tyroneweaver
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
Not to have US citizens die from stupid gov. Polocies
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz Donated $100,000 to Controversial Muslim Cleric Who Praised Hitler and Hamas
- Thread starter tyroneweaver
- Start date
Freedomisneverfree
Diamond Member
- Jul 28, 2021
- 9,765
- 14,988
- 2,288
Ballz to the Walz is a Communist. That fits right in with the Kamala the Whore believes....
- Mar 31, 2009
- 106,449
- 89,792
- 3,605
Ballz to the Walz is a Communist. That fits right in with the Kamala the Whore believes....
The MSM is trying to label him "Happy Warrior", I saw a Reels and about a dozen outlets were using it.
daveman
Diamond Member
If Vance had done the same thing, you'd be having a hissy fit.
But I guess Democrats, to you, can do no wrong.
daveman
Diamond Member
I am not a leftist.
daveman
Diamond Member
Tim Walz Repeatedly Hosted Muslim Cleric With Pro-Hamas History, Gave Grants To His Group
Great. This retard gave taxpayer money to a terrorist organization.
No wonder Democrats love him.
daveman
Diamond Member
I'm a victim? Of what? Your devastating wit?
If you're so smart, do you know of any reason I shouldn't laugh in your face? Because I can't think of one.
I am very impressed with the reported $100,000.00 donation to the islamo nazi
imam. Is Walz fantastically wealthy?
From WHAT?
daveman
Diamond Member
You lead a rich fantasy life, kid.
daveman
Diamond Member
He gave state taxpayer money to the Hitler-loving terrorist piece of shit.
Is that LEGAL?
HikerGuy83
Diamond Member
- Dec 26, 2021
- 11,994
- 9,189
- 2,138
Ringo
Gold Member
“To hell with their [so-called] culture,” famed ethologist, evolutionary biologist, and prominent popularizer of science Richard Dawkins rages.
On a live TV show, Dawkins bluntly stated: to hell with their so-called culture when it came to modern Islam's practice of forcing women to wear ugly, impenetrable black bags instead of clothing.
On Bill Maher's program on the American cable channel HBO, Dawkins and the host ironized what he called “retrograde liberalism” and the wildly normalized manner - already a habit - of some universities to harass and expel professors who dare to hold “unconventional” - that is, in fact, perfectly reasonable - views of Islam as a religiously colored martial law.
The discussion of Islam came at a time when Dawkins criticized “liberals” who try their best to evade reasoned criticism of religious prejudice under the guise of “respecting the feelings of believers.” “Religion has been given carte blanche to do anything,” the scholar resented. - “It feels like Islam and Muslims are some rare, beautiful and on the verge of extinction species of beings in need of unconditional protection. If you dare to criticize - or say anything at all about their behavior - you are hurting and humiliating them. It's nonsense!”
Maher added fuel to the fire by noting that, strictly speaking, liberals, according to their own views, have a duty to protect all persecuted people, regardless of who the persecutors are. This, he said, includes women who are forced to wear “religious” clothing, whereupon Dawkins literally exploded: “Only for Muslims do these so-called liberals somehow make an exception! In any other case, they would have trumpeted discrimination to the whole universe long ago, but in the case of Muslims, the thesis “it's their distinctive culture” is launched into circulation. Well, to hell with that culture!”
“Criticism of Islam is often called racism,” Dawkins continued. - “Scholars are already afraid to say a word about Islam for fear of being accused of ‘racism’.” An unusually large number of people are somehow convinced that criticism of Islam and racism are the same thing.
Dawkins called the current destruction of free speech on university campuses in America and the rest of the civilized world a tragedy that undermines the foundations of university ethics, unprecedented in the entire existence of the Western university as the most important social institution that ensures the process of consolidation and reproduction of knowledge. “If you can't freely present your views from a university pulpit, then what is the purpose of the institution in the first place?” - Dawkins asks. The university is a temple of freedom, a place where ideas you have not encountered before, or even ideas you have not thought possible before, are born and discussed. If you are only willing to discuss what you agree with, it is no longer a university, but a party meeting.
On social media, Maher was quickly labeled a clown and an ignoramus, and Dawkins was labeled as indulging in “base passions”. However, the proponents of falsely understood “multiculturalism,” who declare “culture” to be any set of troglodyte prejudices they see, were made to understand that there are universal, objective, absolute standards of human rights and human dignity that do not depend on the immediate conjuncture, and to compromise them “out of respect for religion” is not only foolish, but despicable.
“So that's the point! If a culture approves of beating women 'for being disobedient' and does not consider it rape to be forced sex by a husband, then 'to hell with that culture' is a perfectly fair statement!” - writes one commenter on the program's website.
Inside the article on the Sunday Express page is a poll titled “Which is more important - freedom of speech or religious feelings?” in which more than 90% of the more than eleven thousand respondents said “Freedom of speech is more important”.
On a live TV show, Dawkins bluntly stated: to hell with their so-called culture when it came to modern Islam's practice of forcing women to wear ugly, impenetrable black bags instead of clothing.
On Bill Maher's program on the American cable channel HBO, Dawkins and the host ironized what he called “retrograde liberalism” and the wildly normalized manner - already a habit - of some universities to harass and expel professors who dare to hold “unconventional” - that is, in fact, perfectly reasonable - views of Islam as a religiously colored martial law.
The discussion of Islam came at a time when Dawkins criticized “liberals” who try their best to evade reasoned criticism of religious prejudice under the guise of “respecting the feelings of believers.” “Religion has been given carte blanche to do anything,” the scholar resented. - “It feels like Islam and Muslims are some rare, beautiful and on the verge of extinction species of beings in need of unconditional protection. If you dare to criticize - or say anything at all about their behavior - you are hurting and humiliating them. It's nonsense!”
Maher added fuel to the fire by noting that, strictly speaking, liberals, according to their own views, have a duty to protect all persecuted people, regardless of who the persecutors are. This, he said, includes women who are forced to wear “religious” clothing, whereupon Dawkins literally exploded: “Only for Muslims do these so-called liberals somehow make an exception! In any other case, they would have trumpeted discrimination to the whole universe long ago, but in the case of Muslims, the thesis “it's their distinctive culture” is launched into circulation. Well, to hell with that culture!”
“Criticism of Islam is often called racism,” Dawkins continued. - “Scholars are already afraid to say a word about Islam for fear of being accused of ‘racism’.” An unusually large number of people are somehow convinced that criticism of Islam and racism are the same thing.
Dawkins called the current destruction of free speech on university campuses in America and the rest of the civilized world a tragedy that undermines the foundations of university ethics, unprecedented in the entire existence of the Western university as the most important social institution that ensures the process of consolidation and reproduction of knowledge. “If you can't freely present your views from a university pulpit, then what is the purpose of the institution in the first place?” - Dawkins asks. The university is a temple of freedom, a place where ideas you have not encountered before, or even ideas you have not thought possible before, are born and discussed. If you are only willing to discuss what you agree with, it is no longer a university, but a party meeting.
On social media, Maher was quickly labeled a clown and an ignoramus, and Dawkins was labeled as indulging in “base passions”. However, the proponents of falsely understood “multiculturalism,” who declare “culture” to be any set of troglodyte prejudices they see, were made to understand that there are universal, objective, absolute standards of human rights and human dignity that do not depend on the immediate conjuncture, and to compromise them “out of respect for religion” is not only foolish, but despicable.
“So that's the point! If a culture approves of beating women 'for being disobedient' and does not consider it rape to be forced sex by a husband, then 'to hell with that culture' is a perfectly fair statement!” - writes one commenter on the program's website.
Inside the article on the Sunday Express page is a poll titled “Which is more important - freedom of speech or religious feelings?” in which more than 90% of the more than eleven thousand respondents said “Freedom of speech is more important”.
daveman
Diamond Member
Islam is everything liberals hate about Christianity...only far worse.
But liberals give Islam a pass for being backward, oppressive, and fundamentalist.
I am a child of the 60s-----I endured the nonsense. "liberals" seek causes----the "CAUSE" need have no merit -----in fact the
most meritless are the most fervently embraced
Similar threads
New Topics
-
What do you think of the tariffs increasing the price of items at Trader Joe's upsetting affluent liberals?- Started by JakeWIlls92
- Replies: 0
-
America Under the Control of Left-Wing Immigration Policy
- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 0
-
-
Does Anyone Still Not Understand There is No Such Thing as an Unarmed "Insurrection" Like They Tell You J6 Was?- Started by munkle
- Replies: 8
-
Boston ICE agents forced to retreat from murder suspect arrest after activists blew their cover- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 9
