Maybe the SCOTUS is about to connect some more dots!

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It’s overturned is inevitable based entirely on your writings above.

How so...are you claiming that there is in fact a compelling government or societal interest is banning same sex marriage? If so what is it? Spell it out!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Gays were never restricted from marrying. That has been well established

Gays were prevented from marrying the person who they have a romantic and sexual attraction to. heterosexual faced no such restrictions. Gays often felt that they had to enter into loveless sham marriages with someone of the opposite sex for purposed of appearances. That is not equality....but I don't suppose that you care much about that detail. You just want to score what you think is a clever "gotcha" point. It is no clever

I doubt that you believe your own inane equine excrement. In order to believe it you would have to be too stupid to stay alive on your own for very long. You would probably need help wiping your own ass.

Oh !! Sorry!! You do need help wiping your own ass??

 

[HeyNorm]

Gays were prevented from marrying the person who they have a romantic and sexual attraction to. heterosexual faced no such restrictions. Gays often felt that they had to enter into loveless sham marriages with someone of the opposite sex for purposed of appearances. That is not equality....but I don't suppose that you care much about that detail. You just want to score what you think is a clever "gotcha" point. It is no clever

I doubt that you believe your own inane equine excrement. In order to believe it you would have to be too stupid to stay alive on your own for very long. You would probably need help wiping your own ass.

Oh !! Sorry!! You do need help wiping your own ass??

Show me in the law where a marriage requires “Love”. Many people marry for other reasons. Money, Power, status. I’ve known all.

The only requirements were, a consenting Male joining with a consenting Female, not to closely related (which prior to Obergfell made complete sense) and of legal age.

And who in hell says someone can’t “Love” more than one person? Makes zero sense since that absurd obergfell ruling.

You want equality? So do polygamists. And if “Love” is the only requirement to marry, it’s insane to qualify the numbers that can join in wedded bliss.

 

[Chuz Life]

Show me in the law where a marriage requires “Love”. Many people marry for other reasons. Money, Power, status. I’ve known all.

Citizenship.

Ilhan Omar DID marry her brother, reveals Somali community leader

Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar told friends years ago that the man who went on to become her second husband was in fact her brother, DailyMail.com can confirm.

www.dailymail.co.uk

The only requirements were, a consenting Male joining with a consenting Female, not to closely related (which prior to Obergfell made complete sense) and of legal age.

Oh... Someone needs to inform Ohmar about that.

And who in hell says someone can’t “Love” more than one person? Makes zero sense since that absurd obergfell ruling.

You want equality? So do polygamists. And if “Love” is the only requirement to marry, it’s insane to qualify the numbers that can join in wedded bliss.

100%

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Show me in the law where a marriage requires “Love”. Many people marry for other reasons. Money, Power, status. I’ve known all.

The only requirements were, a consenting Male joining with a consenting Female, not to closely related (which prior to Obergfell made complete sense) and of legal age.

And who in hell says someone can’t “Love” more than one person? Makes zero sense since that absurd obergfell ruling.

You want equality? So do polygamists. And if “Love” is the only requirement to marry, it’s insane to qualify the numbers that can join in wedded bliss.

Still looking for someone to wipe your ass ? Show me whet I said that love is a requirement for marriage. I said that gay people were denied the ability to marry for love while straight people were able to, is it remotely possible that you are not bright enough to understand that and that it is discrimination? You are either really stupid or just play an sick and diabolical game. There other possibility is that you not even real…that you’re a zombie troll bot that has been programs to spit out obnoxious bullshit at set intervals

And where the **** did I say that people can’t love more than one person.? Of course they can . I am a big fan of polyamory. So what the **** is your point with that. Never mind, There is no point. It’s just a red herring logical fallacy that has nothing to do with the points that I made And, you reference to polygamy is just another distraction from the topic and marriage equality

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Citizenship.

Ilhan Omar DID marry her brother, reveals Somali community leader

Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar told friends years ago that the man who went on to become her second husband was in fact her brother, DailyMail.com can confirm.

www.dailymail.co.uk

View attachment 1151534

Oh... Someone needs to inform Ohmar about that.


100%

Now you're just trolling your own thread with shit that has nothing to do do with the topic. Is there something wrong with you?? Nevermind

 

[HeyNorm]

Still looking for someone to wipe your ass ? Show me whet I said that love is a requirement for marriage. I said that gay people were denied the ability to marry for love while straight people were able to, is it remotely possible that you are not bright enough to understand that and that it is discrimination? You are either really stupid or just play an sick and diabolical game. There other possibility is that you not even real…that you’re a zombie troll bot that has been programs to spit out obnoxious bullshit at set intervals

And where the **** did I say that people can’t love more than one person.? Of course they can . I am a big fan of polyamory. So what the **** is your point with that. Never mind, There is no point. It’s just a red herring logical fallacy that has nothing to do with the points that I made And, you reference to polygamy is just another distraction from the topic and marriage equality

There IS NO RIGHT TO MARRY THE PERSON YOU WANT!

Good lord.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

There IS NO RIGHT TO MARRY THE PERSON YOU WANT!

Good lord.

Tell that to the heterosexual who is in love and who has been given every reason to believe that they will be able to marry that person. Marrying the person of your choice has been treated as a right , The supreme court, on at least 14 times has stated that marriage is a fundamental right and that means marrying the person of ones choice. How stupid are you??

I have you pegged as an INCEL who is bitter about love and romance because no one will have you

The point is- if your small mind can grasp it - is that if heterosexuals can assume that right, then gays people must also be able to do so. Good ******* lord!!

I remember you. You're just a pain in the ass troll and bigot who makes no sense and just spews moronic bullshit that you may or may not believe yourself . Clearly you are unable to learn anything You're back on ignore 'You've wasted enough of my time.