This is an interesting discussion.
What I see are people defending wal marts practices: some say predatory. And others that denounces this practice. This to me, is the end game with wal mart.
If a foreign country were to do to the US what wal mart does to local towns, (dumping, ie, lowering prices so much that others are driven out, because you can afford the "temp" dump) we would all be up in arms. Yet, we all get shoulder to shoulder with wal mart for dumping. Why?
Is it because wal mart is an "American" company? Thus the market should reign supreme? Do we dislike foreign companies doing the same thing because, a nod only because, they are somewhat subsidized by their own government? What is it?
Btw, there is a huge, and I mean huge issue of this import coming to my town: that is, whether or not to allow 150 acres for development of which would be a strip mall Target, Whole foods (I like), Lowes (just had home depot move in, which costco will be right next door in Aug.) and others. Many issues behind this bill, but, most do not want SLO to lose its downtown appeal. I at first signed up to vote against the new development (on farm land). However, when I recieved the vote pack in the mail, I reconsidered and have not been able to send it in.
Here is my thing:
I love this town (45K pop, cty, 220K, and we are cty seat) and don't want it to grow. I grew up here, but have lived in the NW for the past 10. We have a college that has a pop of 18K.
I would love the stores, esp whole foods. However, this would require a new access ramp for the FW, which after living in Salem, OR, is maybe not a bad thing, yet we have 10, in only a town this size.
One major issue is Wal Mart. So far the developer has promised that wal mart will not move in, yet, NO store has a K, thus, WM or any other store could move in. There is a WM 15 miles S of here, no problem going to it. Had to go to it because their prices on my necessities are by far much lower than anywhere else (even costco on some items).
But, I do not want a walmart in this town. Why? Well, even though this is farmland that the owner wants to sell (our land is now much more valuable than crops, save grapes for wine) the city still has a say over what goes onto his land, b/c we have a very, very conservative growth policy, which has kept this town what it is today.
So the question is: given a "free" market economy, should the citizens of this town vote for the marketplace? Should they vote for getting of farm land (200 acres) and put a mall in? This property sits by a freeway, border on one side by Bed Bath and Beyond Me (even though my wife loves it) and staples.
I have to vote in the coming week. Any advice or questions would be appreciated.
Thanks