I have always maintained that we should leave Soros' 'Nazi' affiliations out of any debate about him - it is unfair to hold him fully accountable for his actions at that time. Although I do find his attitude towards that period of his life to be somewhat disconcerting. I don't understand how anyone with any morals would not feel some guilt over their actions.
Besides, there are far more important, and relevant, reasons to attack Soros.
Exactly. Though it can give some insight into why a person is who they are now, when it is more than 60 years later, nobody should hold somebody accountable for what they thought, said, or did at Age 14.
But in retrospect, Soros recounts that time in some detail including how he felt then. Remembering it so well, wouldn't you now think he would express some sense of at least regret for his actions? And because there is nothing in his words or his writings to suggest that he does now feel some regret for that time, is it unreasonable to note that there is no indication that he does?
Soros himself has well funded some pretty radical or far leftwing stuff with deliberate attempt to support the election of public figures and to take down public figures. That makes him fair game for analysis, critique, and criticism.