- Moderator
- #1,621
people with a credible claim should be heard out. otherwise next year ime a democrat is making their selection all that has to happen is someone makes a last minute vague accusation n demands to be taken seriously. would you give the right the effortvyou are demanding for the left?perhaps you can provide a link to ANY credible winess to her claims.Judiciary Committee Continues Effort to Accommodate ...
judiciary.senate.gov
15 hours ago · Mark Judge and one other alleged witness to the events Dr. Ford has described have already denied the allegations under penalty of felony to the Committee. We can obtain additional testimony through staff interviews, obtaining statements, or other means that are subject to penalties of felony, if necessary.
Has mark judge given judicial committee a statement under oath - Bing
If ignorance is bliss, you must be very happy.
.
That doesn't say he appeared before the committee, or that he testified under oath. It is a felony to lie to Congress, oath or not. It could have been a phone call. Don't try to make it something it's not. Or perhaps you can provide a link to Mark Judge's testimony under oath.
you gloss over this detail but demand exact detail in return.
fucked up, dude.
I cannot. I think the Committee should hear her out, and question any alleged witnesses. Why not?
I wouldn't oppose it, in a similar situation. I agree the last minute nature of it rouses opposition, but the Committee still has an obligation.
Sure, I'm partisan. So is the Committee. In an ethical government, the man making the nomination would tell his FBI to check it out.
Pretty funny.
Where would you suggest the FBI start?
.