The first is what sets the basis and tone for the entire Bill of Rights. It provides that these amendments are protections of the citizen, not permissions of the government.
The tax credit is an inducement. Additionally, the 2nd Amendment also implies, though it does not explicitly state, that if you don't wish to exercise your right to own a firearm, you have that right too.
No, this is a bad bill and should be shredded an burned, preferably before this guys eyes.
NOOO,,,the 1st is very specific and only concerns the 5 listed things stated in it and has nothing to do with any of the others,,
you do know its a gimmick law that is never meant to pass???
but as I said the taxs required on current purchases is an infringement today and should be removed,,,
Of course it pertains to the enumerated items in the amendment, but it also adheres to the concept found in all the other amendments known as the Bill of Rights. It cements the concept that these amendments are limitations on government.
I know that the only thing I want to hear from the government when it comes to My ownership of firearms is, "Sorry to have bothered you sir."
although I agree with the 2nd part,,,
the first part is off the wall,,each amendment is specific unto itself and has nothing to do with the others,,as to the first 10 they are specific as to what they say, some require the government not be involved while others give clear instruction as to what the government must do as per the 5th which has both instruction and restriction,,
trying to cross them over is what the progs have been doing to change it, and has caused the problems we currently have
Okay, I don't know why you have a blind spot here, but let Me try it this way.
The Bill of Rights is a limitation on Government, yes?
How do we know that they are limitations of government?
Because of how they are written.
Each one places a restriction on government, i.e., Shall not be infringed, Shall make no law, The right of the people, retained by the people., and so on and so on.