noooooooooooooo.............. what i said was that was the start of it. get it right, cartoon boy.
By supporting a civil rights bill by a far larger margin than the dems?
Explain that, very detailed and slowly.
With small words and concise sentences.
wtf is wrong with you?
can't you understand the simplest of terms?
nothing ever goes from A-Z without steps in between.
or in this case (D)s & (R)s being the inclusive vs the exclusive parties. race.... gender equality......gender identity..... religious identity..... or no religious identity................
too many words for you in that last one? too ******* bad.
my
point
stands.
And the act of supporting the Voting RIghts BIll by a higher per centage than the dems, (although BOTH with strong support), is becoming "exclusive" how?
then vs now..... you seem to keep forgetting that. & that is the point.
which mine still stands.
stupid.
You are the one linking then to now, and you are not explaining how that vote, where the republicans voted by 82% for the bill, led to your claim of parties supposedly flipping on race.
I'm fine with the example given. It shows the overall national consensus on equality for blacks that I say has existed since that time period.
You are the one that claims it shows the start of the GOP becoming supposedly "racist".
But you are not explaining HOW it does that, nor how that led to the alleged "flip".
If you can't explain the links in your chain of reasoning, consider that that might be because there is a huge ******* hole in it,
ie it is wrong.