MEGA BUSTED! NAACP Caught as the real racists while they lie about the Tea Party

[Ravi]

Anyone with a lick of honesty in them realizes the audience is laughing because Sherrod is going to be corrected by God for her racial bias against the white farmer.

Yea that's why we all laugh at pedophiles because we know that God is going to correct them for their sinful ways.


Do you really believe the shit you write?

You're an idiot, seriously.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Anyone with a lick of honesty in them realizes the audience is laughing because Sherrod is going to be corrected by God for her racial bias against the white farmer.

Yea that's why we all laugh at pedophiles because we know that God is going to correct them for their sinful ways.


Do you really believe the shit you write?

You're an idiot, seriously.

I'll take that as a yes.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Yea that's why we all laugh at pedophiles because we know that God is going to correct them for their sinful ways.


Do you really believe the shit you write?

You're an idiot, seriously.

I'll take that as a yes.

I think that's all Ravi has it liar or idiot!

Limited vocabulary!

 

[Bass v 2.0]

So she decided not to help the white farmer owner when she should have, because he was white. That she doesn't like helping white people because black farm owners lost there land.

Then she says she sent him to his own for help, but he didn't help. Is she his own? I mean they are both Americans! What a crock of shit!

Then she brags about not being laid off in the Federal Government! The Tea Party members are heros!

And that is why the left hate them!

They are standing up to the thugs and RACIST hacks of the left.

Here you go Teabagger cum shameless monkey, the entire full video that debunks your crap:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk]YouTube - Shirley Sherrod: the FULL video[/ame]

The NAACP did not applaud Sherrod when she admitted not being fully helpful, look at the video starting from 16:58 where she starts talking about the issue.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

BTW you distorting Teabagging scum, Sherrod was *NOT* in a federally appointed position when this incident took place, she was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling farmers.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

BTW you distorting Teabagging scum, Sherrod was *NOT* in a federally appointed position when this incident took place, she was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling farmers.

Correction: She was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling black farmers.

 

[gautama]

I'm a a girl you moron, so your insults about being a woman don't work.



And I'm not a racist either. It has nothing to do with PC and something to do with having a brain that fights against bad policies and NOT skin color. Take your racist trash somewhere else and get the hell out of my thread.

Whether you're a man or a woman is irrelevant.....except the obvious: you ARE a dickless crunt.

All my points re Black Racism and/or list of Obami Salaami's failures are FACTUALLY correct. And, the other comments including teaching you LOGIC are also FACTS. Your opinion about my "racism" is of eminent non interest to me except to point out ANOTHER one of your errors in logic you silly twat: I couldn't be a White Racist (by definition) if I am willing to elect Stanford Univ Prof Thomas Sowell (a Black) as POTUS.

So....disprove any one of my points if you can, you pussy-wussy crunt.

And, as stated, it is ALSO a FACT that you're reactions to the Black Racist PC BULLSHIT i.e., playing the "I'm HOLIER than THOU re RACISM game " is falling into their Black Racist PC CRAP.

And my original conclusion is correct. Get yourself a DRANO-laden enema to purge yourself of the illusion that Black Racism mentioned by me does not exist.

As to your other illusion regarding your proprietary control of a published thread....you can stick that up your arse before or after your enema.

​

You can label anyone anyway you want....but when you were required to provide PROOF that I stated anything but the Truth.....YOU SIMPLY RESORTED TO INSULTS .

Conclusion: As stated, you're just another dickless crunt with a God-Complex.

 

[AllieBaba]

Am I the only one who watched this video and thought, good, she learned something.

She said she learned in that incident that it wasn't about color, but money.

I don't see how that makes her a racist. And consider the audience. That audience doesn't want to hear that. So actually, I'm a little reassured by the film.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

BTW you distorting Teabagging scum, Sherrod was *NOT* in a federally appointed position when this incident took place, she was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling farmers.

Correction: She was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling black farmers.

You shouldn't have to wonder why I keep telling you to shut up, shut up, shut up its the lying, dishonest posts like the one above that make me do it.

 

[Ravi]

Am I the only one who watched this video and thought, good, she learned something.

She said she learned in that incident that it wasn't about color, but money.

