Military has new weapon Sonic Weapon: LRAD or Active Denial System Used Against Peaceful Protesters in Belgrade

Parker99

Gold Member
Joined
May 7, 2017
Messages
393
Reaction score
135
Points
188
3 months ago a powerful Sound cannon "LRAD" was used against people during a moment of silence in Serbia. The sound was so loud and terrifying that made everyone panic in an instant and search for cover. Serbian officials are still denying that anything was used. (Multiple Angles)

Sonic Weapon: LRAD or Active Denial System Used Against Peaceful Protesters in Belgrade?

 
It first appeared over 20 years ago and more recent developments are within Black Projects .
Sound / Frequencies are at the cutting edge of many weapon areas and none more so when the enemy are Sheeple that need controlling.
We might see more of it in open use later this year if Civil Insurrection occurs widely.
It cuts overheads dramatically !!!
 
How is this military? That was law enforcement, not military.

And this is hardly "new", this has been around for decades.
 
Yes. That was used by the Serbian Gendarmerie, not the military.

Tell you what, next time try actually presenting facts and not trying to post vague claims without anything to back them up with.

But it is the military that do research into these technologies not the police.
 
But it is the military that do research into these technologies not the police.

Wrong, this is exactly the type of thing that has been developed for decades for law enforcement, not the military.

Tasers, pepper spray, strobe lights, add in this and many other things. Almost no real military application, endless law enforcement applications.

Even bullet proof vests. Don't believe me, look up the history of Kevlar. Created to help develop a better tire, but when the ballistic capabilities became known the National Institute for Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice suggested the new material be applied to making protective vests for law enforcement.

This is yet another topic I have seen you posting over and over again. Absolutely no effort, you simply proclaiming your own beliefs with nothing other than your own beliefs to back it up. And when you do provide a reference (like in this case), it outright contradicts your claims.

And your responses when challenged? "No, you are wrong".

I am just about done with this. Denying when somebody shows multiple times that you are wrong by simply shaking your head and burying it in the sand is rather pathetic.
 
That term has become something of a joke lately.

CNN-Headline-Fiery-2.jpg
 
Wrong, this is exactly the type of thing that has been developed for decades for law enforcement, not the military.

Tasers, pepper spray, strobe lights, add in this and many other things. Almost no real military application, endless law enforcement applications.

Even bullet proof vests. Don't believe me, look up the history of Kevlar. Created to help develop a better tire, but when the ballistic capabilities became known the National Institute for Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice suggested the new material be applied to making protective vests for law enforcement.

This is yet another topic I have seen you posting over and over again. Absolutely no effort, you simply proclaiming your own beliefs with nothing other than your own beliefs to back it up. And when you do provide a reference (like in this case), it outright contradicts your claims.

And your responses when challenged? "No, you are wrong".

I am just about done with this. Denying when somebody shows multiple times that you are wrong by simply shaking your head and burying it in the sand is rather pathetic.

Do you have source that police spend money and have done research and developed on it and not the US military.
 
Do you have source that police spend money and have done research and developed on it and not the US military.

I just freaking gave several! Kevlar, when the National Institute for Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice had research into having it used for bullet proof vests back in 1971! The freaking US military did not get involved in that for another decade, long after it was in common use by law enforcement globally. Because I was in the military then, and we did not get Kevlar until the PASGT equipment was first issued in 1982. And it did not see wide-spread adoption until 1985.

Before 1985, we were still using the freaking P-1955 body armor. Made in, you guess it, 1955. That was the vest most well known for use in Vietnam, and used hard fiberglass plates to try and protect the wearer. Yes, we were still using that thing almost three decades later.



MACE, Pepper Spray, add in tear gas, those like this are all crowd control equipment. None of them is of any use to the military, those are all 100% civilian law enforcement equipment. The military might adopt it later, but it has absolutely no purpose on the battlefield. In fact, using things like tear gas on the battlefield is actually illegal!

Yes, the use of tear gas on the battlefield is actually explicitly illegal under the Chemical Weapons Convention. So why in the hell would the military spend a single penny on something they are outright prohibited from using on the battlefield?

Look, I am done with this. You outright ignore anything you do not like, and do no research yourself. That is not how debate works, unless one is a complete mental moron. You use facts and references to prove your point, you do not simply ignore anything you do not like and then challenge others to provide sources. Especially when they provide sources you outright rejected the first time.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom