There were no WMDs in Iraq The shit that was found was ancient munitions hardly worth deactivating
You know you just contradicted yourself in your own post.
1. Yes, WMD WAS found in Iraq.
2. Yes, it was 'old' yet still lethal. To be specific, the warheads found contained chemical weapons, AND the serial numbers on the weapons matched the weapons on the list of WMD Hussein reported to the UN as already having been
destroyed.
This proved that Hussein LIED to the UN, that Hussein did NOT destroy all of the WMD he SAID he did. The 'There was no WMD in Iraq' crowd want to brush this FACT off as some insignificant anomaly and STILL take the lying 'Butcher of Baghdad's word that this was the ONLY WMD he failed to destroy as reported. Well, of course - if you can't take the word of a man nicknamed the 'Butcher of Baghdad'. known for gassing his own people in the past, who just was caught lying to you, then who can your trust, right?!
It's like Liberals arguing nearly to the death about how 'illegals don't vote in US elections' and declare no one can find one case of it. When you find a case they then shift the argument to 'That's the only one'...so you point out more...and their 'line in the sand' changes again, but they keep declaring 'it doesn't happen' - people who illegally came into our country wouldn't break US laws like that.
WHY do liberals so naturally and rabidly defend the criminals, the dictators, and the terrorists. Obama was constantly defending terrorists, threatening US citizens with legal action if they exercised their Right of Free Speech by talking negatively about Islamic Extremists...defending illegals who have robbed, raped, stolen, murdered, committed pedophilia, etc...Libs have, like you, have defended Hussein, claiming he was / his trustworthy and was telling the truth. HE WASN'T. HE LIED. Those chemical-filled grenade heads were proof.