Minnesota Dem State Rep Has Sodomy With 17 Year Old Boy At Public Rest Stop

[Plasmaball]

What the **** are you talking about? EVERYONE in this thread knows his age so who the **** do you think I'm trying to mislead?

i come into this thread not knowing the story and i see your comment, im thinking 13-14 year old.

Bullshit. His age is in the title.

Move along now. Your attempt to ride high has failed

no

 

[bobcollum]

Truth hurts.

You've confused your beliefs with the truth.

No, I believe the truth.

You can't believe the truth.

Your own thoughts have no bearing on something being truthful.

 

[Amelia]

Its outrage either way. Its a public place ya wanna have sex get a hotel room with a closed door.NO ONE should be subject to seeing your naked ass having sex in public no matter it be man/woman,woman/woman or man/man.

!8 year olds have been having sex at drive in movies(public) for more than 50 years. I might have tapped a ***** or two myself at the local drive in.

Maybe you should run down to your local drive in theater tonighty and start taking notes on who's gettin lucky.

And if you were to tap a 17- or 18-year-old ***** at a drive-in at your age, you would deserve the censure which would likely come with that. Legislators who are indiscreet to the point of stupidity open themselves up to distasteful consequences.

People are free to yell hateful things, but they're not free from being reviled for doing so.

Dirty old men are free to have sex with teens who are barely of age. But they're not free from being reviled for doing so.

And if they're elected officials then the consequences could easily and fairly be more than mere censure.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Thread responses show that not only do many of you not protect unborn children but even after birth it is perfectly ok with you if they are preyed upon for deviant behavior.

Sickening

 

[bodecea]

No, my morality is found in the Bible. The world, unfortunately is fallen and satan has influence, hence gay sex.

So you are saying a rape victim has to marry her attacker for life??

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT: If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

And there are lots and lots of such quotes.

Gods law. Maybe you should actually understand what the Bible says before you try tpo use it to defend your stupidity.

So...we are supposed to follow your god's law....or wait...your interpretation of your god's law?

 

[Plasmaball]

If it were a 56-year-old legislator and a 17-year-old girl? Yes, I think so.

some girls are into older men like that. You may not, and may not like it but long as its legal you can just shut the **** up about it and move on.

No. It's a public figure involved. Public figures answer to the public for their imprudent actions.

True, I don't live in Minnesota so the man doesn't answer directly to me. But not living in Wisconsin hasn't stopped a lot of people around here from acting like they have a vested interest in what happens in my state.

Public or not the only thing illegal was sex in a bathroom. Had it been a woman you would have said he was dirty and moved on.

You guys are fishing for something that isnt there.

 

[bobcollum]

Thread responses show that not only do many of you not protect unborn children but even after birth it is perfectly ok with you if they are preyed upon for deviant behavior.

Sickening

What's sickening is your constant attempt to make it sound like the consenting adult was victimized.

 

[Plasmaball]

Thread responses show that not only do many of you not protect unborn children but even after birth it is perfectly ok with you if they are preyed upon for deviant behavior.

Sickening

What's sickening is your constant attempt to make it sound like the consenting adult was victimized.

i wonder how badly Gramps would fight off two hot 18 year old girls who wanted his junk? Somehow i doubt he would run away screaming : You are underage, and i can't handle this hotness. Please for the love of god find me a 40 year old with sagging tits and no threat.

 

[Inthemiddle]

Thread responses show that not only do many of you not protect unborn children but even after birth it is perfectly ok with you if they are preyed upon for deviant behavior.

Sickening

So when we're talking about someone having gay sex, the right wing says that 17 years old is a child being preyed upon by evil gays. But when we're talking about George Zimmerman gunning down Trayvon Martin and claiming it was self defense, all of a sudden the right says 17 years old is a dangerous grown man.

 

[Papageorgio]

Didn't know that sex in public was legal in Minnesota.

I really am not concerned over that fact. Having sex in public locations is a pretty common form of sexual adventure that many people engage in at various times. Whether it's teenagers in a car behind the grocery store, college kids exploring the limits of their sexual adventurousness behind the bushes in a secluded area of campus, or a married couple trying to keep the spark alive in a public bathroom, I really find this kind of personal behavior to be among the least of concerns in the bigger scheme of things.

Good for you, if it is illegal, then it is illegal, whether you think it is common or not is irrelevant.

 

[Amelia]

some girls are into older men like that. You may not, and may not like it but long as its legal you can just shut the **** up about it and move on.

No. It's a public figure involved. Public figures answer to the public for their imprudent actions.

True, I don't live in Minnesota so the man doesn't answer directly to me. But not living in Wisconsin hasn't stopped a lot of people around here from acting like they have a vested interest in what happens in my state.

