I'm sure (in fact I know) there are some fine male doctors out there who would never even think of doing such a thing, but that is too big of a risk to take when you are responsible for the safety and well being of HUNDREDS (if not thousands) of young girls (and some boys as well).
Too big of a risk, meaning you think its a good % chance that males will do this sort of thing?
I wouldnt say so, I wont accept these scummers as representatives of my gender. I didnt subscribe to it and I wont allow it, same as cat callers and creepers and all the rest.
Plus, compare the % of humans that are pedophiles to the % of humans that are lesbian pedophiles and then see if gender assigning your doctor even mitigates that risk.
The rhetoric here is that Data doesnt matter, but of course it does and having a Male Doctor is close to zero risk and Im very sorry for these Victims and that these scumbags even exist......but they're not our breed they're something different than "male," they're mentally ill.
Sexual abuse of minors is overwhelmingly committed by the male gender. That is just a fact of life.
But the problem is, its not "overwhelmingly committed," period.
So, thinking its some big risk is incorrect, it ignores reality.
I know thats hard to hear, being that it occurs and causes pain and its tough, but I dont not drive simply because car accidents can mangle me, cause me to be pinned to my dashboard, and then the car starts on fire and I die a horrid death.
Acting like choosing male doctors is some risk is the same, it aint a risk its a super long shot ******* bet that the doctor is some predator.
And thats just "a fact."
Dont get a family dog because one in tens of millions will eat your baby, I dont think so.