PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #161
So you imagine that calls for violence are the only things being censored?germans did regret allowing nazis to spread their lies through the means of media, under the pretense of "freedom of speech"...
we all know how that played out in history...
calls for violence are NOT "freedom of speech"...
So you think democracies should censor people the government doesn't approve of?
You're a fucking fascist, you realize.
i dont know how a democracy can censor anything(whatever that means) but nobody censoring anything here...
it is a company kicking a user out of its platform because he is violating company terms and conditions...
just like how they have the right and obligation to kick anyone soliciting child pornography out of the system,
they have the right and obligation to kick trump and his fascist gang bang out of the system...
trump needs to code his own app if he really wants to spread his snuff porno...
"i dont know how a democracy can censor anything(whatever that means) "
Democrat outlets Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc., censored and silenced the facts about the bribes the Bidens took from Communist China.
As a result, 17% of Democrat voters claimed they would not have voted for Biden had they known.
Emails from Hunter Biden's laptop
![]()
![]()
Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad
Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine in…
nypost.com![]()
![]()
![]()
Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm
Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be “interesting for me and my family,” emails obtained by The Post show. One…
nypost.com![]()
while we are at it;
lets talk about how trump tried to spread his election lies through these platforms...
obvious violation of the terms and conditions...
hence he got kicked out...
fair and square innit...
![]()
"while we are at it; ..."
We're not "at" anything.......
I simply destroyed your lie, your posting this: "i dont know how a democracy can censor anything(whatever that means) "
"... how trump tried to spread his election lies...."
There were no 'election lies' by Trump, only by Democrats.
But if you'd like to see the worst of lies....
Nothing Trump has prevaricated about amounts to a hill of beans compared to these examples:
1. Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote, saying "When you vote, you're a citizen yourself."
2. After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.
October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table"
The first is an attack on America, the second, on all of Western Civilization.
Did you post about either of those blatant and serious lies?
so your source works only when it fits your narrative ha...
typical...
I forced you to attempt to change the subject.
Must mean you know exactly how wrong you are.
the subject is obvious...
you are a zombie...
you have a set mind and look around only to find patterns that support your narrative...
thats why the social media platforms have rules and regulations to prevent fabricated patterns to spread and infect folks like you...
hence why you see them acting on trump and his gang...
The 'subject' is the Fascist behavior of the Democrat Party.
'Social media' is protected via section 230, based on its promise not to censor political speech.
"Section 230 protects Big Tech from lawsuits. But it was never supposed to be bulletproof.
Big Tech controls the flow of information in America. Arguing that these are merely private companies exercising First Amendment rights is simplistic."
C![]()
Section 230 protects Big Tech from lawsuits. But it was never supposed to be bulletproof.
Big Tech controls the flow of information in America. Arguing that these are merely private companies exercising First Amendment rights is simplistic.www.usatoday.com
The social media lies for the Democrats.....just as you do.
First amendment rights have nothing to do with tech companies. A opinion piece means nothing. Using social media to promote attacks on the US government is not political speech.
Obama did not tell illegals to vote. Another lie.
In terms of Iran, you are expressing your opinion and nothing more.
Soooo......which is your fav.....Pravda, or Izvestia????
Can you help me with this?
Известия – новости политики, экономики, спорта, культуры ...