That seems a rather silly statement. Caring about race is quite different than antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief of superiority of a race. In fact, caring about race is the first step in solving racial problems.
A party with very few blacks members, electing very few black Politicians to office, is not a sign of racial antagonism, as the ******* lefties are claiming in this thread.
Tell us more
Eight blacks in the last hundred years
Does that mean Republicans could find no qualified blacks and the only ones qualified were white, male Christians?
It means that very few blacks run as republicans.
ONly a real piece of shit, could spend a lifetime race baiting minorities about how evul and racist the GOP is,
and then point to the lack of minorities in the GOP as something the GOP did wrong.
You are a ******* asshole.
The GOP made a conscious decision to break the solid south by appealing to white southern democrats which was not hard. Democratic leadership in the Whitehouse got the civil rights and the voting act passed which would destroy segregation and promised to put blacks in control in many areas. To southern democrats it was the civil war all over again with the North tramping all over states rights and their way life.
Picking up the banner of states rights was easy for the GOP which was becoming increasing conservative. In less than 20 years, the solid blue south had become the solid red south as year by year more democrats deserted the party, first in national elections and then in local elections.
Today the South is red and southern democrats are most black, a far cry from the party of early 20th century.