MASSIVE Democrat Dark Money Scheme Uncovered, Possibly The Largest Dark Money Scheme For The Left

[progressive hunter]

the democrats rot runs deep,,,

 

[depotoo]

The Sixteen Thirty Fund has been characterized as one of the “key groups founded to resist Trump” by the left-leaning Atlantic.
Sixteen Thirty Fund
Documents reveal massive 'dark-money' group boosted Democrats in 2018

 

[BULLDOG]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

 

[ABikerSailor]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

Agreed. We need to stop allowing the rich people to buy our elections.

 

[CWayne]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

 

[pknopp]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

You cant just repeal Supreme Court rulings.

 

[pknopp]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

One of the largest participants in that lawsuit was the NRA.

 

[progressive hunter]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

One of the largest participants in that lawsuit was the NRA.

the one thing about the NRA is they are a civil rights group,,,,

those I dont have a big problem with,,,

 

[BULLDOG]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

The dark money referenced in this OP would not have been legal before Citizens United. It is legal after Citizens United was passed.

 

[CWayne]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

One of the largest participants in that lawsuit was the NRA.

Your point?

 

[pknopp]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

One of the largest participants in that lawsuit was the NRA.

the one thing about the NRA is they are a civil rights group,,,,

those I dont have a big problem with,,,

That's the way it always is. People want to ban those they disagree with but allow those they agree with to participate. That is never going to work.

 

[pknopp]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

The dark money referenced in this OP would not have been legal before Citizens United. It is legal after Citizens United was passed.

Yes it was.

 

[CWayne]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

The dark money referenced in this OP would not have been legal before Citizens United. It is legal after Citizens United was passed.

That is because, before the ruling, businesses were being used as pawns to finance government schemes. After, they were permitted to fight back using the only voice they had.

 

[pknopp]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

One of the largest participants in that lawsuit was the NRA.

Your point?

The defense of our free speech rights was fortunately bi-partisan.

 

[BULLDOG]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

You cant just repeal Supreme Court rulings.

Congress could pass a law to effectively repeal it at any time, and the Supreme Court would be bound by the new law.

 

[progressive hunter]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

One of the largest participants in that lawsuit was the NRA.

the one thing about the NRA is they are a civil rights group,,,,

those I dont have a big problem with,,,

That's the way it always is. People want to ban those they disagree with but allow those they agree with to participate. That is never going to work.

agreeing has nothing to do with it,,,they are a civil rights org. plain and simple,,,

 

[pknopp]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

You cant just repeal Supreme Court rulings.

Congress could pass a law to effectively repeal it at any time, and the Supreme Court would be bound by the new law.

That isn't how it works.

 

[BULLDOG]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

One of the largest participants in that lawsuit was the NRA.

the one thing about the NRA is they are a civil rights group,,,,

those I dont have a big problem with,,,

The NRA is the marketing wing for the gun manufacturers. It might have once been a good organization. No longer.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Oh goody, not only does the left run the web, TV, Hollywood, "news", music and gadgets, they get dark money too.

And yet they're still losers, I wonder why?

 

[progressive hunter]

We should repeal Citizens United so that sort of thing wouldn't be perfectly legal any more. The idiots who wanted that passed wanted dark money freely available.

No, the people who wanted the Citizen's United case wanted to keep the left from turning American business into a cash-generating cow for the government without allowing them to defend themselves.

However, you are correct in that this kind of thing happens when the right of free assembly is permitted to flourish.

One of the largest participants in that lawsuit was the NRA.

the one thing about the NRA is they are a civil rights group,,,,

those I dont have a big problem with,,,

The NRA is the marketing wing for the gun manufacturers. It might have once been a good organization. No longer.

some are trying to fix that,,but it changes nothing,,,