Idiots FEAE intelligence is INFORMED........ you are the first one.
Haha, this is so "you"...and, by that, I mean moronic.
10s off 1000s of scientists warn of global waing...and you call them all frauds.
43 scientists sign off on a statement that ONLY says that cell phones cannot be ruled out as a cause of cancer...and suddenly it's gospel to you that they do.
Effing embarrassing...
View attachment 191791
Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. - PubMed - NCBI
Well dumbass when you can understand that the HUMAN BODY has electrical currents in it naturally and by so many RADIO WAVES being pushed into us daily at higher frequencies . than normal .. YOU MIGHT GROW A COMMONS SENSE FKN BRAIN and research outside of your FEEL SAFE GOV> PARENTS and the BS LIES THEY FEED YOU STUPID ASSES.
There is nothing about cell phones in that post, you embarrassing idiot.
YEAH YOU ARE EMBARRASSING WITHOUT A DOUBT......
View attachment 191803
View attachment 191804
Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure and Brain Glucose Metabolism
Certain applicants are required to routinely perform an environmental evaluation with respect to determining compliance with the Commission's exposure limits. In the event that an applicant determines the site is not within compliance, the submission of an Environmental Analysis is required. The SAR limits for portable and mobile devices became effective August 7, 1996. The Commission's limits for field strength and power density became effective October 15, 1997 for all services except the Amateur Radio Service. The new limits became effective for the Amateur Radio Service on January 1, 1998. As of September 1, 2000 all FCC licensees were required to be in compliance with the FCC's RF exposure limits (See 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b)(5)).
The following services and devices are generally required to routinely perform an environmental evaluation.However many transmitters licensed under these service categories may be excluded from routine evaluation if they meet certain height and power thresholds (see
OET Bulletin 65 for exclusion criteria).
- Experimental Radio Service - Part 5
- Radio Frequency Devices - Part 15
- Multipoint Distribution Service - Part 21, subpart K
- Paging and Radiotelephone Service - Part 22, subpart E
- Cellular Radiotelephone Service - Part 22, subpart H
- Personal Communications Services - Part 24
- Satellite Communications - Part 25
- General Wireless Communications Service - Part 26
- Wireless Communications Service - Part 27
- Radio Broadcast Services - Part 73
- Experimental, auxiliary, and special broadcast and other program distributional services - Part 74
- Stations in the Maritime Service - Part 80
- Private Land Mobile, Paging Operations - Part 90
- Private Land Mobile, "covered" Specialized Mobile Radio - Part 90
- Amateur Radio Service - Part 97
- Local Multipoint Distribution service - Part 101, subpart L
Mobile and portable devices used as follows:
- Cellular Radio Service
- Personal Communications Service
- Satellite Communications Branch
- General Wireless Communications Service
- Wireless Communications Service
- Maritime Service
- "Covered" Specialized Mobile Radio Service
- Unlicensed PCS and millimeter wave devices
The Commission issued a
Second Memorandum Opinion and Order on August 25, 1997 to address petitions regarding the adoption of new exposure limits. OET has revised OST Bulletin No. 65, to provide guidance on acceptable methods of determining compliance with the Commission's new exposure limits. The revised bulletin,
OET Bulletin 65, Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields was issued simultaneously with the release of the
Second MO&O.
OK i'm board now ... can't fix stupid
can . lead a horse to the water but can't make it drink.........
you believe the bs u shouldn't, and disbelieve the shit you should that's what makes most idiots TRUMP haters LMAO.......
they know you ---- are that dumb.