I don't see how that makes her a racist. And consider the audience. That audience doesn't want to hear that. So actually, I'm a little reassured by the film.

hmmmm....what a stupid thing to say. They agreed with her.

 

[konradv]

BTW you distorting Teabagging scum, Sherrod was *NOT* in a federally appointed position when this incident took place, she was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling farmers.

Correction: She was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling black farmers.

Just keep piling lie upon lie, right?!?!

Anderson Cooper 360: Blog Archive - Video: Farmer: Sherrod criticism is 'hogwash' - CNN.com Blogs

 

[Liability]

Am I the only one who watched this video and thought, good, she learned something.

She said she learned in that incident that it wasn't about color, but money.

I don't see how that makes her a racist. And consider the audience. That audience doesn't want to hear that. So actually, I'm a little reassured by the film.

This whole "objectivity" thing could make some people annoyed with you.

But seriously, my take on the Ms. Sherrod speech is that she was acknowledging (or admitting or confessing) that in that day in the past she had some racist thinking going on. I didn't see her confessing to ACTING on her prejudice. No. Instead, she merely admitted that she HAD harbored such thoughts. But then she put her own bias aside and did her job.

Isn't that what she was supposed to do?

Even the white farmer in question has made it clear that she treated him fairly (at least within the parameters of the program being administered). He says that she was NOT a racist and thanks her for the HELP she gave.

This whole thing got blown out of proportion. Even the NAACP seems to have rushed to judgment. But they seem willing to confess their own error.

Even the President seems to have caught on.

I think the story tells a few different tales. But I don't see how anyone can possibly -- at least not in good faith -- conclude that Ms. Sherrod "is" a racist. I saw her interviewed. My conclusion is that she is not a racist and that we should all turn the page at this point.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

BTW you distorting Teabagging scum, Sherrod was *NOT* in a federally appointed position when this incident took place, she was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling farmers.

Correction: She was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling black farmers.

You shouldn't have to wonder why I keep telling you to shut up, shut up, shut up its the lying, dishonest posts like the one above that make me do it.

You just proved how utterly stupid you are. The racist bitch admitted to "NOT doing as much as she could", that she did "just enough" by sending him to "one of his own kind".

You can tell folks to shut up all you want but it does no good, I don't see anyone shutting up. Bring your ass to Rosharon, Texas and tell me to shut up tough guy.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

BTW you distorting Teabagging scum, Sherrod was *NOT* in a federally appointed position when this incident took place, she was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling farmers.

Correction: She was in a nonprofit group that helps struggling black farmers.

Just keep piling lie upon lie, right?!?!

Anderson Cooper 360: Blog Archive - Video: Farmer: Sherrod criticism is 'hogwash' - CNN.com Blogs

It's not a lie, she admitted as much.

 

[Ravi]

Am I the only one who watched this video and thought, good, she learned something.

She said she learned in that incident that it wasn't about color, but money.

I don't see how that makes her a racist. And consider the audience. That audience doesn't want to hear that. So actually, I'm a little reassured by the film.

This whole "objectivity" thing could make some people annoyed with you.

But seriously, my take on the Ms. Sherrod speech is that she was acknowledging (or admitting or confessing) that in that day in the past she had some racist thinking going on. I didn't see her confessing to ACTING on her prejudice. No. Instead, she merely admitted that she HAD harbored such thoughts. But then she put her own bias aside and did her job.

Isn't that what she was supposed to do?

Even the white farmer in question has made it clear that she treated him fairly (at least within the parameters of the program being administered). He says that she was NOT a racist and thanks her for the HELP she gave.

This whole thing got blown out of proportion. Even the NAACP seems to have rushed to judgment. But they seem willing to confess their own error.

Even the President seems to have caught on.

I think the story tells a few different tales. But I don't see how anyone can possibly -- at least not in good faith -- conclude that Ms. Sherrod "is" a racist. I saw her interviewed. My conclusion is that she is not a racist and that we should all turn the page at this point.

Just curious...does the part I bolded mean you don't believe she engaged in a racist action?

 

[Truthmatters]

Am I the only one who watched this video and thought, good, she learned something.

She said she learned in that incident that it wasn't about color, but money.

I don't see how that makes her a racist. And consider the audience. That audience doesn't want to hear that. So actually, I'm a little reassured by the film.

This whole "objectivity" thing could make some people annoyed with you.

But seriously, my take on the Ms. Sherrod speech is that she was acknowledging (or admitting or confessing) that in that day in the past she had some racist thinking going on. I didn't see her confessing to ACTING on her prejudice. No. Instead, she merely admitted that she HAD harbored such thoughts. But then she put her own bias aside and did her job.

Isn't that what she was supposed to do?

Even the white farmer in question has made it clear that she treated him fairly (at least within the parameters of the program being administered). He says that she was NOT a racist and thanks her for the HELP she gave.

This whole thing got blown out of proportion. Even the NAACP seems to have rushed to judgment. But they seem willing to confess their own error.

Even the President seems to have caught on.

I think the story tells a few different tales. But I don't see how anyone can possibly -- at least not in good faith -- conclude that Ms. Sherrod "is" a racist. I saw her interviewed. My conclusion is that she is not a racist and that we should all turn the page at this point.

I want to praise you two for being the people I had always hoped you would be.


There is a time for Americans to stop and think and come together and not let those in this world who wish to see the US embroiled in a fever of hate.

Now I hope you will join me in never again allowing ANYTHING Breitbart says to have sway over anything.

The man has now done this to this country more than once (the ACORN tapes) and he should NEVER be allowed to do it again.

Thank you so much for these thoughtful posts

 

[Liability]

Am I the only one who watched this video and thought, good, she learned something.

She said she learned in that incident that it wasn't about color, but money.

I don't see how that makes her a racist. And consider the audience. That audience doesn't want to hear that. So actually, I'm a little reassured by the film.

This whole "objectivity" thing could make some people annoyed with you.

But seriously, my take on the Ms. Sherrod speech is that she was acknowledging (or admitting or confessing) that in that day in the past she had some racist thinking going on. I didn't see her confessing to ACTING on her prejudice. No. Instead, she merely admitted that she HAD harbored such thoughts. But then she put her own bias aside and did her job.

Isn't that what she was supposed to do?

Even the white farmer in question has made it clear that she treated him fairly (at least within the parameters of the program being administered). He says that she was NOT a racist and thanks her for the HELP she gave.

This whole thing got blown out of proportion. Even the NAACP seems to have rushed to judgment. But they seem willing to confess their own error.

Even the President seems to have caught on.

I think the story tells a few different tales. But I don't see how anyone can possibly -- at least not in good faith -- conclude that Ms. Sherrod "is" a racist. I saw her interviewed. My conclusion is that she is not a racist and that we should all turn the page at this point.

Just curious...does the part I bolded mean you don't believe she engaged in a racist action?

Kind of, yes. She admitted having harbored racist thoughts, but ultimately (even back in those long-ago days) she seems to have not allowed her racial bitterness impede her from delivering on behalf of that white farmer.

Plus, as I noted before, I saw that white farmer himself express gratitude for the service he received from Ms. Sherrod, and he specifically denied that she was a racist. I figure if HE doesn't see what she did as having been anything racist, maybe I'm not justified in reaching any different conclusion.

If you are suggesting that maybe she did provide lesser effort to him (it is a bit unclear to me whether that ever happened), then all I can say is, "Maybe. I don't know." Perhaps I'm missing something, though. Can you tell me what she did that she shouldn't have done or what she didn't do that she ought to have done?

As for the speech she gave, it seems to me that what she was saying was that it would be wrong to permit personal feelings of racial disaffection to interfere with her responsibilities. And that certainly seems like a truthful and noble sentiment.

 

[Ravi]

This whole "objectivity" thing could make some people annoyed with you.

But seriously, my take on the Ms. Sherrod speech is that she was acknowledging (or admitting or confessing) that in that day in the past she had some racist thinking going on. I didn't see her confessing to ACTING on her prejudice. No. Instead, she merely admitted that she HAD harbored such thoughts. But then she put her own bias aside and did her job.

Isn't that what she was supposed to do?

Even the white farmer in question has made it clear that she treated him fairly (at least within the parameters of the program being administered). He says that she was NOT a racist and thanks her for the HELP she gave.

