Mark Judge’s book validates Christine Blasey Ford’s timeline of the alleged Kavanaugh assault

[Maxdeath]

We have to look at what we actually have in front of us.

Ford can not remember date, time, place, how she got there, how she got home or whose house it was. The only witnesses she really has are ones that heard a story long after it happened.

Kavanaugh says it did not happen, Judge says he has never seen Kavanaugh do anything like that. Two others, one being her freind, say that they are not aware that Ford was ever at a party with Kavanaugh or that they were never at a party as described.

Ford's therapist was so incompetent as to write down four boys when Ford said two. The polygraph did not ask base line questions and only asked two vague questions about the party. Even it claims four boys.

Ford in her statement to the committee claimed that she knew that Kavanaugh would some day be nominated for the Supreme Court. Able to tell the future?

Two men have come forward to claim that they maybe the ones in Fords story. A girl that was molested left her good friend alone at a party which contained someone who had just molested her without even a word of warning.

Memory is funny. A woman said that she had heard rumors all over school until someone pointed out that Ford did not say anything until 2012 then walked it back. Is it possible that two others were involved and in her drunken state she was mistaken on who it was? Is it possible that something else happened or that nothing at all happened?

We have numerous people all saying that Kavanaugh was and is a good person. How many have said the same about Ford?

 

[sakinago]

Ford implies that his face got white as a ghost because he saw her and was scared because of what happened. So she’s not too good at reading body language.

The reason for him turning white and looking ill when she ran into him could be due to due to him being rattled by her appearance, him being hung over or still drunk as he claims was often the case when he arrived at work at 7:00 a.m. or it could be both.

The point of the article though is so many people are bashing Ford because she's unable to pinpoint the exact date, time & location of the event. Judge's own words in his book gives some credence to the scenario she outlined. I believe "choir boy" was how Kavanaugh was originally representing himself and I heard on World News Tonight that he made the statement that he "drank beer" sometimes "more than he should have" and that he's done things that when he looks back on them makes him "cringe". That's a very different portrayal than his original one.

A 15 year old girl not being able to correctly ascertain the source of why he was looking pale and ill is not exactly a fail in reading body language.

What? No, no one claimed he was a choir boy. He does have a gleaming record as a citizen, meaning nobody had anything bad to say about him, many had only good things to say about him, solid career, good family man, basketball couch, etc. That doesn’t make him a choir boy, he’s not claiming that. This is lunatic logic that “he drank in high school, therefore he’s not a choir boy, therefore he’s been deceptive”. What!? The drinking age was 18 back in his day. So he’s guilty of underage drinking...along with 97% of the freaking population. Does getting a speeding ticket exclude one from being a choir boy? Ford was drinking when she was 15, she’s not a choir girl, should we doubt her testimony now?

Big issue with Fords testimony now is that her best friend at the time says she didn’t even know Kavanaugh. She was apparently at this party, and doesn’t remember anything Ford was describing, not the party, not kavanough and judge, none of that. Either she’s a shitty friend who didn’t notice her best friend leaving the party abruptly, or maybe Ford is making this up. We don’t know, we can never know wth the information we have now. The FBI will never know with the information we have now. Allegations alone are not enough to disqualify. If they were, every single person is subject to that standard.

 

[toobfreak]

Mark Judge’s book validates Christine Blasey Ford’s timeline of the alleged Kavanaugh assault

All it suggests is that either Ford or her attorney read Judge's book first before coaching her on what to say.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I find this new information very interesting. When I heard of Judge's continued insistence that he doesn't recall the incident in question I figured it was just due to his friendship to Kavanaugh (the guy code to back each other no matter what) but then I figured maybe he didn't want the publicity. If he's written a book about his drinking problem back in school then not wanting the publicity would not exactly make sense, however if what he's attempting to avoid is saying anything under oath that can be disputed or contradicted through his own word, such as in this book, that makes more sense to me.

Analysis | Mark Judge’s book validates Christine Blasey Ford’s timeline of the alleged Kavanaugh assault

During her testimony Thursday morning, Christine Blasey Ford offered one piece of information that she felt could narrow down the time frame of the alleged incident in which she says she was assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh at a gathering at a house in Maryland when they were in high school.

She described having seen Kavanaugh’s classmate Mark Judge — who she alleges was in the room when the attack occurred — shortly after the alleged incident.

“I did see Mark Judge once at the Potomac Village Safeway after the time of the attack,” she said, “and it would be helpful with anyone’s resources if — to figure out when he worked there if people are wanting more details from me about when the attack occurred. If we could find out when he worked there, then I could provide a more detailed timeline about when the attack occurred.”

Responding to questions from Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), she gave more details about that alleged encounter.

“I was going to the Potomac Village Safeway, this is the one on the corner of Falls and River Road,” she said. “And I was with my mother and I was a teenager, so I wanted her to go in one door and me the other. I chose the wrong door because the door I chose was the one where Mark Judge — it looked like he was working there and arranging the shopping carts.”

“I said hello to him, and his face was white and very uncomfortable saying hello back,” she continued. “And we had previously been friendly at the times that we saw each other over the previous two years. . . . I wouldn’t characterize him as not friendly, he was just nervous and not really wanting to speak with me. He looked a little bit ill.”

“How long did this occur after the incident?” Durbin asked.

“I would estimate six to eight weeks,” she replied.

To Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Ford offered some ways in which the time frame of Judge’s employment might be ascertained by the committee: perhaps “through employment records or the IRS or anything,” she said.

There’s a better source, as it turns out: Judge’s book, “Wasted: Tales of a Gen X Drunk,” published in 1997.​

Estimating that 6 to 8 weeks later she saw judge at his work place might narrow it down a little bit but is does not verify anything

 

[miketx]

Bitch can't keep her lies straight...

FORD CAUGHT IN MAJOR LIE? — City Remodeling Permits Show Project She Linked to Kavanaugh Was in 2008 NOT 2012

Christine Blasey Ford told the US Senate Judiciary Committee that the memories of Brett Kavanaugh “first came up” when she went into counseling in 2012. In May 2012 Ford and her husband argued over her desire to add “a second front door” to their home. Ford told the committee on Thursday the desire for a second door was because Brett Kavanaugh made her “claustrophobic.”

FORD CAUGHT IN MAJOR LIE? -- City Remodeling Permits Show Project She Linked to Kavanaugh Was in 2008 NOT 2012

Gateway Pundit.
Fake news.
But great chum for Trump's trained seals.
.
.
.

CLassic, never fails....

Regressive liberal ROE
.
.
.
.
.



17. Fox News/Alex Jones/Brietbart/infowars/Stormfront/Gateway/hannity

 

[miketx]

A drunken sluts book proves nothing other than as usual, you are a gullible libtard.

Kavanaugh's best buddy from high school is a drunken slut?
What does that make him?
LOL!
See July 1 and 28.
.
.

Thanks for proving your misogyny. A woman who engages in drunken multiple partner sex acts is a slut, but a man isn't? lol!

 

[Pop23]

So, you read his book, then use it to make up part of your story..........

And this means what exactly?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If it was 8 weeks since the incident, it was unlikely that Judge remembered her at all. Even if the incident happened.

The book is not supposed to be factual anyway.

 

[mikegriffith1]

LOL. I guess it never occurred to you that she tailored her new story to fit the book. Why does her current version differ so markedly from the version that she told to her therapist in 2012, as reported by the Washington Post? When will she release her therapist's notes for that session? Even the abbreviated version of the notes that the Washington Post discussed differs substantially from her current story. Gee, why is that? And why did she lie about being afraid of flying?