Matt Taibbi lays out why Liberals are destroying Free Speech

Yes

yes and yes

If it is government it is political. Covid was political. The government threatened and used force to destroy tghousands of small businesses and keep pep[;e shut in their homes. That was political not scientific.
Why did the government want to destroy thousands of small businesses and keep people shut in their homes? That sounds like a tin-foil conspriacy theory.

The government uses global warming as an excuse to strangle some businesses whle promoting others. That is political not scientific.
I presume you mean coal and oil? Does the science say the CO2 levels are rising or not?
 
True.
I remember when hard hats were implemented on some of my job sites.
I remember when safety glasses were implemented on some of my job sites.
I remember random drug testing was implemented on some of my job sites.
All of which, in the case of non compliance, you would be escorted off the property to your vehicle and be fired........On the spot.
Yes, because if you're injured on the job, the company is liable and their insurance has to pay which may mean increased premiums for them.

If you remember, Biden tried to enact a vaccine mandate for companies of a hundred employees or more. A judge struck it down because it was ruled unconstitutional.
 
A test is not an experimental vaccine, you dolt. :laughing0301:
So?
You still must take one, THAT'S the point, you fuking idiot.

Your cult logic is the same as a applying for a driving job, but should be exempt from a driving TEST.
But, that's your dear leader's entire regime.
 
So?
You still must take one, THAT'S the point, you fuking idiot.

Your cult logic is the same as a applying for a driving job, but should be exempt from a driving TEST.
But, that's your dear leader's entire regime.

You are so ******* stupid that you don't know what the difference is. :laughing0301:
 
Why did the government want to destroy thousands of small businesses and keep people shut in their homes? That sounds like a tin-foil conspriacy theory.


I presume you mean coal and oil? Does the science say the CO2 levels are rising or not?
Really?? Ruining potential competition for large corporations is a conspiracy theory? In what ******* universe?

You presume too little. It includes banning internal combustion vehicles and mandating electric vehicles. Science sats many things, when government responds by using force it IS political.
 
Bill Gates does not want tax cuts. Bill Gates favors policies that help the poor and middle class. Therefore, your "point" is meaningless.

You are a pathetic MAGA SUCKER in every sense of the word.

How much income tax does Bill Gates pay?
 
So there is one issue that applied to very few. I didnt say it was exactly rhe same, I said they were similar.

Trump funded the research. Trump rushed the vaccine into production. Trump promoted everyone to get the shot.
And if he hadn't rushed the vaccine into production, you on the Left would have cried and whined and kicked your little heels and said, "See?! He doesn't care about us!"
So he can't win, no matter what he does.
Or did, in this case.

Trump allowed Fauci and Company to run the show. It made all the sense in the world. I mean, who would be more qualified?
But then we began to piece together what a phony hack Fauci was and the whole perception changed.
I just read that young men in Norway are having a record number of heart issues. And that trend began in 2020.
I'm sure it's just a coincidence, right Big Pharma?
 
And if he hadn't rushed the vaccine into production, you on the Left would have cried and whined and kicked your little heels and said, "See?! He doesn't care about us!"
So he can't win, no matter what he does.
Or did, in this case.

Trump allowed Fauci and Company to run the show. It made all the sense in the world. I mean, who would be more qualified?
But then we began to piece together what a phony hack Fauci was and the whole perception changed.
I just read that young men in Norway are having a record number of heart issues. And that trend began in 2020.
I'm sure it's just a coincidence, right Big Pharma?

Bugger off with your brain dead rambling. I supported none of it but not being able to address the facts you have this incredible need to attack.
 
Remember how Ray Epps was all dressed in TRUMP GEAR and was DEMANDING people go INTO THE CAPITOL….YET NO LEFTIES WANTED HIM PUNISHED?

They claimed Ashley Babbitt deserved to DIE….but they wanted NOTHING TO HAPPEN TO EPPS.

That was so bizarre. A GUY DRIPPING IN MAGA GEAR, DEMANDING BREACH OF THE CAPITOL….LEFTIES DID NOT CARE, 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
 
Your hero pays none.
Don't know. Maybe none.

He should be forced to pay 50% taxes on his capital gains earnings. All billionaires should.

Your hero pays none.

So much for favoring policies that help the poor and middle class.
 
15th post
Re: "Science did not support covid mask mandates and science does not support claims of impending climate doom due to human industries."

Scientific consensus and empirical data overwhelmingly contradict these claims, as the scientific community affirms the efficacy of masks in reducing viral transmission and recognizes human activities as the unequivocal driver of current climate change. [1, 2, 3]
Regarding COVID-19 Mask Mandates:
  • Effectiveness: Leading health institutions, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, maintain that well-fitted masks reduce the inhalation and exhalation of respiratory droplets, lowering the risk of spreading infections like COVID-19.
  • Mandates: Observational studies and systemic reviews have demonstrated that mask usage and mandates correlated with reduced rates of viral transmission in both community and healthcare settings.
  • The Evidence Base: While the implementation and perceived efficacy of mandates have been subject to ongoing debate in public health due to the complexities of measuring real-world compliance, numerous peer-reviewed studies establish that physical masking reduces the spread of the virus, with N95 and surgical masks offering the highest level of protection. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Regarding Climate Change:
  • Scientific Consensus: According to NASA Science, over 99% of actively publishing climate scientists agree that human activities are the primary driver of global climate change.
  • The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): The United Nations Climate Change body, the IPCC, considers human influence on the warming of the atmosphere, oceans, and land to be unequivocal.
  • The Impending Risk: The scientific consensus supported by data from NASA's Causes of Climate Change points to greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion as the main factor driving atmospheric temperature increases, sea-level rise, and more frequent extreme weather events. Major scientific academies across the globe corroborate these findings
 


I love me some Matt Taibbi. True independent journalist, like Aaron Mate.

Matt discusses how the left during the Biden administration pushed people towards a certain direction of thought.

Classic Alinsky tactics that seems to have worked on so many people.

COVID AND CLIMATE CHANGE ARE PERFECT EXAMPLES.

There's no such thing as free speech in a far left regime that RULES WITH AN IRON FIST. Scrap the courts, scrap the Constitution and our rights, force people to OBEY or be PUNISHED INTO SUBMISSION this is the left's game plan.
 
Really?? Ruining potential competition for large corporations is a conspiracy theory? In what ******* universe?
Got an example? Preferably in this universe.

You presume too little. It includes banning internal combustion vehicles and mandating electric vehicles. Science sats many things, when government responds by using force it IS political.
I drive several internal combustion vehicles, what ban are you talking about?
 
Back
Top Bottom