away someones car before theyve even had a drink let alone never planning to drink at all,,,

thats what youre proposing for guns,,

 

[HikerGuy83]

Post often.

Post not at all.