This whole thing got blown out of proportion. Even the NAACP seems to have rushed to judgment. But they seem willing to confess their own error.

Even the President seems to have caught on.

I think the story tells a few different tales. But I don't see how anyone can possibly -- at least not in good faith -- conclude that Ms. Sherrod "is" a racist. I saw her interviewed. My conclusion is that she is not a racist and that we should all turn the page at this point.

Just curious...does the part I bolded mean you don't believe she engaged in a racist action?

Kind of, yes. She admitted having harbored racist thoughts, but ultimately (even back in those long-ago days) she seems to have not allowed her racial bitterness impede her from delivering on behalf of that white farmer.

Plus, as I noted before, I saw that white farmer himself express gratitude to the service he received from Ms. Sherrod, and he specifically denied that she was a racist. I figure if HE doesn't see what she did as having been anything racist, maybe I'm not justified in reaching any different conclusion.

If you are suggesting that maybe she did provide lesser effort to him (it is a bit unclear to me whether that ever happened), then all can say is, "Maybe. I don't know." Perhaps I'm missing something, though. Can you tell me what she did that she shouldn't have done or what she didn't do that she ought to have done?

As for the speech she gave, it seems to me that what she was saying was that it would be wrong to permit personal feelings of racial disaffection to interfere with her responsibilities. And that certainly seems like a truthful and noble sentiment.

No...I agree with you. I'm just dealing with someone in another thread who insists she committed a racist act. I think what you've posted makes perfect sense and pretty much follows my line of thinking.

 

[Liability]

Just curious...does the part I bolded mean you don't believe she engaged in a racist action?

Kind of, yes. She admitted having harbored racist thoughts, but ultimately (even back in those long-ago days) she seems to have not allowed her racial bitterness impede her from delivering on behalf of that white farmer.

Plus, as I noted before, I saw that white farmer himself express gratitude to the service he received from Ms. Sherrod, and he specifically denied that she was a racist. I figure if HE doesn't see what she did as having been anything racist, maybe I'm not justified in reaching any different conclusion.

If you are suggesting that maybe she did provide lesser effort to him (it is a bit unclear to me whether that ever happened), then all can say is, "Maybe. I don't know." Perhaps I'm missing something, though. Can you tell me what she did that she shouldn't have done or what she didn't do that she ought to have done?

As for the speech she gave, it seems to me that what she was saying was that it would be wrong to permit personal feelings of racial disaffection to interfere with her responsibilities. And that certainly seems like a truthful and noble sentiment.

No...I agree with you. I'm just dealing with someone in another thread who insists she committed a racist act. I think what you've posted makes perfect sense and pretty much follows my line of thinking.

I understand that finding that you and I agree on something can be jarring. "Ah feel your pain."

But, hell, some things really do turn out to be uncomplicated. I confess it. I was right on the verge of rushing to judgment regarding Ms. Sherrod's speech. But then I saw a piece on NBC (I believe it was on the Today show). Ms. Sherrod was given a pretty full chance to speak her mind. The piece also provided a video clip of the very white farmer about whom she had spoken. HE, himself, defended her and credited her with having saved his farm. In that light, I went back to hear her speech again. It was at that point that I realized that she appears to have been the victim of being quoted very much out of context.

I'll go one step further. Anybody, like her, who may have harbored some racist sentiments in the past but who chose NOT to ACT on that sordid sentiment deserves some congratulations. The improper sentiments are not a good thing, but making a conscious choice to not permit those sentiments to dictate one's behavior is a very good thing. I think it takes a fair amount of personal insight to recognize a huge negative like that and then something even rarer to accept the burden of publicly admitting it. It takes guts, honesty and integrity.

And I'm still at a loss to see what she did OTHER THAN refuse to permit her racist feelings to dictate her actions.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Racists you can't get away with lying about others to cover up your own racism!

YouTube - NAACP Bigotry in their ranks

YouTube - Federal jobs

But the new media will not be silenced. It will not allow for the main stream media to propagate hateful and hurtful lies in order to save the Democratic Party from the toxic choices it has made over the past few years. And by bringing up race, and demanding a zero tolerance of racism, the left, and the NAACP in particular, has opened itself up for scrutiny.
We are in possession of a video from in which Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development, speaks at the NAACP Freedom Fund dinner in Georgia. In her meandering speech to what appears to be an all-black audience, this federally appointed executive bureaucrat lays out in stark detail, that her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions.