Public or not the only thing illegal was sex in a bathroom. Had it been a woman you would have said he was dirty and moved on.

You guys are fishing for something that isnt there.

Baloney. It would be just as bad if a 56-year-old man was taking advantage of a 17-year-old girl.

 

[Inthemiddle]

Didn't know that sex in public was legal in Minnesota.

I really am not concerned over that fact. Having sex in public locations is a pretty common form of sexual adventure that many people engage in at various times. Whether it's teenagers in a car behind the grocery store, college kids exploring the limits of their sexual adventurousness behind the bushes in a secluded area of campus, or a married couple trying to keep the spark alive in a public bathroom, I really find this kind of personal behavior to be among the least of concerns in the bigger scheme of things.

Good for you, if it is illegal, then it is illegal, whether you think it is common or not is irrelevant.

You know what's also illegal? Speeding. Gonna ***** every time someone does 50 in a 45 zone?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Thread responses show that not only do many of you not protect unborn children but even after birth it is perfectly ok with you if they are preyed upon for deviant behavior.

Sickening

So when we're talking about someone having gay sex, the right wing says that 17 years old is a child being preyed upon by evil gays. But when we're talking about George Zimmerman gunning down Trayvon Martin and claiming it was self defense, all of a sudden the right says 17 years old is a dangerous grown man.

What kind of bullshit deflection is this? I've made no such comments about the Martin case and you are talking to ME not some vast right-wing group.

And for the record kids can be very dangerous. I know cause I was one of them. Pointless deflection anyhow

 

[Inthemiddle]

Thread responses show that not only do many of you not protect unborn children but even after birth it is perfectly ok with you if they are preyed upon for deviant behavior.

Sickening

So when we're talking about someone having gay sex, the right wing says that 17 years old is a child being preyed upon by evil gays. But when we're talking about George Zimmerman gunning down Trayvon Martin and claiming it was self defense, all of a sudden the right says 17 years old is a dangerous grown man.

What kind of bullshit deflection is this? I've made no such comments about the Martin case and you are talking to ME not some vast right-wing group.

And for the record kids can be very dangerous. I know cause I was one of them. Pointless deflection anyhow

Actually I'm pretty sure I've hit the nail on the head. You're trying fashion the facts around the conclusion you want.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

So when we're talking about someone having gay sex, the right wing says that 17 years old is a child being preyed upon by evil gays. But when we're talking about George Zimmerman gunning down Trayvon Martin and claiming it was self defense, all of a sudden the right says 17 years old is a dangerous grown man.

What kind of bullshit deflection is this? I've made no such comments about the Martin case and you are talking to ME not some vast right-wing group.

And for the record kids can be very dangerous. I know cause I was one of them. Pointless deflection anyhow

Actually I'm pretty sure I've hit the nail on the head. You're trying fashion the facts around the conclusion you want.

And I'm pretty sure you don't know what the **** you're talking about.

 

[Inthemiddle]

What kind of bullshit deflection is this? I've made no such comments about the Martin case and you are talking to ME not some vast right-wing group.

And for the record kids can be very dangerous. I know cause I was one of them. Pointless deflection anyhow

Actually I'm pretty sure I've hit the nail on the head. You're trying fashion the facts around the conclusion you want.

And I'm pretty sure you don't know what the **** you're talking about.

Awww, butt hurt? You know, it would be better to simply admit that your perspective was biased, than to get fussy about the fact being pointed out.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Actually I'm pretty sure I've hit the nail on the head. You're trying fashion the facts around the conclusion you want.

And I'm pretty sure you don't know what the **** you're talking about.

Awww, butt hurt? You know, it would be better to simply admit that your perspective was biased, than to get fussy about the fact being pointed out.

I'd rather just put you on ignore with the other fools. Enjoy pretending I care what you think.

 

[bobcollum]

You do care Gramps, that's why you negged me and several others for thanking a post that you didn't like earlier today.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

You do care Gramps, that's why you negged me and several others for thanking a post that you didn't like earlier today.

I give negs for flagrant stupidity not because I care.

 

[Plasmaball]

No. It's a public figure involved. Public figures answer to the public for their imprudent actions.

True, I don't live in Minnesota so the man doesn't answer directly to me. But not living in Wisconsin hasn't stopped a lot of people around here from acting like they have a vested interest in what happens in my state.

Public or not the only thing illegal was sex in a bathroom. Had it been a woman you would have said he was dirty and moved on.

You guys are fishing for something that isnt there.

Baloney. It would be just as bad if a 56-year-old man was taking advantage of a 17-year-old girl.

nah but then you are coming off like a prude.