More Screaming Cry Baby Democrats in Meltdowns....

[XponentialChaos]

I gave you the true answer. You didn't like it.

Would you be tap-dancing this much about the legitimacy of the winning President in 2020 if Trump had won?

I think not.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Nice. Another person can answer the question just fine.

“Do you believe Biden legitimately won in 2020?”

Why can’t you, hadit?

Absolutely not.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Notice how they’re not whining that the election was stolen. Notice how they’re not threatening to storm the Capitol. Notice how they’re accepting that they lost and calling for a peaceful transition of power.

Would you guys have done the same?

Would you go away...please.

 

[hadit]

Would you be tap-dancing this much about the legitimacy of the winning President in 2020 if Trump had won?

I think not.

And again with the mindreading. QPJ won, that's the bottom line.

 

[XponentialChaos]

And again with the mindreading. QPJ won, that's the bottom line.

Yes but you can’t say he won legitimately. That’s the point. I’ve never seen you question the legitimacy of a Republican victory. Hmmm must be a magical coincidence, right?

Maybe you can take a shot at answering when you’re done with your dance recital.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Would you go away...please.

No.

But thanks for asking so nicely.

 

[hadit]

Yes but you can’t say he won legitimately. That’s the point. I’ve never seen you question the legitimacy of a Republican victory. Hmmm must be a magical coincidence, right?

Maybe you can take a shot at answering when you’re done with your dance recital.

Define legitimately. I said he won with questions, questions I notice you don't want to address. I also said there wasn't enough hard evidence to overturn the results of the election, so he won. What's so hard for you to grasp about that?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Define legitimately.

You know what “legitimately” means. You’re twisting yourself into a pretzel because you don’t want to answer the question, not because you lost your dictionary.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I said he won with questions, questions I notice you don't want to address.

Right. And you’ve never once argued that a Republican has won “with questions”, now have you? Their wins are always legitimate.

But when a Democrat wins, well then there are “questions” and you suddenly can’t recall what “legitimately” means.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Define legitimately. I said he won with questions, questions I notice you don't want to address. I also said there wasn't enough hard evidence to overturn the results of the election, so he won. What's so hard for you to grasp about that?

They want us all to believe it was the most fairest, legitimate election of all time . Don't even argue with the fools . 81 million . Yea ok buddy .

 

[hadit]

You know what “legitimately” means. You’re twisting yourself into a pretzel because you don’t want to answer the question, not because you lost your dictionary.

He won with the same legitimacy any president has when he/she wins with questions surrounding the outcome. You know, like JFK's Chicago or Bush's Florida. They won beyond the standard that fraud could be proven. Are you so fixated on a single word that you are blind to reality?

 

[80zephyr]

So Biden legitimately won 4 years ago. Do you agree? Yes or no.

Not sure. But THIS time, we were watching you.

 

[hadit]

They want us all to believe it was the most fairest, legitimate election of all time . Don't even argue with the fools . 81 million . Yea ok buddy .

Exactly, just 4 years after "Russia, Russia, Russia" there's total silence on Russia. Couldn't be because the right guy won, and no one wanted to upset the apple cart.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Exactly, just 4 years after "Russia, Russia, Russia" there's total silence on Russia. Couldn't be because the right guy won, and no one wanted to upset the apple cart.

“Russia, Russia, Russia” is an excellent example.

Would you say that Trump’s win was legitimate or would you say there were “questions” about his victory in 2016?

 

[hadit]

“Russia, Russia, Russia” is an excellent example.

Would you say that Trump’s win was legitimate or would you say there were “questions” about his victory in 2016?

Of course, there were questions that didn't have enough hard evidence to overturn the election, and in that case, took years and millions of dollars to dispel. Most elections have them, including 2020. We've been talking about QPJ's election in 2020, why did you switch?

Oh, I'm sorry, did you think you had a gotcha for a moment there?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Of course, there were questions that didn't have enough hard evidence to overturn the election, and in that case, took years and millions of dollars to dispel. Most elections have them, including 2020. We've been talking about QPJ's election in 2020, why did you switch?

Oh, I'm sorry, did you think you had a gotcha for a moment there?

“Do you believe Trump legitimately won in 2016?” Yes or no.

“Do you believe Trump legitimately won in 2024?” Yes or no.

Watching you twist yourself into a pretzel is very entertaining.

 

[80zephyr]

“Do you believe Trump legitimately won in 2016?” Yes or no.

“Do you believe Trump legitimately won in 2024?” Yes or no.

Watching you twist yourself into a pretzel is very entertaining.

Trump won in 2016. No one thought he was gonna win, so why cheat?

Now, in 2020, he might have been cheated out of winning. The GOP didn't think the Dems would cheat, so they didn't pay attention.

In 2024, the GOP was paying attention, so the election was legit.

 

[hadit]

“Do you believe Trump legitimately won in 2016?” Yes or no.

“Do you believe Trump legitimately won in 2024?” Yes or no.

Watching you twist yourself into a pretzel is very entertaining.

He won with questions in 2016 and without questions (at least so far) in 2024. QPJ won with questions in 2020. I'm being consistent. Why are you flailing around, obsessing over a word? Did you think you found a gotcha that is now taken away from you and your feelz are hurt?

 

[hadit]

Trump won in 2016. No one thought he was gonna win, so why cheat?

Now, in 2020, he might have been cheated out of winning. The GOP didn't think the Dems would cheat, so they didn't pay attention.

In 2024, the GOP was paying attention, so the election was legit.

I don't understand the insistence on a simple answer to a question that doesn't have one. I think it's a gotcha attempt gone awry.

 

[XponentialChaos]

He won with questions in 2016 and without questions (at least so far) in 2024. QPJ won with questions in 2020. I'm being consistent. Why are you flailing around, obsessing over a word? Did you think you found a gotcha that is now taken away from you and your feelz are hurt?

There are always questions, including in 2024. The existence of half-baked conspiracy theories aren’t exclusive to one side.

Agree or disagree?