john doe 101
Platinum Member
- Sep 6, 2021
- 17,721
- 8,872
- 1,138
Your scientific experiments?What do you call a science that is non falsifiable?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your scientific experiments?What do you call a science that is non falsifiable?
Your link has no scientific proof and relies on 'experts' who 'say', etc. The article goes on to say the unusually strong trade winds are the result of hurricane Dora so your 'trade winds' as the sole reason theory is full of shit. The article reads "Hurricane Dora, which passed south of the islands this week, is exacerbating the low-pressure system and increasing the difference in air pressure to create "unusually strong trade winds." Apparently Hawaii's 'climatologist' had no clue of the impact of Dora until it was too late. He was probably cursing 'climate change' instead of doing his fucking job.
Your scientific experiments?
We can see a black hole, climate change is not an entity, loon.I dont have to be sucked into a black hole to prove that they exist.
Yeah, you're an idiot.Nice troll pal. Anything else to add?
Fair enough. But that does not dismiss the truth that stronger trade winds are also caused by increased surface temps of water. This increase in water surface temps would have caused the rapid increase in Dora's winds. Which goes back to scientists stating hurricanes will become more intense as the surface water temps increase. It just isnt some random act from god.Your link has no scientific proof and relies on 'experts' who 'say', etc. The article goes on to say the unusually strong trade winds are the result of hurricane Dora so your 'trade winds' as the sole reason theory is full of shit. The article reads "Hurricane Dora, which passed south of the islands this week, is exacerbating the low-pressure system and increasing the difference in air pressure to create "unusually strong trade winds." Apparently Hawaii's 'climatologist' had no clue of the impact of Dora until it was too late. He was probably cursing 'climate change' instead of doing his fucking job.
Have they? Have they made it rain in Maui yet to stop that horrible fire?They have. Open a book.
Hurricanes have not become more intense or more prevalent so, there is that.Fair enough. But that does not dismiss the truth that stronger trade winds are also caused by increased surface temps of water. This increase in water surface temps would have caused the rapid increase in Dora's winds. Which goes back to scientists stating hurricanes will become more intense as the surface water temps increase. It just isnt some random act from god.
You cant see a black hole, dummy.We can see a black hole, climate change is not an entity, loon.
You cant see a black hole, dummy.
Hurricanes have not become more intense or more prevalent so, there is that.
You cant directly observe a black hole. You can only infer their presense. You can only see light that is bent by a black hole. Which is what I"m assuming we are looking at here. Maybe the scientist will chime in on this.View attachment 813339
That is what a black hole looks like in space, fuckwad.
No you're a retired old man that has lost grasp on reality.I don't do experiments. I'm a field geologist. Not that you would understand.
Now, answer the question.
![]()
Hurricanes and Climate Change
www.c2es.org
"Warmer sea surface temperatures intensify tropical storm wind speeds, giving them the potential to deliver more damage if they make landfall. Over the 39-year period from 1979-2017, the number of major hurricanes has increased while the number of smaller hurricanes has decreased. Based on modeling, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicts an increase in Category 4 and 5 hurricanes, alongside increased hurricane wind speeds."
No you're a retired old man that has lost grasp on reality.
This coming from a guy who said Einstein was never proven wrong.That's a bullshit claim. The frequency, and intensity of hurricanes in the 1950s was far greater.
That's why they only look at the re ord AFTER that.
That is called fraud.
It's the .3% of "scientists" you agree with. YOu should be quite familiar with it.And still you dodge the question.
Here, I will make it easy for you.
A science that non falsifiable is classified as a pseudo science.
Feel free to look that term up too.
Gee what a surprise! You fell for the media lies. Here's some reality for you.![]()
Hurricanes and Climate Change
www.c2es.org
"Warmer sea surface temperatures intensify tropical storm wind speeds, giving them the potential to deliver more damage if they make landfall. Over the 39-year period from 1979-2017, the number of major hurricanes has increased while the number of smaller hurricanes has decreased. Based on modeling, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicts an increase in Category 4 and 5 hurricanes, alongside increased hurricane wind speeds."
This coming from a guy who got a masters in anthropology. Maybe I'll start listening to the geologist on climate change as well. Nah, I'll stick to people that deal with the science of climate.Gee what a surprise! You fell for the media lies. Here's some reality for you.
![]()
Shellenberger: Media Lying About Climate & Hurricanes – ‘The media are consciously & deliberately misleading the public’
By Michael Shellenberger Over the last several weeks, many mainstream news media outlets have claimed that hurricanes are becoming more expensive, more frequent, and more intense because of climate…www.climatedepot.com
Thanks to the NYT, who published a cherry picked graph, people like you who seem to only read approved legacy media 'news' think something called 'climate change' is somehow causing hurricanes to become more frequent and stronger. Reality:
"The reason we can’t attribute trends in hurricanes to climate change is that since reliable records started being kept the data indicates that hurricanes aren’t increasing in either frequency or intensity"
Educate yourself. Stop buying into the sheep feed.
This coming from a guy who said Einstein was never proven wrong.
The Saffir-Simpson scale that measure hurricane intensity wasnt developed until1971. Before that, it was just anecdotal evidence. Which is right up your alley in your version of science, right? We'll just go on your word that it was greater in the 50's. We'll submit your scientific study and see if it gets worldwide approval.