In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn’t do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from “one of his own kind”. She refers him to a white lawyer.

Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance.

Video Proof: The NAACP Awards Racism?2010 - Big Government



OH so busted!

Liberals try to LIE and fabricate racism from the tea party, but LOOK WHO REALLY ARE THE RACISTS????

As usual, liberals accuse in others what they refuse to see in themselves.

This is some funny stuff. Because it really shows their hypocrisy.

turns out that it was the rightwing that LIED and edited this tape samurai....will we hear YOUR APOLOGY?

This tape was NOT edited. It just didn't include the full speech.

Yeah, she goes on later to give a CYA. Yes, she discrimiminated, but she "learned" from it not to be racist. Hey! Too late! You already did discriminate against a white farmer.

And I have two words to say to ANYONE who thinks I should apologize: MACACACA and NIGGARDLY!

If I had a DIME for every edited tape and transcript liberals have brought up to say Rush Limbaugh, the tea party, Bush, et al were "racists" I'd be a rich woman.

And the "racist" stuff Rush Limbaugh said, WASN'T EVEN TRUE. It was made up and yet it was reported as true.

Has their EVER been apologies from the left?

Gee I'm sorry Reagan. There weren't three million homless during your admin and you didn't cheap out on AIDS research. It was just a political ploy. Our bad.

Gee, I'm sorry Pres Bush 41, for getting all over you for breaking your "no new taxes" promise AT THE BEHEST OF THE DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED CONGRESS to reduce the deficit, using that slogan to get Clinton elected. Then breaking OUR middle class tax cut, by raising taxes retroactive to Jan 1.

Gee, I'm sorry Pres Bush 43 for trying to steal the election in 2000 by hanging chads then claiming it was you that tried to steal the election. Gee, I'm sorry that we in the press lied that it was a 5/4 decision by the USSC, when the truth was it was a 7/2 decision.

Gee, I'm sorry Pres Bush 43, that we all said you lied about WMDs when the truth was we ALL said Saddam had WMDs back to President Clinton in 1998.

Gee, I'm sorry that we said you and Rove outed Valerie Plame when we knew it was Richard Armitage.

Gee, I'm sorry we lied about those 16 words, when we knew it was the truth that Saddam was trying to get Yellow Cake from Niger.

Gee, I'm sorry we believed the lies of Joe Wilson.

Gee, I'm sorry we were more concerned with Macaca than New Black Panthers standing outside of a Penn voting place.

Gee, I'm sorry that we lied about Rush Limbaugh making all those racist statements, using a book by an author who later admitted he made them up.

Gee, I'm sorry that we lied about the Tea Party claiming they called Rep Carson and others the N word when the truth is, we STILL can't produce a video proving that (but the Tea Party has released video after video on YouTube showing they didn't)

That's just a FEW of the lies the left has told over and OVER for I don't know how long, and YOU WANT AN APOLOGY FROM ME?

YEAH RIGHT!!!!!!

I didn't lie, and neither did Breitbart.

He didn't fabricate that video. It DOES show Sherrod saying she DELIBERATELY discriminated against a white farmer. "Learning" from it later doesn't change the fact she discriminated.

How many times were their apologies from Trent Lott, George Allen and that poor sap who's only crime was being educated enough to know what niggardly means?

Were their apologies after the Duke Lacrosse fiasco? Twana Brawly? And a number of other Hoaxes mean to destroy people simply because of their skin color?

You lefties asked for it. You think you can lie, smear, and destroy people, we can never do anything about it. WELL GUESS AGAIN.

The NAACP fired the first shot, claiming the Tea Party is racist and the Tea Party is not going to be quiet and will NOT back down. It is not racist to fight a lie.

You on the left wanted to play hard ball. My philosophy has always been you want to play hard ball, I'll teach you the rules.

And I won't have to lie to do it, and I won't bow to a ludicrous double standard, either.

BRING IT ON.